b.com/ariovistus/pyd
https://github.com/ariovistus/pyd/wiki
https://github.com/kaleidicassociates/autowrap
makes using PyD a little simpler.
b.com/ariovistus/pyd
https://github.com/ariovistus/pyd/wiki
Sorry I meant to post this link for the wiki:
https://wiki.dlang.org/Programming_in_D_for_Python_Programmers
ovide I am new to D I
have been learning python for some time and thought Python and
D would work well together.
Also are there any Projects using it yet I would like to get
involved and contribute if possible.
Try this repo:
https://github.com/ariovistus/pyd
https://github.com/ariovistu
On Wednesday, 12 July 2006 at 23:35:55 UTC, Kirk McDonald wrote:
If anyone's interested, I just did some fairly major
refactoring of how Pyd wraps functions. I've essentially
written my own tuple/metaprogramming library. (Well, at least a
limited one.) I'm not sure if the
I have been trying to create a python extention using pyd and
would like my D code to use an external library, in this case
D-YAML. is there a way to tell pyd to include the lib when
building the extention?
On Saturday, 2 December 2017 at 09:12:07 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
On Friday, 1 December 2017 at 13:30:21 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Hi.
I'd like to get PyD working on Windows 64. I think it's
probably just a simple linking / library problem, but don't
have time to work on it m
On Saturday, 2 December 2017 at 09:12:07 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
On Friday, 1 December 2017 at 13:30:21 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Hi.
I'd like to get PyD working on Windows 64. I think it's
probably just a simple linking / library problem, but don't
have time to work on it m
On Friday, 1 December 2017 at 13:30:21 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Hi.
I'd like to get PyD working on Windows 64. I think it's
probably just a simple linking / library problem, but don't
have time to work on it myself right now. If somebody would be
interested in helping, w
On Friday, 1 December 2017 at 13:30:21 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Hi.
I'd like to get PyD working on Windows 64. I think it's
probably just a simple linking / library problem, but don't
have time to work on it myself right now. If somebody would be
interested in helping, w
Hi.
I'd like to get PyD working on Windows 64. I think it's probably
just a simple linking / library problem, but don't have time to
work on it myself right now. If somebody would be interested in
helping, we could pay for help on this.
laeeth at
kaleidic.io
Thanks.
Laeeth.
On 10/06/14 23:32, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Another thing I was envisioning is a web page that shows test results
for each combination so that it is easy for a casual user to determine
pyd's status. Does buildbot have this sort of thing?
Travis CI does have that. But it currently doesn't support
On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 14:39:25 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
If you can spare the time / HW resources, I'd probably go with
Vagrant and Buildbot, but then again I would since I'm familiar
with both.
Atila
I stumbled on vagrant a few months ago but haven't had a chance
to play with it yet. I
6-09 at 22:37 +, Ellery Newcomer via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
So pyd is at the point where it really needs some sort of test
suite runner. It's kind of complicated since I need to test
against
* multiple versions of dmd/ldc/gdc
* multiple versions of python (2.4 - 3.4, but I'm thinking
On 6/10/14, 1:31 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 22:37 +, Ellery Newcomer via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
So pyd is at the point where it really needs some sort of test
suite runner. It's kind of complicated since I need to test
against
* multiple versions o
On 10/06/14 00:37, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
So pyd is at the point where it really needs some sort of test suite
runner. It's kind of complicated since I need to test against
* multiple versions of dmd/ldc/gdc
* multiple versions of python (2.4 - 3.4, but I'm thinking of dropping
2.4 an
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 22:37 +, Ellery Newcomer via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> So pyd is at the point where it really needs some sort of test
> suite runner. It's kind of complicated since I need to test
> against
>
> * multiple versions of dmd/ldc/gdc
> * multiple versio
On Monday, 9 June 2014 at 22:37:20 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
So pyd is at the point where it really needs some sort of test
suite runner. It's kind of complicated since I need to test
against
* multiple versions of dmd/ldc/gdc
* multiple versions of python (2.4 - 3.4, but I'm t
On Monday, 9 June 2014 at 22:37:20 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
So pyd is at the point where it really needs some sort of test
suite runner.
* multiple versions of python (2.4 - 3.4, but I'm thinking of
dropping 2.4 and 2.5 this year)
Well done! -If you want a suggestion I think you s
So pyd is at the point where it really needs some sort of test
suite runner. It's kind of complicated since I need to test
against
* multiple versions of dmd/ldc/gdc
* multiple versions of python (2.4 - 3.4, but I'm thinking of
dropping 2.4 and 2.5 this year)
* redhat, ubuntu, os
On Saturday, 30 November 2013 at 05:51:43 UTC, Ellery Newcomer
wrote:
use dmd. ldc doesn't support building shared libraries.
also, use 2.063. I think compilation broke in 2.064 for some
reason. I plan on fixing this next week.
On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 at 16:37:36 UTC, Neal Becker wrote:
Just trying PyD on fedora 19 x86_64.
I install ldc (and friends) using yum.
Then I did hg clone https://bitbucket.org/ariovistus/pyd
Now after python setup.py install --user, I go to try hello:
[nbecker@nbecker7 hello
Just trying PyD on fedora 19 x86_64.
I install ldc (and friends) using yum.
Then I did hg clone https://bitbucket.org/ariovistus/pyd
Now after python setup.py install --user, I go to try hello:
[nbecker@nbecker7 hello]$ python tsetup.py build --compiler=ldc
running build
running build_ext
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 19:32 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
> Mmph. I've tried several build systems with pyd, and at the end of the
> day, it only makes it that more difficult to set up a vm for testing,
> hence CeleriD.
OK, I will investigate more, thanks.
> If people
On 05/14/2013 08:05 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
I wonder if it might be useful to ensure that SCons can be used as
well / instead of CeleriD to compile the D code into a suitable form to
be a CPython extensions?
Mmph. I've tried several build systems with pyd, and at the end of the
da
On 05/14/2013 10:05 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
> Given that there is non-zero interest in using D to create extensions
> for CPython, I wonder if it would be beneficial to spend a little time
> updating all the pages on dsource to point at what is clearly the
> mainline which is on mercurial.
>
> I
Given that there is non-zero interest in using D to create extensions
for CPython, I wonder if it would be beneficial to spend a little time
updating all the pages on dsource to point at what is clearly the
mainline which is on mercurial.
I wonder if it might be useful to ensure that SCons can be
On 02/19/2013 06:55 AM, mrkafk wrote:
First I apologize for bringing this topic up here, because that's
obviously not quite correct forum - but can't find info anywhere else..
Is there any active forum/mailing list for PyD?
Afraid not.
This seems to have been abandoned:
http://d
On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 14:55:03 UTC, mrkafk wrote:
First I apologize for bringing this topic up here, because
that's obviously not quite correct forum - but can't find info
anywhere else..
Is there any active forum/mailing list for PyD?
This seems to have been abando
First I apologize for bringing this topic up here, because that's
obviously not quite correct forum - but can't find info anywhere
else..
Is there any active forum/mailing list for PyD?
This seems to have been abandoned:
http://dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=95
But bitbucke
On Thursday, 15 November 2012 at 02:51:08 UTC, Ellery Newcomer
wrote:
Just tried building a shared library on linux with dmd (and
calling it from C).
It works! Holy crap, it even runs my static constructors and
unittests! I only had to screw with the linking process a
little bit!
It doesn't
Just tried building a shared library on linux with dmd (and calling it
from C).
It works! Holy crap, it even runs my static constructors and unittests!
I only had to screw with the linking process a little bit!
It doesn't work for x64, though. Gives me
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/dmd/libphobos2.
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 14:08 -0800, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
> Never used ctypes. How difficult would it be to get python
> objects/functions to the extension side?
As long as the code compiles to a shared object/dynamic link library and
presents C-linkage entry points, Python code can call the
On 11/09/2012 11:33 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
What is guaranteed now is that the ctypes package works in CPython and
PyPy and would seem to be the right "API" for people interested in using
Python with D. If the ctypes overhead is significant to the execution
then writing a native code extension
On Saturday, 10 November 2012 at 06:22:57 UTC, Rob T wrote:
I'm also gambling that the dll issue will be resolved in a
reasonable amount of time, as the apps I'm building in D will
require it. I'll need ddl's that are dynamically linked, and
ddl's used as plugins that are dymaically loaded.
I
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 16:31 -0800, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
> He's been writing python extensions in C; he *should* be happy :)
It is true that most people just use Cython these days.
Or they are using NumPy, Numba, etc.
> btw, what's the status on druntime support for share
hould* be happy
:)
btw, what's the status on druntime support for shared
libraries? Pyd is kind of walking on thin ice until this is
straightened out.
I'm also gambling that the dll issue will be resolved in a
reasonable amount of time, as the apps I'm building in D will
r
for shared libraries? Pyd is
kind of walking on thin ice until this is straightened out.
On 02/23/2012 11:40 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
it seems not to be compiling with the 2.058 front end
3 (4 but for a segfault during shutdown) out of the 5 examples compile
with 2.058 and run!
On Thursday, February 23, 2012 23:52:09 Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 11:40 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> > Well, I can't make any promises, but you can try this:
> >
> > https://bitbucket.org/ariovistus/pyd
> >
> > it seems not to be compiling wi
On 02/23/2012 11:40 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Well, I can't make any promises, but you can try this:
https://bitbucket.org/ariovistus/pyd
it seems not to be compiling with the 2.058 front end, but I think it
should with the 2.057 front end and ldc.
crumb, I take that back
Anyone kno
Well, I can't make any promises, but you can try this:
https://bitbucket.org/ariovistus/pyd
it seems not to be compiling with the 2.058 front end, but I think it
should with the 2.057 front end and ldc.
python headers are updated to support 2.5 thru 2.7, though I only tested
with 2.7
I think PyD is all there is. But it seems like someone around here
(other than me) was trying to bring it back to life. Can't remember who
or if I was dreaming, though.
When I tried to do this, I found I had problems building shared
libraries for any compiler but ldc (thus no windows su
42 matches
Mail list logo
