"bearophile" wrote in message
news:aknmrnhodledtmfyp...@forum.dlang.org...
> Dicebot:
>
>> Can you link his comment? That sounds weird.
>
> It was years ago, maybe more than three years ago. It's not easy to find.
> I have found discussions about this topic, but not comments from Walter:
>
> htt
On 2013-06-30 20:00, deadalnix wrote:
Compiler as a library, usual rant, no need to repeat.
Agree.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Well, at least point about testing does not really matter anymore
- it is automated ;) I wonder what Walter does think about it now
- libclang has pretty much proven how awesome compiler front-end
as library can be. Was one of main reasons for me to switch from
gcc for daily C++ stuff.
On Sun
On Sunday, 30 June 2013 at 15:31:19 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
On Sunday, 30 June 2013 at 13:31:02 UTC, bearophile wrote:
cal:
I uploaded a small demo of a D repl i've been playing with,
In past I have seen D repls, they come and then they fade
away, regardless how much work they have required to
Dicebot:
Can you link his comment? That sounds weird.
It was years ago, maybe more than three years ago. It's not easy
to find. I have found discussions about this topic, but not
comments from Walter:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/D_Compiler_as_a_Library_164027.html
Am 30.06.2013 18:36, schrieb bearophile:
> David:
>
>> Crazy idea... CTFE is basically done with a D interpreter isn't it?
>> Can't this be used as library to implement a REPL?
>
> In a REPL you want persistent state too. CTFE deletes its state once
> it's done.
Yeah I know, but having a complet
On Sunday, 30 June 2013 at 16:36:42 UTC, bearophile wrote:
And in a past request of mine I've seen that Walter is against
the idea of "compiler as a library" (as in C#).
Can you link his comment? That sounds weird.
David:
Crazy idea... CTFE is basically done with a D interpreter isn't
it?
Can't this be used as library to implement a REPL?
In a REPL you want persistent state too. CTFE deletes its state
once it's done.
And in a past request of mine I've seen that Walter is against
the idea of "compile
Am 30.06.2013 15:31, schrieb bearophile:
> cal:
>
>> I uploaded a small demo of a D repl i've been playing with,
>
> In past I have seen D repls, they come and then they fade away,
> regardless how much work they have required to be created, or how much
> refined they are. The fact they have appe
On Sunday, 30 June 2013 at 15:35:11 UTC, bearophile wrote:
SomeDude:
It's cool, but it's yet another tool to maintain. Thus their
lack of enthusiasm I guess. Unless someone comes forward and
is ready to maintain the repl, in which case I think everyone
would applaud.
I understand and I agre
SomeDude:
It's cool, but it's yet another tool to maintain. Thus their
lack of enthusiasm I guess. Unless someone comes forward and is
ready to maintain the repl, in which case I think everyone
would applaud.
I understand and I agree, thank you for putting me back on the
ground. Also, I rem
On Sunday, 30 June 2013 at 13:31:02 UTC, bearophile wrote:
cal:
I uploaded a small demo of a D repl i've been playing with,
In past I have seen D repls, they come and then they fade away,
regardless how much work they have required to be created, or
how much refined they are. The fact they
On Sunday, 30 June 2013 at 13:31:02 UTC, bearophile wrote:
cal:
I uploaded a small demo of a D repl i've been playing with,
In past I have seen D repls, they come and then they fade away,
regardless how much work they have required to be created, or
how much refined they are. The fact they
cal:
I uploaded a small demo of a D repl i've been playing with,
In past I have seen D repls, they come and then they fade away,
regardless how much work they have required to be created, or how
much refined they are. The fact they have appeared more than once
shows some persons desire them
On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 00:13:29 UTC, bearophile wrote:
cal:
What compiler version are you using? I'm not seeing any
problems with 2.063, I haven't tried a more recent version yet.
I am using dmd, and I compile it almost daily. I suspect it's
not a matter of compiler version, but it's a
cal:
What compiler version are you using? I'm not seeing any
problems with 2.063, I haven't tried a more recent version yet.
I am using dmd, and I compile it almost daily. I suspect it's not
a matter of compiler version, but it's a matter of dub using or
not using -property in compiling code
Am 26.06.2013 04:47, schrieb cal:
> I uploaded a small demo of a D repl i've been playing with, might be of
> some interest. It's not a robust bit of code, and is not my idea of a
> proper repl, but shows some possibilities. The video shows the repl
> running as a web server (using vibe) with a bro
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 12:19:35 UTC, bearophile wrote:
- is type x the same as print typeof(x) ?
No, when it first compiles a user-defined type, the repl
recursively maps out the type's structure. It does this to allow
using 'print/type' without needing to do a compile, since these
Sönke Ludwig:
Do you have the latest version of DUB installed?
I have installed it right to try the D repl. I have installed the
latest Windows version here, precompiled binaries (I think that
it's better to show only the latest versions in a table, and all
the older versions in a different
Am 26.06.2013 14:19, schrieb bearophile:
> Running dmd (compile)...
> ...\dub\packages\pegged-master\pegged\dynamic\grammar.d(245): Error:
not a property eps
> ...\dub\packages\pegged-master\pegged\dynamic\grammar.d(418): Error:
not a property fail
Do you have the latest version of DUB install
It looks very nice. I like the interactive shell in Python and
Haskell. Even languages like Scala enjoy it. The importance of a
good REPL can't be underestimated. I'd like a good repl in the
standard D distribution (despite the installation with dub is
easy).
Notes:
- Regarding the input and
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 04:29:31 UTC, Tyro[17] wrote:
You suggest that it is not your idea of a proper repl. Is there
plans of returning to the drawing board to develop that idea
from scratch?
I think a better solution IMO is to hook up a D front-end to
LLVM's jit compiler, but I don't
On 6/25/13 10:47 PM, cal wrote:
I uploaded a small demo of a D repl i've been playing with, might be of
some interest. It's not a robust bit of code, and is not my idea of a
proper repl, but shows some possibilities. The video shows the repl
running as a web server (using vibe) with a browser cli
23 matches
Mail list logo
