Re: druntime unit test failures on FreeBSD

2015-04-21 Thread Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
In any case, I just reported the bug: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14476 I guess that the fact that it wasn't found sooner just goes to show that not many druntime developers are using FreeBSD (though that's not exactly surprising). - Jonahan M Davis

Re: druntime unit test failures on FreeBSD

2015-04-20 Thread Dan Olson via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 19 April 2015 at 07:36:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: I am consistently seeing this when I try and run druntime's unit tests on FreeBSD for either 2.067 or master: 0.000s PASS release64 object 0.000s PASS release64 core.atomic 0.008s PASS release64 core.bitop 0.000s PASS release64

Re: druntime unit test failures on FreeBSD

2015-04-20 Thread Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, April 20, 2015 20:44:48 Dan Olson via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Sunday, 19 April 2015 at 07:36:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: I am consistently seeing this when I try and run druntime's unit tests on FreeBSD for either 2.067 or master: 0.000s PASS release64 object 0.000s

Re: druntime unit test failures on FreeBSD

2015-04-20 Thread Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, April 20, 2015 22:33:00 Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote: On 4/20/2015 10:24 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: No idea whether that's related or not. But regardless, that does narrow down the problem some. Still, given how consistent it is on my box (I've _never_

Re: druntime unit test failures on FreeBSD

2015-04-20 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
On 4/20/2015 10:24 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: No idea whether that's related or not. But regardless, that does narrow down the problem some. Still, given how consistent it is on my box (I've _never_ seen it succeed on 2.067 or master), I really have to wonder what the

Re: druntime unit test failures on FreeBSD

2015-04-20 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 20 April 2015 at 05:00:44 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: Hmmm. Maybe it's core-related. I have 6 cores with hyperthreading on my machine - so, effectively 12 - which is more than the autotester has according to that bug report, though if you're running yours in VM, I would assume that

druntime unit test failures on FreeBSD

2015-04-19 Thread Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
I am consistently seeing this when I try and run druntime's unit tests on FreeBSD for either 2.067 or master: 0.000s PASS release64 object 0.000s PASS release64 core.atomic 0.008s PASS release64 core.bitop 0.000s PASS release64 core.checkedint 0.000s PASS release64 core.demangle 0.000s PASS

Re: druntime unit test failures on FreeBSD

2015-04-19 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 19 April 2015 at 07:36:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: I am consistently seeing this when I try and run druntime's unit tests on FreeBSD for either 2.067 or master: 0.000s PASS release64 object 0.000s PASS release64 core.atomic 0.008s PASS release64 core.bitop 0.000s PASS release64

Re: druntime unit test failures on FreeBSD

2015-04-19 Thread Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, April 19, 2015 08:18:55 Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote: I dusted off the old FreeBSD VM I had lying around and tried it out. For me, it hangs in core.thread on FreeBSD 9.1 i386 from a couple years ago when I try to run the druntime unit tests with dmd/druntime HEAD. At least most

Re: druntime unit test failures on FreeBSD

2015-04-19 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 20 April 2015 at 03:21:10 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: LOL. Well, I just switched to FreeBSD from Linux so that I could take proper advantage of ZFS, so I may be stuck looking random problems that pop up on FreeBSD - though this is consistent enough that I'd expect to see it on the

Re: druntime unit test failures on FreeBSD

2015-04-19 Thread Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, April 20, 2015 04:36:35 Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Monday, 20 April 2015 at 03:21:10 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: LOL. Well, I just switched to FreeBSD from Linux so that I could take proper advantage of ZFS, so I may be stuck looking random problems that pop up on