On Thursday, 22 August 2013 at 01:40:05 UTC, Gambler wrote:
On 8/20/2013 3:18 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 August 2013 at 16:07:00 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.type.makegenerictype.aspx
How would you implement this in native code?
Like we use to
On 8/20/2013 3:18 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 August 2013 at 16:07:00 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.type.makegenerictype.aspx
>> How would you implement this in native code?
>
> Like we use to do in the old days when we were forced to rewrite
> A
On Tuesday, 20 August 2013 at 16:07:00 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.type.makegenerictype.aspx
How would you implement this in native code?
Like we use to do in the old days when we were forced to rewrite
Assembly on the fly.
Allocate a memory buffer with
On Tuesday, 20 August 2013 at 16:34:26 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
...
1. Compiler generates x86 code, which is executed directly by
the CPU, and nearly all the source program operations (setting
a variable, calling a function, etc.) are encoded directly in
the produced code. E.g. setting a va
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:34:24 +0200
"Luís Marques" wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 August 2013 at 13:37:00 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> > Native code has nothing to do with systems programming or the
> > mapping of one-to-one from language to microprocessor
> > instructions.
>
> At least in the context of
On Tuesday, 20 August 2013 at 13:37:00 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Native code has nothing to do with systems programming or the
mapping of one-to-one from language to microprocessor
instructions.
At least in the context of "fully native" and C#, which we were
discussing, I disagree. See below.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.type.makegenerictype.aspx
How would you implement this in native code?
On Tuesday, 20 August 2013 at 12:49:36 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 August 2013 at 07:45:28 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
...
I don't quite agree with this. Imagine if I said "they just
have to change their Javascript compilers to produce native
code". It's clear that the semantics of the
On Tuesday, 20 August 2013 at 07:45:28 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
With the failure that Longhorn and Vista were, the .NET
political camp inside Microsoft lost power to the native guys.
I bet this is what was behind the WinRT decision, because the
original .NET design documents for .NET were actua
On Tuesday, 20 August 2013 at 02:20:38 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
I thought that, if anything, Microsoft was regretting going too
high-level.
There is a video from Channel 9 with Herb Sutter (perhaps [1],
not sure) where I recall him saying that the .Net mania had
died out and Microsoft develop
On Tuesday, 20 August 2013 at 01:28:38 UTC, Nick B wrote:
Hi.
I can across this off-topic. It is 2 years old, but it seems
well written.
http://i-programmer.info/professional-programmer/i-programmer/2591-dumping-net-microsofts-madness.html
Here is a preview book from MS, to back up this po
BTW, I was disappointed to find out (and I had to dig through
several contradictory articles to clarify that) that WinRT is not
planned to (eventually) be the new core Windows API (the lowest
level one, ignoring the NT "native" API) , upon which higher
level APIs (like .Net) are built.
Things
I thought that, if anything, Microsoft was regretting going too
high-level.
There is a video from Channel 9 with Herb Sutter (perhaps [1],
not sure) where I recall him saying that the .Net mania had died
out and Microsoft developers were again focusing on C++.
[1]
http://channel9.msdn.com/p
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 18:28:37 -0700, Nick B
wrote:
Hi.
I can across this off-topic. It is 2 years old, but it seems well
written.
http://i-programmer.info/professional-programmer/i-programmer/2591-dumping-net-microsofts-madness.html
Here is a preview book from MS, to back up this point
Hi.
I can across this off-topic. It is 2 years old, but it seems well
written.
http://i-programmer.info/professional-programmer/i-programmer/2591-dumping-net-microsofts-madness.html
Here is a preview book from MS, to back up this point above:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/microsoft_press/archive
15 matches
Mail list logo