On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 05:38, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Well, if that's a rough rough
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:23:18 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Leandro Lucarella, el 29 de octubre a las 13:21 me escribiste:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 28 de octubre a las 23:38 me escribiste:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full
Michael Rynn wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:23:18 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Leandro Lucarella, el 29 de octubre a las 13:21 me escribiste:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 28 de octubre a las 23:38 me escribiste:
It's a rough rough draft,
Jason House wrote:
Don Wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Justin Johansson, el 30 de octubre a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Actually, I think I like that better than 'traits'.
-Lars
I'm in agreement with whoever suggested 'meta' or just about anything else
except 'traits'.
'meta', whilst
Don wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Don Wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Justin Johansson, el 30 de octubre a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Actually, I think I like that better than 'traits'.
-Lars
I'm in agreement with whoever suggested 'meta' or just about
anything else except 'traits'.
'meta',
Don, el 2 de noviembre a las 11:14 me escribiste:
Jason House wrote:
Don Wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Justin Johansson, el 30 de octubre a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Actually, I think I like that better than 'traits'.
-Lars
I'm in agreement with whoever suggested 'meta' or just about
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Don wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Don Wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Justin Johansson, el 30 de octubre a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Actually, I think I like that better than 'traits'.
-Lars
I'm in agreement with whoever suggested 'meta' or just about
anything else
Don wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Don wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Don Wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Justin Johansson, el 30 de octubre a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Actually, I think I like that better than 'traits'.
-Lars
I'm in agreement with whoever suggested 'meta' or just about
Don wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Don Wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Justin Johansson, el 30 de octubre a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Actually, I think I like that better than 'traits'.
-Lars
I'm in agreement with whoever suggested 'meta' or just about
anything else except 'traits'.
'meta',
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote
Saaa wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about
void assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that
Mike Parker wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
p.28 line 16:
symbols in less bits
should be
symbols in
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote
Saaa wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about
void assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I'm not sure I see the value in being able to rename that. That's like
making sure people can rename for.
I don't either, that's just a nice side effect for people who dislike
whatever name is decided on.
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:07:14 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Apparently the need was felt strongly enough that a library made it into
Boost that does exactly initialization of collections (and vector in
particular), in spite of being based on a very questionable
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
p.28 line 16:
symbols in less bits
should be
symbols in fewer bits
Max Samukha:
While those are important, I am still not totally convinced that
dynamic arrays initialized from literals occur often in production
code. It remains a matter of opinion.
In script-like code literals are common. So when you consider your production
code you must count that
Mike Parker wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
p.28 line 16:
symbols in less bits
should be
symbols in
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Sure I haven't come across anything that someone else hasn't already pointed
duser4ever wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Sure I haven't come across anything that someone else hasn't
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about void
assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask,
I made this change to the incriminated paragraph:
===
Such uninitialized
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about
void assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask,
I made this change to the incriminated paragraph:
Saaa wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about void
assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask, I
made this change
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 29 de octubre a las 16:06 me escribiste:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
What I cannot for the life of me understand is WHY the double
underscores? What's wrong with just traits?
Because D needed the feature, and it wasn't clear what a good syntax
for it
Don wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:12:51 +0300, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Don wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:12:51 +0300, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
Don:
traits.compiles(XXX)
traits.typeid(TTT)
traits.stringof(T)
traits.allMembers(T)
traits.error(message);
Cute.
Simpler alternative, the dot isn't necessary:
traits_compiles(XXX)
traits_typeid(TTT)
traits_stringof(T)
traits_allmembers(T)
traits_error(message);
Or, more uniformly (all D
Op Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:44:08 +0100 schreef bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com:
Simpler alternative, the dot isn't necessary:
traits_compiles(XXX)
traits_typeid(TTT)
traits_stringof(T)
traits_allmembers(T)
traits_error(message);
Not nice. Bad.
bearophile wrote:
Don:
traits.compiles(XXX)
traits.typeid(TTT)
traits.stringof(T)
traits.allMembers(T)
traits.error(message);
Cute.
Simpler alternative, the dot isn't necessary:
traits_compiles(XXX)
traits_typeid(TTT)
traits_stringof(T)
traits_allmembers(T)
traits_error(message);
That is
Don wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Don wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:12:51 +0300, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
I still think is expressions
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about void
assignment?
p18. What is unsafe about implicit conversion of static to dynamic array?
Meaning getting a dynamic array pointing to a stack allocated
array.
Any
Max Samukha Wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:30:35 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
It's me as well. The decision didn't go without a fight (I had your
viewpoint and Walter didn't). He convinced me with two arguments. One is
that 90% of the time you actually
Justin Johansson, el 30 de octubre a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Actually, I think I like that better than 'traits'.
-Lars
I'm in agreement with whoever suggested 'meta' or just about anything else
except 'traits'.
'meta', whilst perhaps an overloaded keyword, is still much more
Lars T. Kyllingstad, el 30 de octubre a las 08:55 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 29 de octubre a las 16:06 me escribiste:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
What I cannot for the life of me understand is WHY the double
underscores? What's wrong with just traits?
Because D
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about void
assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask,
I made this change to the incriminated paragraph:
===
Such uninitialized
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about
void assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask,
I made this change to the incriminated paragraph:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Justin Johansson, el 30 de octubre a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Actually, I think I like that better than 'traits'.
-Lars
I'm in agreement with whoever suggested 'meta' or just about anything else
except 'traits'.
'meta', whilst perhaps an overloaded keyword, is still
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
I still think is
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about void
assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask, I
made this change to the
Saaa wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about void
assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask, I
made this change
Don Wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Justin Johansson, el 30 de octubre a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Actually, I think I like that better than 'traits'.
-Lars
I'm in agreement with whoever suggested 'meta' or just about anything else
except 'traits'.
'meta', whilst perhaps an
Don wrote:
I'm starting to think we need a
separate namespace for the CT stuff.
D.compiles(XXX)
D.typeof(foo)
D.stringof(T)
D.allMembers(T)
That's not bad. Can't be 'D', though, has to look like a keyword. Maybe
something like 'traits' instead. In exchange, get rid of the
Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com wrote in message
news:hcg0qr$fc...@digitalmars.com...
Don wrote:
I'm starting to think we need a
separate namespace for the CT stuff.
D.compiles(XXX)
D.typeof(foo)
D.stringof(T)
D.allMembers(T)
That's not bad. Can't be 'D', though, has
Pelle Månsson wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Your Hallå Värd! should be Hallå Värld!, to be Swedish. D:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Maybe I haven't been paying attention lately, but shouldn't
Also, no mention about .dup not being a deep dup.
crp
p20. 40 words?
those where for myself, to check
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Maybe I haven't been paying
Robert Jacques wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:38:33 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Thanks for the excerpt! I've only had the time to give it a brief skim
so far, but it's looking
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
It's a very pleasant read, and it looks good. I guess I'll have to buy
the book. :) I
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s
article
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Your Hallå Värd! should be Hallå Värld!, to be Swedish. D:
Also, I am wondering, why
Andrei Alexandrescu:
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
So far I've just taken a look, I'll read it when I can. I can see several
warnings in red.
The look of the text is really nice! Elegant, and the images are good and
necessary. Are you going to write a
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
I still think is expressions are a glaring problem. Somewhere in the text, you
use
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
I still think is expressions are a glaring problem. Somewhere in the text,
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:12:51 +0300, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:12:51 +0300, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:12:51 +0300, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet wrote:
I don't think he uses is(typeof(...)) in the text. The code snippets in
question are marked Note: normally the code below would not be
included..., and I suppose he's
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:32:51 +0300, Jason House
jason.james.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:12:51 +0300, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet wrote:
I don't think he uses is(typeof(...)) in the text. The code snippets
in
question are
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:12:51 +0300, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
I still think is expressions are a glaring problem. Somewhere in the
text,
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf Any feedback is welcome.
Thanks!
So far I've just taken a look, I'll read it when I can. I can see
several warnings in red. The look of the text is really nice!
Elegant, and the images are good and necessary. Are you
Pelle Månsson wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Your Hallå Värd! should be Hallå Värld!, to be Swedish. D:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s
article
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
It's a very pleasant read, and it looks good. I guess I'll
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I did consider Inconsolata seriously, but I had to reject it (I forgot
why; all I can remember was that it was a good reason).
A problem with Inconsolata that I have forgotten to tell you is that there
isn't a true bold version yet, so the bold characters don't have the
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I did consider Inconsolata seriously, but I had to reject it (I forgot
why; all I can remember was that it was a good reason).
A problem with Inconsolata that I have forgotten to tell you is that there
isn't a true bold version yet, so the bold
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Maybe I haven't been paying attention lately, but shouldn't
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Makes me want to read the rest!
Will we get the electronic version with the paper
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 28 de octubre a las 23:38 me escribiste:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
It looks very nice. A small error in 4.1.7 first code
Leandro Lucarella, el 29 de octubre a las 13:21 me escribiste:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 28 de octubre a las 23:38 me escribiste:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is
Also, no mention about .dup not being a deep dup.
Saaa wrote
Also, no mention about .dup not being a deep dup.
Sorry, should've been attached to my response
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com wrote:
Leandro Lucarella, el 29 de octubre a las 13:21 me escribiste:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 28 de octubre a las 23:38 me escribiste:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and
crp
p20. 40 words?
those where for myself, to check
Saaa wrote:
Will we get the electronic version with the paper version?
I'm not exactly sure how things will roll out. Probably yes.
p2. typo: eenlists
p9. Is it ok to expect the order of an array expression to be like in
foreach ?
Maybe mention a[] = b.
p11. typo: no(t) palindrome
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 28 de octubre a las 23:38 me escribiste:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
It looks very nice. A small error
Saaa wrote:
Also, no mention about .dup not being a deep dup.
I've put this on my todo list, but it's difficult. At this point people
only know about statements and expressions, so it would be a bit
difficult to introduce the subtleties of shallow vs. deep copying. I
guess I'll have to do
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Leandro Lucarella, el 29 de octubre a las 13:21 me escribiste:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 28 de octubre a las 23:38 me escribiste:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Maybe I haven't been paying
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Pelle Månsson wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Your Hallå Värd! should be Hallå
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Maybe I
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:38:33 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
Still reading,
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 29 de octubre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Leandro Lucarella, el 29 de octubre a las 13:21 me escribiste:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 28 de octubre a las 23:38 me escribiste:
BTW, it looks like array literals will be dynamic arrays, from the code in
Robert Jacques wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:38:33 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 29 de octubre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Leandro Lucarella, el 29 de octubre a las 13:21 me escribiste:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 28 de octubre a las 23:38 me escribiste:
BTW, it looks like array literals will be dynamic
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Thanks for the excerpt! I've only had the time to give it a brief skim
so far, but it's looking
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Thanks Andrei, that was an excellent read.
Some comments:
Page 102, line 23. I'm not a native English speaker, but it seems like you're
missing a such in the sentence there is a thing as a
Page 116, line 13: shouldn't array
Tom S wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Thanks for the excerpt! I've only had the time to give it a brief skim
so far,
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:30:35 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
It's me as well. The decision didn't go without a fight (I had your
viewpoint and Walter didn't). He convinced me with two arguments. One is
that 90% of the time you actually want T[], not T[n].
The
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:59:13 +0300, Max Samukha spam...@d-coding.com
wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:30:35 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
It's me as well. The decision didn't go without a fight (I had your
viewpoint and Walter didn't). He convinced me with two
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 29 de octubre a las 13:30 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 29 de octubre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Leandro Lucarella, el 29 de octubre a las 13:21 me escribiste:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 28 de octubre a las 23:38
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome.
Manuel wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Thanks Andrei, that was an excellent read.
Some comments:
Page 102, line 23. I'm not a native English speaker, but it seems like you're missing a
such in the sentence there is a thing as a
Page 116, line 13:
Max Samukha wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:30:35 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
It's me as well. The decision didn't go without a fight (I had your
viewpoint and Walter didn't). He convinced me with two arguments. One is
that 90% of the time you actually want
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
What I cannot for the life of me understand is WHY the double
underscores? What's wrong with just traits?
Because D needed the feature, and it wasn't clear what a good syntax for
it would be. So __traits is a put something out there, make it work, if
it proves its
Walter Bright, el 29 de octubre a las 16:06 me escribiste:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
What I cannot for the life of me understand is WHY the double
underscores? What's wrong with just traits?
Because D needed the feature, and it wasn't clear what a good syntax
for it would be. So __traits
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
Andrei
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
