https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5223
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
I have made a fork of QTD, the Qt bindings for D, to get it to work with
dmd 2.066:
https://github.com/remy-j-a-moueza/qtd/tree/dmd-2.066
I have only made it to build on Linux (32 bit Ubuntu 14.04) with nearly
no testing.
I haven't updated the examples either, so lots of them
On Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 20:27:59 UTC, Rémy Mouëza wrote:
I have made a fork of QTD, the Qt bindings for D, to get it to
work with dmd 2.066:
https://github.com/remy-j-a-moueza/qtd/tree/dmd-2.066
I have only made it to build on Linux (32 bit Ubuntu 14.04)
with nearly no testing.
I
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5234
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Am 01.08.2013 16:36, schrieb michaelc37:
I compiled against Qt4, I want to try it on Qt5 soon but there is
another annoying issue I discovered when trying to update and compile
all of the qtd exmples: All slot functions must now be declared public..
I'm guessing something changed in traits
On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 at 11:03:33 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
I don't think I got that far as I got a Can't find the D
compiler
problem. It seems the build rebuilds the build in some way but
fails. :-((
The cmake/FindD.cmake script searched for 'ldc' only, not 'ldc2'.
Am on the way home
that in
CMakeLists.txt ldc2 needs D_FLAGS -d-version=QtdCppShared for
the D_IS_LLVM condition.
Here is what i did.
https://bitbucket.org/michaelc37/qtd-experimental/commits/bfd137549ab266cc0c2131be18d8ad955e78a501
I managed to get it to compile with ldc2, after hacking up a fix
for Atomic.d , i did
I'd love to see good working Qt bindings in D. I have considered
resurrecting the QtD project before, but I've been far too busy
and/or lazy to really do anything.
On Wednesday, 14 August 2013 at 07:20:14 UTC, Benjamin Thaut
wrote:
Am 01.08.2013 16:36, schrieb michaelc37:
I compiled against Qt4, I want to try it on Qt5 soon but there
is
another annoying issue I discovered when trying to update and
compile
all of the qtd exmples: All slot functions must
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 05:11 +0200, michaelc37 wrote:
[…]
patched the make file for ldc2, but ran into a problem during
compile with Atomic.d.
Your changes are better than mine so I ditched mine.
I think the llvm_memory_barrier function no longer exists. I
found and tried to apply fixes
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 14:59 +0200, michaelc37 wrote:
for anyone still interested.
after some itch scratching i finally got this to compile with dmd
2.063.2 on ubuntu 64bit -
https://bitbucket.org/michaelc37/qtd-experimental
Hummm…
https://code.google.com/p/qtd/ (which has a Subversion
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 14:59 +0200, michaelc37 wrote:
I have cloned you qtd-experimental to try a build with ldc2. However it
seems cmake/FindD.cmake needs amending to cope with ldc2 in a user
defined place :-(
--
Russel
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 15:28:34 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/qtd/ (which has a Subversion
repository)
clearly points to http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd – which I
guess has a checkoutable (Subversion) repository.
It's a Mercurial repository. QtD moved
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 15:47:02 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 14:59 +0200, michaelc37 wrote:
I have cloned you qtd-experimental to try a build with ldc2.
However it
seems cmake/FindD.cmake needs amending to cope with ldc2 in a
user
defined place :-(
I haven't tried
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 19:08:14 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 15:28:34 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/qtd/ (which has a Subversion
repository)
clearly points to http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd – which
I guess has a checkoutable
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 19:28:41 UTC, michaelc37 wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 15:47:02 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 14:59 +0200, michaelc37 wrote:
I have cloned you qtd-experimental to try a build with ldc2.
However it
seems cmake/FindD.cmake needs amending
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 19:08:14 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 15:28:34 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/qtd/ (which has a Subversion
repository)
clearly points to http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd – which
I guess has a checkoutable
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 14:59 +0200, michaelc37 wrote:
for anyone still interested.
We're here :-)
after some itch scratching i finally got this to compile with dmd
2.063.2 on ubuntu 64bit -
https://bitbucket.org/michaelc37/qtd-experimental
here is what i did.
1) had to create auto_ref
On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 at 17:55:50 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Does it look as if the c++ side expects an extra field in the
beginning of the object?
Yes, I think that's what it looked like.
I'll try to re-run post some data results this weekend.
On 31/07/13 16:26, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 07/31/2013 02:59 PM, michaelc37 wrote:
for anyone still interested.
Very happy to hear that QtD is getting some attention. GUI programming is
quite
a long way from what I usually do, but I think having good and up-to-date Qt
bindings
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 07:57:30 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 14:59 +0200, michaelc37 wrote:
for anyone still interested.
We're here :-)
after some itch scratching i finally got this to compile with
dmd
2.063.2 on ubuntu 64bit -
https://bitbucket.org/michaelc37/qtd
for anyone still interested.
after some itch scratching i finally got this to compile with dmd
2.063.2 on ubuntu 64bit -
https://bitbucket.org/michaelc37/qtd-experimental
here is what i did.
1) had to create auto_ref template for passing rvalues
q: i remember some discussion on this, has
QRect doesn't have a field for height:
http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/blobs/stable/src/corelib/tools/qrect.h#line262
On 7/31/13, michaelc37 michael...@msn.com wrote:
3) modify generator so that structs are passed to cpp exported
functions as pointers.
q: i think that some d structs are objects in cpp (QRect?),
and when cpp read the data the alignment seem to be off(e.g.
height variable data, ended up
On 07/31/2013 02:59 PM, michaelc37 wrote:
for anyone still interested.
Very happy to hear that QtD is getting some attention. GUI programming is quite
a long way from what I usually do, but I think having good and up-to-date Qt
bindings is likely to be very important for D.
On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 at 13:58:10 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
QRect doesn't have a field for height:
http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/blobs/stable/src/corelib/tools/qrect.h#line262
sorry i think i meant y2 (i was writting that post in a hurry)
On Monday, 1 October 2012 at 17:31:11 UTC, Habibutsu wrote:
Anybody knows, project qtd
(http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd/) is alive or died? Last
changes was one year ago. Tracking system contains critical
bugs and nobody fixes. There may be other working bindings for
Qt?
Does it look as if the c++ side expects an extra field in the
beginning of the object?
Hi,
I am having problems compiling qtd on Ubuntu 12.04. QtD needs
Qt4, however I also have Qt5 installed. By default cmake grabs
version 5 which of course produces error messages. In case anyone
knows a quick fix (cmake flag, or a qmake flag etc.) please let
me know. Thanks a million!
On Monday, June 24, 2013 12:04:51 Chris wrote:
Hi,
I am having problems compiling qtd on Ubuntu 12.04. QtD needs
Qt4, however I also have Qt5 installed. By default cmake grabs
version 5 which of course produces error messages. In case anyone
knows a quick fix (cmake flag, or a qmake flag
On Monday, 24 June 2013 at 14:18:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, June 24, 2013 12:04:51 Chris wrote:
Hi,
I am having problems compiling qtd on Ubuntu 12.04. QtD needs
Qt4, however I also have Qt5 installed. By default cmake grabs
version 5 which of course produces error messages
I am very interested in seeing some updated bindings for Qt in D.
I would even like to contribute to a revival project in some
fashion. (Even though thinking about how bindings for Qt's
classes and macros work makes my head spin.) My best experience
in producing a GUI application thus far has
I'm on 64-bit, so I've used the 64-bit patch [1] on bitbucket to
get the compile started. I get a lot of these errors:
[ 3%] Building CXX object
CMakeFiles/cpp_core.dir/cpp/qt_core/QAbstractItemModel_shell.cpp.o
/home/otto/sandbox/qtd/build_dir/build/cpp/qt_core/QAbstractItemModel_shell.cpp
/otto/sandbox/qtd/build_dir/build/cpp/qt_core/QAbstractItemModel_shell.cpp:
In member function ‘virtual QModelIndex
QAbstractItemModel_QtDShell::buddy(const QModelIndex) const’:
/home/otto/sandbox/qtd/build_dir/build/cpp/qt_core/QAbstractItemModel_shell.cpp:83:141:
error: taking address
This project very interest for me. But current QtD is supports
only 4.8 Qt version. If anybody wants to revive this project
and know something about Qt binding specific (this is not
simple c++ binding, as I know. How bind QT_OBJECT macros?), I
can to help him. Anyway, if someone tell me about
Hrm, now I'm getting something else:
/home/otto/aur/qtd/src/qtd/d2/qt/core/QSize.d(62): Error:
function qt.core.QSize.QSize.scale (int w, int h, AspectRatioMode
mode) is not callable using argument types (QSize,AspectRatioMode)
/home/otto/aur/qtd/src/qtd/d2/qt/core/QSize.d(62): Error
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5223
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |All
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5622
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5622
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5223
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 23:52 +0200, Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
On Monday, 1 October 2012 at 17:31:11 UTC, Habibutsu wrote:
Anybody knows, project qtd
(http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd/) is alive or died? Last
changes was one year ago. Tracking system contains critical
bugs and nobody
On Wednesday, 3 October 2012 at 08:13:59 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Presumably the Qt5 release could be an impetus to restart active
evolution of QtD? QtQuick doesn't really do it for me given
QtDesigner, but…
This all depends on enough people feeling the need to scratch
their related itch
On Monday, 1 October 2012 at 17:31:11 UTC, Habibutsu wrote:
Anybody knows, project qtd
(http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd/) is alive or died? Last
changes was one year ago. Tracking system contains critical
bugs and nobody fixes. There may be other working bindings for
Qt?
Hey, yes I
Anybody knows, project qtd (http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd/) is
alive or died? Last changes was one year ago. Tracking system contains
critical bugs and nobody fixes. There may be other working bindings for Qt?
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 22:32 +0200, ShestakoffVS wrote:
[…]
David, i read about LGPL and other nokia stupid ideas and now
want to know can i staticly link my programm with qtd.
LGPL is not a Nokia idea and not a stupid idea either. Using LGPL
libraries you can write proprietary code
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 23:04 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-08-16 22:32, ShestakoffVS wrote:
David, i read about LGPL and other nokia stupid ideas and now want to
know can i staticly link my programm with qtd.
As far as I know you need to link dynamically to Qt to avoid the LGPL
On 2012-08-17 09:55, Russel Winder wrote:
Can I suggest a re-phasing proprietary code needs to dynamically link
to Qt to comply with the LGPL. To avoid the LGPL with Qt you need to
buy a commercial Qt licence.
Applications that are themselves LGPL or GPL can dynamically or
statically link to
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 11:37 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
[…]
What I meant was to avoid being forced to license your code under LGPL.
It's not just for proprietary code, there are also other open source
licenses which are not compatible with GPL.
Indeed.
Sadly though, licences such as ASL
On 17/08/12 08:55, Russel Winder wrote:
Can I suggest a re-phasing proprietary code needs to dynamically link
to Qt to comply with the LGPL. To avoid the LGPL with Qt you need to
buy a commercial Qt licence.
I think this is over-stating the licence requirements. The legally safest
option is
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 13:06 +0100, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 17/08/12 08:55, Russel Winder wrote:
Can I suggest a re-phasing proprietary code needs to dynamically link
to Qt to comply with the LGPL. To avoid the LGPL with Qt you need to
buy a commercial Qt licence.
I think this
Could you explicitly explain me can i use QtD bindings for
commercial project?
On Thursday, 16 August 2012 at 16:35:19 UTC, ShestakoffVS wrote:
Could you explicitly explain me can i use QtD bindings for
commercial project?
I am not a lawyer, but: Yes, you can, under the restriction your
Qt license mandates. The QtD libraries itself are Boost-licensed,
it's just
On Thursday, 16 August 2012 at 18:24:51 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Thursday, 16 August 2012 at 16:35:19 UTC, ShestakoffVS wrote:
Could you explicitly explain me can i use QtD bindings for
commercial project?
I am not a lawyer, but: Yes, you can, under the restriction
your Qt license
On Thursday, 16 August 2012 at 19:07:20 UTC, ShestakoffVS wrote:
But i didn't understand how i can use qtd for commercial
project if i must use qt sources (that i cant use in commercial
project) when i'm building qtd.
You can use Qt under the LGPL:
http://qt.nokia.com/products/licensing
On Thursday, 16 August 2012 at 19:11:51 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Thursday, 16 August 2012 at 19:07:20 UTC, ShestakoffVS wrote:
But i didn't understand how i can use qtd for commercial
project if i must use qt sources (that i cant use in
commercial project) when i'm building qtd.
You
On 2012-08-16 22:32, ShestakoffVS wrote:
David, i read about LGPL and other nokia stupid ideas and now want to
know can i staticly link my programm with qtd.
As far as I know you need to link dynamically to Qt to avoid the LGPL
license.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 8/16/12, ShestakoffVS shestakof...@gmail.com wrote:
David, i read about LGPL and other nokia stupid ideas and now
want to know can i staticly link my programm with qtd.
Laws aren't stupid ideas. If you want to make a commercial app,
regardless of any libraries, you better have a lawyer.
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:15:14 +0200
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/16/12, ShestakoffVS shestakof...@gmail.com wrote:
David, i read about LGPL and other nokia stupid ideas and now
want to know can i staticly link my programm with qtd.
Laws aren't stupid ideas.
Just
On Apr 8, 2012 10:59 PM, vmars316 vmars...@live.com wrote:
Greetings,
I would also like to try out QTD.
So far, I have set things up this:
C:\D\dmd2\QT
I made a .batch file for both drcc.exe and duic.exe .
duic.exe gave no feedback.
drcc.exe gave the following feedback:
C:\D\dmd2\QT
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 12:52:47 UTC, Kevin Cox wrote:
I think rcc is the Qt resource compiler. I'm not at my
computer at the
moment to check, but if so it will translate xml resource files
into D
source.
I think rcc is the Qt resource compiler.
I don't know what the above means.
What
On Apr 9, 2012 12:09 PM, vmars316 vmars...@live.com wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 12:52:47 UTC, Kevin Cox wrote:
I think rcc is the Qt resource compiler. I'm not at my computer at the
moment to check, but if so it will translate xml resource files into D
source.
I think rcc is the Qt
Greetings,
I would also like to try out QTD.
So far, I have set things up this:
C:\D\dmd2\QT
I made a .batch file for both drcc.exe and duic.exe .
duic.exe gave no feedback.
drcc.exe gave the following feedback:
C:\D\dmd2\QT\binECHO ON
C:\D\dmd2\QT\bindrcc.exe
Qt resource compiler
Usage
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5554
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
/027fdbc892d7d2bd89e1d1b88accb53ca733f8de
Merge pull request #746 from yebblies/issue5554
Issue 5554 - [qtd] Covariance detection failure
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
/0c46d6921050907fe413244cbe71cfa7b93135a2
fix Issue 5554 - [qtd] Covariance detection failure
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5554
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On 7/20/11 12:37 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I had a bunch of runtime crashes when I last used QtD, and I've
reported this. But QtD seems to be staling again, there's hardly
anyone working on it. And how can anyone work on it when the porting
process is not documented..
Which kind
work on QtD for quite
some while now (it just works for my applications), but I'd be happy to
answer any questions (just drop by in #qtd, I am there quite frequently).
David
Yeah I know you're busy with that GSOC project, which is a pretty cool
project. Whatever happened to the rest of the QtD
Well now I can't even compile the example which used to crash at runtime:
http://codepad.org/Dh9fjQKG
This is while trying to compile the project in the attachment in this ticket:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd/ticket/85
Btw that's using 2.054 on XP32.
On 7/21/11 2:14 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Ok, but the other CTFE issues are still there:
D:\dev\projects\qtd\examples\desktop\systraydmd -unittest
-version=QtdUnittest -I..\..\..\build_dir\build -I..\..\..\d2
..\..\..\build_dir\build\lib\qtdcore.lib
..\..\..\build_dir\build\lib\qtdgui.lib
I'm trying to compile Qtd trunk on QT 4.7 using dmd 2.054, but I'm
getting a strange error:
-- Check for working CXX compiler: c:/Qt/2010.05/mingw/bin/g++.exe -- broken
The C++ compiler c:/Qt/2010.05/mingw/bin/g++.exe is not able to
compile a
simple test program.
But I'm able
On 19.07.2011 10:23, simendsjo wrote:
I'm trying to compile Qtd trunk on QT 4.7 using dmd 2.054, but I'm
getting a strange error:
-- Check for working CXX compiler: c:/Qt/2010.05/mingw/bin/g++.exe --
broken
The C++ compiler c:/Qt/2010.05/mingw/bin/g++.exe is not able to compile a
simple test
On 19.07.2011 11:20, simendsjo wrote:
On 19.07.2011 10:23, simendsjo wrote:
I'm trying to compile Qtd trunk on QT 4.7 using dmd 2.054, but I'm
getting a strange error:
-- Check for working CXX compiler: c:/Qt/2010.05/mingw/bin/g++.exe --
broken
The C++ compiler c:/Qt/2010.05/mingw/bin/g
On 19.07.2011 11:56, simendsjo wrote:
On 19.07.2011 11:20, simendsjo wrote:
On 19.07.2011 10:23, simendsjo wrote:
I'm trying to compile Qtd trunk on QT 4.7 using dmd 2.054, but I'm
getting a strange error:
-- Check for working CXX compiler: c:/Qt/2010.05/mingw/bin/g++.exe --
broken
The C
On 19.07.2011 12:45, simendsjo wrote:
On 19.07.2011 11:56, simendsjo wrote:
On 19.07.2011 11:20, simendsjo wrote:
On 19.07.2011 10:23, simendsjo wrote:
I'm trying to compile Qtd trunk on QT 4.7 using dmd 2.054, but I'm
getting a strange error:
-- Check for working CXX compiler: c:/Qt
On 19.07.2011 14:46, Trass3r wrote:
Giving up... Tried 3 versions of qt + 2 of cmake + 2 of qtd.
Is windows not supported anymore?
Was it ever?
I always hit that:
http://dsource.org/projects/qtd/ticket/54
I made it work (read: compile and crash on application start) on
Win7x86 a while ago
I had a bunch of runtime crashes when I last used QtD, and I've
reported this. But QtD seems to be staling again, there's hardly
anyone working on it. And how can anyone work on it when the porting
process is not documented..
I just tried to get QtD to run on windows 7 64 bit. (compiling QtD and
my app in 32 bit though) Unfortunatly it crashes the second I move my
mouse over a button. I'm using the first of the provided examples, and
even that crashes.
I searched the QtD forums and tickets, and this issue has been
Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de wrote in message
news:is554g$k8f$1...@digitalmars.com...
I just tried to get QtD to run on windows 7 64 bit. (compiling QtD and my
app in 32 bit though) Unfortunatly it crashes the second I move my mouse
over a button. I'm using the first of the provided
(This is visible), tr(But not this));
return app.exec();
}
Compiling with warnings shows a _lot_ of warnings from QtD...
C:\tempdmd -debug t.d qtdcore.lib qtdgui.lib
C:\tempt
object.Error: Access Violation
4F1C9C
4F1B13
46699A
46699A
49F9A4
4CF4E8
4CF527
4CF123
5283C5
52831C
I used the instructions here:
http://dsource.org/projects/qtd/wiki/BuildWindows
Could qtd depend on another qt sdk than the one linked from this
page?
A messagebox poppes up saying:
generator.exe - The procedure entry point
_Z17qt_message_output9QtMsgTypePKc could not be located in the
dynamic
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5622
Summary: [qtd] Static members imported with alias this are
inaccessible
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5554
Summary: [qtd] Covariance detection failure
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5234
Summary: [qtd] AA element assignment should use
copy-constructor to initialize new elements
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5234
--- Comment #1 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2010-11-18 08:37:19
PST ---
T.init should be QString.init in the example
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5223
Summary: [qtd] Cannot use default value with function parameter
of struct type
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5223
--- Comment #1 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2010-11-16 09:48:10
PST ---
Even simpler test-case:
struct S
{
this(int x)
{
}
void foo(S s = S(42))
{
}
}
void main()
{
S s;
s.foo(); // error
}
Error:
Max Samukha Wrote:
As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay tuned.
Perhaps someone could update the website to mention that the project is still
active?
http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd
on behalf of QtD.
Andrei
Thanks! I find it reasonable to lower our expectations of the
language/tools for a while. I've decided to go on without const and
other goodies like the scarcely implemented alias this.
For now, the most important for me are the issues with struct lifetime
management
and library bugs reported on behalf of QtD.
Andrei
Thanks! I find it reasonable to lower our expectations of the
language/tools for a while. I've decided to go on without const and
other goodies like the scarcely implemented alias this.
For now, the most important for me are the issues with struct
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:39:26 -0400, Jesse Phillips
jessekphillip...@gmail.com wrote:
This is indeed good news. I don't do enough with GUIs, but having
GUI library(s) will be a big requirement in D succeeding Good Luck.
Qt ia not only GUI - it also have network, database and data
structures
As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay tuned.
On 10/12/10 13:20 CDT, Max Samukha wrote:
As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay
tuned.
Awesome news! I think we need to take the hiccup as a warning to be more
mindful of compilers and library bugs reported on behalf of QtD.
Andrei
Max Samukha wrote:
As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay
tuned.
I'm drinking one on this, cheers!
Max Samukha Wrote:
As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay tuned.
This is indeed good news. I don't do enough with GUIs, but having GUI
library(s) will be a big requirement in D succeeding Good Luck.
Is anyone using QtD also on the beta mailing list? Don has
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:20:47 +0300, Max Samukha
spam...@d-coding.com wrote:
As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed.
Stay tuned.
Thanks! I'm not using QtD in my current project but it is 100% sure
that I'll want to use it in the future.
I would love to help but I
Max Samukha spam...@d-coding.com wrote:
As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay
tuned.
Yay! Good luck, and hope Walter and co will give your bug reports some
higher priority. I think that is the right thing to do now.
--
Simen
On 17/09/2010 17:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/17/10 10:48 CDT, Michel Fortin wrote:
In my mind it's simpler to just explain the notion that an uninitialized
hash is null and detached from anything else until initialized. Objects
works like this (minus the implicit initialization part),
On 09/27/2010 09:15 AM, Emil Madsen wrote:
Is there a partly complete release? - that just basic stuff available?
Latest trunk: http://bitbucket.org/qtd/repo
Wiki: http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd
I have a local branch that should fix a couple of major problems but it
is not ready
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
