On 2012-05-10 00:05, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:04:59PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Is there a unicode glyph for fist pump? :)
[...]
U+270A?
:-)
Haha :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Gor Gyolchanyan:
My question is, why not allow is operator to be overloadable
for structures?
Or why the bad D compiler doesn't statically refuse the code like:
bool opBinary(string op : is)(typeof(null))
Bye,
bearophile
Because the opBinary is a perfectly valid method. The inability to
overload is only affects the rewrite of A is B to
A.opBinart!`is`(B).
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:46 PM, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Gor Gyolchanyan:
My question is, why not allow is operator to be overloadable for
Gor Gyolchanyan:
Because the opBinary [...]
Thank for your answer, but I don't carte of why the D compiler
accepts that. I only care about the D compiler statically
refusing that.
Bye,
bearophile
On 09/05/12 16:13, bearophile wrote:
Gor Gyolchanyan:
Because the opBinary [...]
Thank for your answer, but I don't carte of why the D compiler accepts
that. I only care about the D compiler statically refusing that.
Bye,
bearophile
I think you're asking for opBinary to be a keyword.
If
On Wed, 09 May 2012 10:13:01 -0400, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Gor Gyolchanyan:
Because the opBinary [...]
Thank for your answer, but I don't carte of why the D compiler accepts
that. I only care about the D compiler statically refusing that.
This also works too:
int
I didn't know structs actually have an is operator. Good to know,
there's a way to memcmp them this way.
But being able to overload it wouldn't do any damage. The overloader
of is should clearly know, that is is an identity check and not an
arbitrary domain-specific equality check.
Overloading is
If is was overloadable, one could make a legitimate reference types
via structs. The opAssign would change the reference, opEquals would
call the opEquals of the referred object, opBinary(string op : `is`)
would compare the references... Just like classes.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Steven
On Wed, 09 May 2012 12:17:30 -0400, Gor Gyolchanyan
gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't know structs actually have an is operator. Good to know,
there's a way to memcmp them this way.
But being able to overload it wouldn't do any damage. The overloader
of is should clearly know, that
On Wed, 09 May 2012 12:21:05 -0400, Gor Gyolchanyan
gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com wrote:
If is was overloadable, one could make a legitimate reference types
via structs. The opAssign would change the reference, opEquals would
call the opEquals of the referred object, opBinary(string op : `is`)
Yeah, that's what I did. I replaced it with opEquals(typeof(null)).
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2012 12:17:30 -0400, Gor Gyolchanyan
gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't know structs actually have an is operator. Good
Btw, I noticed how classes have two different comparison operators
(one for the reference and one for the object), while they have only
one assignment operator (for the reference only),
I think having two assignment operators would be very good for a
number of cases. Combined with a final class
On 2012-05-09 18:13, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This also works too:
int opBinary(string s: booya!)(...)
We could create new operators :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Wed, 09 May 2012 16:25:35 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-05-09 18:13, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This also works too:
int opBinary(string s: booya!)(...)
We could create new operators :)
Is there a unicode glyph for fist pump? :)
-Steve
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:04:59PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2012 16:25:35 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-05-09 18:13, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This also works too:
int opBinary(string s: booya!)(...)
We could create new operators :)
On 05/09/2012 06:05 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:04:59PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2012 16:25:35 -0400, Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-05-09 18:13, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This also works too:
int opBinary(string s: booya!)(...)
I think it would be a unary prefix operator, which returns the
operand's copy, but with double the storage, having the second half -
wasted. :-D
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Matt Soucy mso...@csh.rit.edu wrote:
On 05/09/2012 06:05 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:04:59PM
17 matches
Mail list logo
