On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 18:46:58 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 09:08:26 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2015-01-26 08:35, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I think we should just import jquery into the dlang.org repo.
External
dependencies always end up in
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 18:41:09 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Why not create a bugzilla section for website and forum so it
is easier to report glitches and enhancement requests in a way
that you will quickly see without distraction?
Bugzilla has a Website component.
It should say
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 09:08:26 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-26 08:35, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I think we should just import jquery into the dlang.org repo.
External
dependencies always end up in these kinds of ugly situations.
The advantage of using a CDN is
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 03:56:37 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Hi.
This thread turned to topics of higher importance than mere
cosmetics.
Few miscellaneous thoughts.
Why not create a bugzilla section for website and forum so it is
easier to report glitches and enhancement
On 2015-01-26 08:35, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I think we should just import jquery into the dlang.org repo. External
dependencies always end up in these kinds of ugly situations.
The advantage of using a CDN is that browser will most likely already
have loaded, in this case
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 20:08:44 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 18:41:09 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Why not create a bugzilla section for website and forum so it
is easier to report glitches and enhancement requests in a way
that you will quickly see without
When one checks out the D community / forums, one is confronted
with a long list of forums, most of which fall into the
categories: not relating to D, defunct, very low activity.
This is initially a bit confusing, and is not very crisp.
Is it worth having only the active ones displayed with a
On 26/01/2015 11:41 a.m., Laeeth Isharc wrote:
When one checks out the D community / forums, one is confronted with a
long list of forums, most of which fall into the categories: not
relating to D, defunct, very low activity.
This is initially a bit confusing, and is not very crisp.
Is it
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 03:17:54 +, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 03:14:00 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:36:29 +, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 02:13:44 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:00:01 +, Laeeth Isharc
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 03:17:55 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 03:14:00 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:36:29 +, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 02:13:44 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:00:01 +, Laeeth
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 19:37:00 -0800, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Shouldn't it be expanded by default and collapsed if JS is available?
my uneducated guess is that collapser is not using jquery, so it was
able to successfully collaspe the whole thing. and then expander is
using jquery,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 03:35:02 +, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I see. Your issue is not that JS is disabled, it is that you are
selectively blocking components of the webpage.
As with any system, it is not unusual that it stops working as designed
when you rip out arbitrary parts of it.
I
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 03:43:53 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 19:37:00 -0800, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Shouldn't it be expanded by default and collapsed if JS is
available?
my uneducated guess is that collapser is not using jquery, so
it was
able to successfully
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 03:56:36 +, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 03:43:53 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 19:37:00 -0800, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Shouldn't it be expanded by default and collapsed if JS is available?
my uneducated guess is that
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 03:14:00 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:36:29 +, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 02:13:44 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:00:01 +, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Imagine you move from a javascript browser to one
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 03:31:15 UTC, ketmar wrote:
i don't really know what goes wrong there, nor i want to
investigate the
issue. maybe it's due to blocked google sites (same origin
policy+strict
no requests to google policy) plus flawed script blocker
which misses
some page scripts
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 03:34:56AM +, Kiith-Sa via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 03:17:55 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 03:14:00 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:36:29 +, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 03:35:03 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
I see no reason to support such a configuration in principle,
but for this particular case, I think the fix will be simple.
Actually, I take that back. There are good reasons to support
such a situation, the biggest of
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 02:36:30 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 02:13:44 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:00:01 +, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Imagine you move from a javascript browser to one without
dlang.org is imfunctional without js, so there is
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:36:29 +, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 02:13:44 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:00:01 +, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Imagine you move from a javascript browser to one without
dlang.org is imfunctional without js, so there is no
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 03:54:10AM +, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 03:35:03 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I see no reason to support such a configuration in principle, but for
this particular case, I think the fix will be simple.
Actually, I
On 1/25/15 2:41 PM, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
When one checks out the D community / forums, one is confronted with a
long list of forums, most of which fall into the categories: not
relating to D, defunct, very low activity.
This is initially a bit confusing, and is not very crisp.
Is it worth
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 00:29:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/25/15 2:41 PM, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
When one checks out the D community / forums, one is
confronted with a
long list of forums, most of which fall into the categories:
not
relating to D, defunct, very low activity.
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 01:55:32 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 26/01/2015 12:42 p.m., Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Sunday, 25 January 2015 at 22:45:53 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 26/01/2015 11:41 a.m., Laeeth Isharc wrote:
When one checks out the D community / forums, one is
confronted
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:00:01 +, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Imagine you move from a javascript browser to one without
dlang.org is imfunctional without js, so there is no sense to make
anything else working right without js.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday, 25 January 2015 at 22:45:53 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 26/01/2015 11:41 a.m., Laeeth Isharc wrote:
When one checks out the D community / forums, one is
confronted with a
long list of forums, most of which fall into the categories:
not
relating to D, defunct, very low activity.
On 26/01/2015 12:42 p.m., Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Sunday, 25 January 2015 at 22:45:53 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 26/01/2015 11:41 a.m., Laeeth Isharc wrote:
When one checks out the D community / forums, one is confronted with a
long list of forums, most of which fall into the categories:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 02:13:44 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:00:01 +, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Imagine you move from a javascript browser to one without
dlang.org is imfunctional without js, so there is no sense to
make
anything else working right without js.
dlang.org
28 matches
Mail list logo
