Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> It does help, but I was kind of hoping for something that shows the
> structure.
Those relationships are in the HTML too try it now:
http://arsdnet.net/d-web-site/std_algorithm.html
(I know it needs some work still, I'm just sick of Javascript after
spending 20 m
Adam Ruppe:
> (I know it needs some work still, I'm just sick of Javascript after
> spending 20 minutes tracking down a bug caused by me using the
> same variable name twice! Gah! And wow do I miss foreach.)
A good C lint is very good at spotting that kind of bugs. There are lints for
JS too, bu
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:08:53 -0500, Adam Ruppe
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
It does help, but I was kind of hoping for something that shows the
structure.
Those relationships are in the HTML too try it now:
http://arsdnet.net/d-web-site/std_algorithm.html
(I know it needs some w
Adam Ruppe Wrote:
> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> > It does help, but I was kind of hoping for something that shows the
> > structure.
>
> Those relationships are in the HTML too try it now:
> http://arsdnet.net/d-web-site/std_algorithm.html
>
> (I know it needs some work still, I'm just sic
On 30/01/2011 18:55, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic napisał:
If you really want to set up a column limit that *everyone* has to abide to,
then make a poll to see what everyone can agree on.
Actually that's a splendid idea. Let's take it easy. Regardless of that silly
beef I'm really
2011/1/30 Walter Bright :
> People who use screen readers often crank up the playback rate to 2x. The
> software adjusts the pitch so it doesn't sound like the Chipmunks.
>
> I've often wondered why DVRs don't do this (I've sent the suggestion to
> Tivo, they ignored me). I'd like the option to pla
Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
2011/1/30 Walter Bright :
People who use screen readers often crank up the playback rate to 2x. The
software adjusts the pitch so it doesn't sound like the Chipmunks.
I've often wondered why DVRs don't do this (I've sent the suggestion to
Tivo, they ignored me). I'd like
2011/1/31 Walter Bright :
>> I think the reason I.E. YouTube and Tivo don't do it is that AFAIU, it
>> is fairly CPU-consuming (FFT back and forth?) In the TiVo-case, my
>> guess is nobody paid for the hardware, and in the YouTube-case I doubt
>> neither Flash nor JavaScript will enable the perform
Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
Of course, I don't know what HW the Tivo is using, perhaps they're just lazy. :)
I thought that DSP's were programmable.
I might be wrong, I hardly ever get to touch things that low-level,
unfortunately.
However, I think the DSP:s included in most STB:s are severely limited
in how much you can twist them. AFAIU, that's one quiet important
aspect of the whole HTML5 video-codec debacle. I.E. in the boxes I
work with,
Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
I might be wrong, I hardly ever get to touch things that low-level,
unfortunately.
However, I think the DSP:s included in most STB:s are severely limited
in how much you can twist them. AFAIU, that's one quiet important
aspect of the whole HTML5 video-codec debacle. I.E.
On 31/01/2011 17:01, Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
Now, what we need is the audio-equivalent of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NcIJXTlugc
Damn, pretty damn impressive!
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
