Hi
I like reading the bugs list.
I see lots of patches (for example from Rainer Schuetze) but I don't see all of
them applied (in the latest release).
How does that work?
Regards
Alex
I'm looking for volunteers to convert all the remaining patches in Bugzilla to
pull requests.
Hello Alex,
Hi
I like reading the bugs list.
I see lots of patches (for example from Rainer Schuetze) but I don't
see all of them applied (in the latest release).
How does that work?
While the source for DMD is available (and many parts open source), only
very few people have the &qu
On 09/04/10 14:08, Alex Strickland wrote:
Hi
I like reading the bugs list.
I see lots of patches (for example from Rainer Schuetze) but I don't see
all of them applied (in the latest release).
How does that work?
Regards
Alex
Quite a few of the 68 patches are planned for inclusion int
Hello Robert,
Hopefully when he gets some
time again he'll start filtering through the patches and commenting on
them/applying them.
Has anyone tried to reveres engineer a coding standard from Walter's comments/etc.
on patches?
If we can talk him into committing between eac
BCS:
> If we can talk him into committing between each patch he apples
Nowdays this is mostly true, with few exceptions like the 4004, 4005, 4019,
4020, 4027, 4029 bunch, that was a pack of related changes.
Bye,
bearophile
Alex Strickland wrote:
How does that work?
Thanks for the replies. On rereading my post it sounded it a bit trollish, but
on reexamining my motives, maybe I meant to be :)
Regards
Alex
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
> I'm looking for volunteers to convert all the remaining patches in Bugzilla
> to pull requests.
I could take a crack at it, although if you're going to do that, why
not move the issue tracking to Github as well and take
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Andrew Wiley wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Walter Bright
> wrote:
> > I'm looking for volunteers to convert all the remaining patches in
> Bugzilla
> > to pull requests.
>
> I could take a crack at it, although if yo
On Monday, 19 December 2011 at 07:13:54 UTC, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
I'm looking for volunteers to convert all the remaining
patches in Bugzilla
to pull requests.
I could take a crack at it, although if you're going to do
tha
king for volunteers to convert all the remaining patches in
> Bugzilla
> > to pull requests.
>
> I could take a crack at it, although if you're going to do that, why
> not move the issue tracking to Github as well and take advantage of
> the integratio
On 12/18/2011 11:13 PM, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
I'm looking for volunteers to convert all the remaining patches in Bugzilla
to pull requests.
I could take a crack at it, although if you're going to do that, why
not move the issu
On 12/18/2011 11:20 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Andrew Wiley
That kills it right there.
"Andrew Wiley" wrote in message
news:mailman.1702.1324278833.24802.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Walter Bright
> wrote:
>> I'm looking for volunteers to convert all the remaining patches in
>> Bugzilla
>> to pull r
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 23:00:30 -0800, Walter Bright
wrote:
I'm looking for volunteers to convert all the remaining patches in Bugzilla to
pull requests.
I've been planning on converting all of mine, but I haven't had bandwidth to do
so this fall.
Who was it that has the appropriate paperwork on file to get patches into gdb?
I've got a small diff that fixes a critical problem with it's demangler:
diff --git a/gdb/d-lang.c b/gdb/d-lang.c
index 6db521b..f17431b 100644
--- a/gdb/d-lang.c
+++ b/gdb/d-lang.c
@@ -
After the last posts about patches, I can write something myself about this
topic :-) I am far from being an expert of big software projects, but I think I
am now able to understand some things of the D project.
I like D, it's an alive project, but from what I've seen D so far is not
For DMD in GitHub there are more than one hundred open pull
requests (currently 111). So far people have created more than
one thousand patches for DMD (currently 1022):
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pulls
Among the list of open pull requests there are some bugs and
On 01/08/10 10:01, Brad Roberts wrote:
Who was it that has the appropriate paperwork on file to get patches into gdb?
I've got a small diff that fixes a critical problem with it's demangler:
diff --git a/gdb/d-lang.c b/gdb/d-lang.c
index 6db521b..f17431b 100644
--- a/gdb/d-lang.c
+
On 8/1/2010 3:49 AM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
> On 01/08/10 10:01, Brad Roberts wrote:
>> Who was it that has the appropriate paperwork on file to get patches into
>> gdb?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brad
>
> If I recall correctly all you need to do is send a mess
fix dsss incorrect abort by failure mkdir command(this causes troubles
when you build dil). make dsss take advantage of d header files.
fix rebuild to behave correctly to the setting of "one at a time". fix
rebuild threading problem on HT cpus which falsely report cpu cores. fix
rebuild missi
On 4/10/2010 8:40 AM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
I'd like to see more effort put into ldc to get it working with D2, I
guess that unless the ldc developers find time for it, or other people
do it won't happen for a good while yet unfortunately. I did try a while
back, but realised what a huge task it
On 10/04/10 15:49, Eric Poggel wrote:
Speaking of ldc, does anyone know how Windows support is coming? Last I
heard llvm was lacking support for exception handling on Windows, which
sort of stalled things.
LDC on windows works just fine, providing you don't need exceptions.
Until LLVM supports
On 10/04/10 13:09, bearophile wrote:
After the last posts about patches, I can write something myself
about this topic :-) I am far from being an expert of big software
projects, but I think I am now able to understand some things of the
D project.
I like D, it's an alive project, but
s.
"That fetus has a heartbeat, but from what I've seen so far, it hasn't landed
a very good job."
> So as D develops and grows it will get hard for a single person to write all
> patches to the language and other parts.
There's about a dozen contributors now tha
On 04/10/2010 07:09 AM, bearophile wrote:
Currently ldc is a compiler much better than dmd (try it if you don't believe
me!)
Bye,
bearophile
I've tried it several times recently and I don't believe you as a
result. I have yet to see it not crash AND generate faster code than dmd.
bearophile wrote:
After the last posts about patches, I can write something myself about this
topic :-) I am far from being an expert of big software projects, but I think I
am now able to understand some things of the D project.
I like D, it's an alive project, but from what I've
bearophile wrote:
After the last posts about patches, I can write something myself about this
topic :-) I am far from being an expert of big software projects, but I think I
am now able to understand some things of the D project.
I like D, it's an alive project, but from what I've
Don:
>And really, D doesn't need many people working on the DMD compiler.<
I agree, it's like having many people working around a dead corpse trying to
revive it. Better use the time to adopt gcc and llvm back-ends at their best,
keeping in mind, while designing D, that there are features that
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 03:41:20PM -0400, bearophile wrote:
> it's like having many people working around a dead corpse trying to revive
> it. Better use the time to adopt gcc and llvm back-ends at their best,
"Yeah, I know D doesn't work on Windows, or even many Linux boxes, but it
totally uses
Hello Adam,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 03:41:20PM -0400, bearophile wrote:
it's like having many people working around a dead corpse trying to
revive it. Better use the time to adopt gcc and llvm back-ends at
their best,
"Yeah, I know D doesn't work on Windows, or even many Linux boxes, but
it
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:41:20 -0400, bearophile
wrote:
>
> Don:
>
> >And really, D doesn't need many people working on the DMD compiler.<
>
> I agree, it's like having many people working around a dead corpse trying to
> revive it. Better use the time to adopt gcc and llvm back-ends at their b
bearophile wrote:
Don:
And really, D doesn't need many people working on the DMD compiler.<
I agree, it's like having many people working around a dead corpse trying to
revive it. Better use the time to adopt gcc and llvm back-ends at their best,
keeping in mind, while designing D, that the
On 16-apr-10, at 09:12, Don wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Don:
And really, D doesn't need many people working on the DMD compiler.<
I agree, it's like having many people working around a dead corpse
trying to revive it. Better use the time to adopt gcc and llvm back-
ends at their best, keeping
bearophile, el 10 de abril a las 08:09 me escribiste:
> much slow in patching. A fork will not happen in D soon because there
> are not enough people yet that care and work for D enough to make a fork
> viable.
I think there were some sort of forks in the D history. I see Ares/Tango
as a fork of t
+1
On Thursday, 21 June 2012 at 07:40:35 UTC, bearophile wrote:
For DMD in GitHub there are more than one hundred open pull
requests (currently 111). So far people have created more than
one thousand patches for DMD (currently 1022):
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pulls
Among
On 2012-06-21 09:57, Andrea Fontana wrote:
+1
On Thursday, 21 June 2012 at 07:40:35 UTC, bearophile wrote:
For DMD in GitHub there are more than one hundred open pull requests
(currently 111). So far people have created more than one thousand
patches for DMD (currently 1022):
https
1) Currently the patches that Walter applies written by other people
come mostly from the most recent ones. I think this is not good.
Yep, github's default sort method sucks.
They should really implement some sort of voting scheme or something like
a "ready to merge" butt
On 21-Jun-12 11:40, bearophile wrote:
For DMD in GitHub there are more than one hundred open pull requests
(currently 111). So far people have created more than one thousand
patches for DMD (currently 1022):
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pulls
Among the list of open pull
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:51:03 -0700, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 21-Jun-12 11:40, bearophile wrote:
For DMD in GitHub there are more than one hundred open pull requests
(currently 111). So far people have created more than one thousand
patches for DMD (currently 1022):
https://github.com/D
There is a tracker for DSSS bugs on dsource. You should probably
attach these to a ticket there too, to make sure they are not lost in
newsgroup limbo. (But I agree posting something about it here too was
a good thing to do)
--bb
2009/4/7 davidl :
> fix dsss incorrect abort by failure mkdir com
After working on the debug information produced by dmd recently, I
started wondering what happened to the efforts to get the gdb patches
pushed upstream.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3207
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10142
After reading the threads attached
> I *meant* to show it was absurd by showing the GCC bug list.
OK, my bad then. Sorry for the noise.
> >I hope you can change the license some time, and you start
> >encouraging other people involvement more actively, so the number of
> >contributors to DMD keep growing.
Robert Clipsham, el 9 de abril a las 22:43 me escribiste:
> After working on the debug information produced by dmd recently, I
> started wondering what happened to the efforts to get the gdb
> patches pushed upstream.
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3207
> htt
dly and
helpful when I did.
Agreed, I think he'll know better than us what needs doing with him
being the current maintainer of the patches.
Thanks for pushing this forward again! I kinda forgot about it =)
Thanks for doing it in the first place, I'd probably not have thought
about it
I could be wrong but it sounds like one of the major problems here is that
the original authors aren't very motivated to help with this. If that's the
case, how much work would it be to redo the work? I'm thinking a chines wall
approach (I think that's the term) where someone looks at the patch
BCS, el 22 de April a las 18:26 me escribiste:
> I could be wrong but it sounds like one of the major problems here
> is that the original authors aren't very motivated to help with
> this.
Fortunately you are wrong :)
I contated Mihail and he is still working on the patch and merge, and he
is ve
Hi there,
I just spent most of this weekend digging into the DMD compiler code and
came up with a set of patches that might be of interest:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4713
All started out with the attempt to create .di interface files for
phobos2. The resulting .di
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Maybe you could comment on patches, and tell people how to fix them to be
accepted, that help a lot when you're willing to contribute. It's really
frustrating when you make a patch and it's not accepted (or delayed) and
you don't know why. This
parison to prove it.
I *meant* to show it was absurd by showing the GCC bug list.
OK, my bad then. Sorry for the noise.
I hope you can change the license some time, and you start
encouraging other people involvement more actively, so the number of
contributors to DMD keep growing.
I encourage
Norbert Nemec wrote:
I just spent most of this weekend digging into the DMD compiler code and
came up with a set of patches that might be of interest:
Thanks, Norbert!
Norbert Nemec wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I just spent most of this weekend digging into the DMD compiler code
> and came up with a set of patches that might be of interest:
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4713
>
> All started out with the attempt to cr
On 29/08/10 19:19, Sean Kelly wrote:
Norbert Nemec wrote:
Hi there,
I just spent most of this weekend digging into the DMD compiler code
and came up with a set of patches that might be of interest:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4713
All started out with the attempt to
I've started to make some minor mods to the DMD parser to tailor
it to my own taste, but there is no reason to do double work,
even if experimental. So I wonder which patches are available or
in the works by others?
I'm currently working on the following mods (not thoroughly
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 08:51:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I've started to make some minor mods to the DMD parser to
tailor it to my own taste, but there is no reason to do double
work, even if experimental. So I wonder which patches are
available or in the works by others?
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 08:51:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I've started to make some minor mods to the DMD parser to
tailor it to my own taste, but there is no reason to do double
work, even if experimental. So I wonder which patches are
available or in the works by others?
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 09:23:42 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
You really do hate portability, don't you?
I didn't ask about hatred. I asked about what is available so I
don't replicate the efforts of others.
Besides, it is fully portable since it is compiling to the same
AST (as of today).
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 09:26:23 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Good list of changes I'd love to never see the public exposures
to prevent even smallest chance someone will actually use it :P
Good for you, but please answer the question…?
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 08:51:09 +
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> What are you working on and what patches do you have?
lexer:
* stop validating UTF-8 in comments
* native-encoded strings (n"...")
parser:
* foreach (auto n; ...)
* foreach (auto; ...)
* foreach (; ...)
* lambdas
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 08:51:09 +
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> in : #arr;
> out: arr.length //or perhaps something more generic?
why not '$arr'? '$' is already established for 'length'.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
"Ola Fosheim Grøstad" " wrote in message
news:adjmadefxvblysyly...@forum.dlang.org...
I've started to make some minor mods to the DMD parser to tailor it to my
own taste, but there is no reason to do double work, even if experimental.
So I wonder which patches are availabl
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 19:37:22 +1000
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Attempting to fork D's syntax is harmful to D. Please stop.
it's easy: just close the code. this will effectively stop people who
want to experiment.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nswer the question…?
I submit all changes, even experimental ones, as pull request. If
it is not good / widely useful enough to have a change of being
accepted upstream I won't even bother thinking about design, not
even speaking about keeping local patches.
And if at some point I wi
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 09:40:29 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 08:51:09 +
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
in : #arr;
out: arr.length //or perhaps something more generic?
why not '$arr'? '$' is already established for 'length'.
Primarily because '$x' is usual
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 09:41:42 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 19:37:22 +1000
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Attempting to fork D's syntax is harmful to D. Please stop.
it's easy: just close the code. this will effectively stop
people who
want to e
u for this list, finally someone made an on-topic
response! Please keep me (and others with the same interest)
oriented in this thread about other changes you are making when
you get to look at other aspects of the language. I'll use your
"kill-*" patches and more, for sure!
now
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 13:36:37 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Attempting to fork D's syntax is harmful to D. Please stop.
it's easy: just close the code. this will effectively stop
people who
want to experiment.
It is funny how people one day tell you to create
proofs-of-concept i
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:41:32 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > Attempting to fork D's syntax is harmful to D. Please stop.
> it's easy: just close the code. this will effectively stop people who
> want to experiment.
or, without closing: just write it all in spaghetti-code that nobody is
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 13:33:09 +
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Primarily because '$x' is usually used for variables in other
> languages
that's great! confusing people is fun.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 13:40:46 +
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
fun fact: "kill-the-commas" is a play on old demo titled "kill the
clone". i don't even remember what effects was in this demo, but i
still remember the name.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 14:09:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
With many freedoms come many responsibilities. The fact that
you can fork the syntax and no one sue you for it (or actively
try to stop you from doing it) does not mean that it won't harm
your public image and overall attitude from som
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 14:21:01 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 13:33:09 +
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Primarily because '$x' is usually used for variables in other
languages
that's great! confusing people is fun.
Yeah! Confusing OTHER people is fun. I plan
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 14:58:01 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 14:09:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
With many freedoms come many responsibilities. The fact that
you can fork the syntax and no one sue you for it (or actively
try to stop you from doing it) does not
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:09:26 +
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Bullshit. Any kind of forking wastes most valuable resource open
> source world can possibly have - developer attention.
if particular developer so annoyed by mainline that he decided to fork
the project, this doesn't remove *
community
members who are willing to share their patches! Your contribution
to this thread is counter productive.
Ketmar is a noble example that I'd encourage others to follow.
More people like him would bring D out of stagnation.
If answer is yes, you will consider people expectation as much
On 09/08/2014 10:51 AM, "Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
" wrote:
What kind of syntactical sugar do you feel is missing in D?
int square(int x)=>x*x;
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:25:07 +0200
Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> int square(int x)=>x*x;
noted.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 08:51:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I'm currently working on the following mods (not thoroughly
tested yet):
What kind of syntactical sugar do you feel is missing in D?
//inclusive range
in : a ... b
out: a .. (b+1)
//range as start/length
in : a .$. b
casual it is a
single biggest killer of all open source projects.
Yet it is part of the freedom of open source, as Ola and ketmar
have pointed out. In any case, trading syntax patches with each
other and experimenting with different dialects, which is all
they've said they're doing so f
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 16:02:34 +
Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> In any case, trading syntax patches with each
> other and experimenting with different dialects, which is all
> they've said they're doing so far, is far from a full fork.
and i'm clearly stated that
; to receive on topic responses to your threads?
>
> I only want to receive a response on this thread from community
> members who are willing to share their patches! Your contribution
> to this thread is counter productive.
>
> Ketmar is a noble example that I'd encourage
Am Mon, 8 Sep 2014 18:34:10 +0300
schrieb ketmar via Digitalmars-d :
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:25:07 +0200
> Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
> > int square(int x)=>x*x;
> noted.
To clarify: There is x^^2, but the implementation uses
pow(x,2) and presumably yields a "real" result instead of
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 14:09:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
With many freedoms come many responsibilities. The fact that
you can fork the syntax and no one sue you for it (or actively
try to stop you from doing it) does not mean that it won't harm
your public image and overall attitude from som
On 09/08/2014 07:00 PM, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Mon, 8 Sep 2014 18:34:10 +0300
schrieb ketmar via Digitalmars-d :
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:25:07 +0200
Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d wrote:
int square(int x)=>x*x;
noted.
To clarify:
The above is not valid D 2.066 syntax.
Your apparent confusio
"Timon Gehr" wrote in message news:luko1s$otb$1...@digitalmars.com...
> There is x^^2, but the implementation uses pow(x,2)
Is this really still true?
x^^2 will be optimized by the fronend to x*x
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 18:55:46 +0200
Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> but #arr looks very unusual
not for those who loves Lua. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
threads?
I only want to receive a response on this thread from community
members who are willing to share their patches! Your
contribution to this thread is counter productive.
And I don't give a fuck what you expect because this thread
encourages counter-productive and harmful attitu
competition and
breaking possible stagantion. When it becomes casual it is a
single biggest killer of all open source projects.
Yet it is part of the freedom of open source, as Ola and ketmar
have pointed out. In any case, trading syntax patches with
each other and experimenting with different
patches
with each other and experimenting with different dialects,
which is all they've said they're doing so far, is far from a
full fork.
I see no reason for you to come down so hard on such
experimentation.
Because original post had no learning context at all. I would
glad
Am Mon, 8 Sep 2014 20:27:41 +0300
schrieb ketmar via Digitalmars-d :
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 18:55:46 +0200
> Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
> > but #arr looks very unusual
> not for those who loves Lua. ;-)
... an Perl and Bash, yes.
--
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 09/08/2014 04:58 PM, "Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
" wrote:
comics are not on topic,
The topic of a comic is arbitrary.
either "let's start crusade!". OP just
asking what private patches other has. that's all.
it's exactly like my thread about code cleanup, which turned to "github
or GTFO" thread, yet i just informed people and don't even use word
"github" there.
i
Am Mon, 08 Sep 2014 23:31:47 +
schrieb "Dicebot" :
> […] fuck […] off-topic flamewar […] quite intentional.
> […] won't let you do that easily […] off-topic bullshit
> […] shooting people […] don't buy this […] attention whore
> […] troll […] retard […] You are crossing the line
> […] screw th
On Tuesday, 9 September 2014 at 00:22:49 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Mon, 08 Sep 2014 23:31:47 +
schrieb "Dicebot" :
[…] fuck […] off-topic flamewar […] quite intentional.
[…] won't let you do that easily […] off-topic bullshit
[…] shooting people […] don't buy this […] attention whore
[…] t
Am Mon, 08 Sep 2014 19:12:22 +0200
schrieb Timon Gehr :
> On 09/08/2014 07:00 PM, Marco Leise wrote:
> > Am Mon, 8 Sep 2014 18:34:10 +0300
> > schrieb ketmar via Digitalmars-d :
> >
> >> On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:25:07 +0200
> >> Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >>
> >>> int square(int x)=>x*x;
receive on
topic responses to your threads?
I only want to receive a response on this thread from community
members who are willing to share their patches! Your contribution to
this thread is counter productive.
And I don't give a
Shall we keep it civil please. Thanks. -- Andrei
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 02:41:25 +0200
Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> I have to say, that was clever. I really didn't notice the
> wrong syntax until now. It doesn't get my vote though to keep
> some uniformness in function/method definitions. One time fire
> and forget lambdas are something d
and* *open*
*code*. or at least be ashamed of what we are doing.
If actually using any of those patches (or recommending to do it)
was never your intention, I apologize. However you have earlier
made several comment about maintaing own set of patches for
things that don't seem to be accept
On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:44:30 +
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> However you have earlier
> made several comment about maintaing own set of patches for
> things that don't seem to be accepted upstream
i'm still doing this, 'cause i found some things inconsistent
based
on existing patches. But it has nothing like that, instead
focusing on "here is what I like to change in D so I keep
local patches it" side of things. And this is really bad.
There may not yet be a learning context for the overall
community, but there is for the small group
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
