Are you going to remove the D1 compiler parts of code in the D2
compiler source code? A leaner source base will help.
Also this transitional moment seems a good moment to rename the
.c suffix of the frontend+backend C++ files to .cpp or
something like that.
I have to warn people that if they
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 09:12:49 bearophile wrote:
I have to warn people that if they want to suddenly switch from
2.060 to 2.061 with no intermediate steps, probably some of their
code will break, and they will have to work to fix it.
Why?
- Jonathan M davis
Jonathan M Davis:
Why?
Because the two numbers 2.060 and 2.061 look very very
similar, so people that see them risk thinking they are just two
nearly identical releases of the same compiler. But many months
have passed between those two versions, many bugs have being
removed, several
Am 02.01.2013 08:48, schrieb evilrat:
arrays initialized with nulls right? anyway just setting only first
symbol in text field(it's wchar[4]) is enough.
Not wchar arrays:
import std.stdio;
void main() {
writefln(0x%x, wchar.init);
}
this prints: 0x
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:19:54 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
Why?
Because the two numbers 2.060 and 2.061 look very very
similar, so people that see them risk thinking they are just two
nearly identical releases of the same compiler. But many months
have passed between
Jonathan M Davis:
And how is that any different from any other release?
How much time used to pass between two adjacent releases, in past?
Bye,
bearophile
On 2013-01-02 00:46, Walter Bright wrote:
2. the OS X package hasn't been built yet (problems with the package
script).
What isn't working? Is there something I can do to help?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-01-02 12:55, bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
And how is that any different from any other release?
How much time used to pass between two adjacent releases, in past?
Bye,
bearophile
Around a month, perhaps.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-01-02 00:46, Walter Bright wrote:
2. the OS X package hasn't been built yet (problems with the package
script).
I think this will fix the problem:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/pull/9
I don't know if this is the problem you encountered but:
PackageMaker is
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 08:20:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 09:12:49 bearophile wrote:
I have to warn people that if they want to suddenly switch from
2.060 to 2.061 with no intermediate steps, probably some of
their
code will break, and they will have
Am Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:14:53 +0100
schrieb David Eagen davidea...@mailinator.com:
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 08:20:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 09:12:49 bearophile wrote:
I have to warn people that if they want to suddenly switch from
2.060 to 2.061
On 1/2/2013 4:12 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-02 00:46, Walter Bright wrote:
2. the OS X package hasn't been built yet (problems with the package
script).
What isn't working? Is there something I can do to help?
The various packages are all built on Ubuntu. The OS X one failed
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 17:53:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/2/2013 4:12 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-02 00:46, Walter Bright wrote:
2. the OS X package hasn't been built yet (problems with the
package
script).
What isn't working? Is there something I can do to help?
On 1/2/2013 7:27 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
That's unfortunately normal for every dmd release. We try to stay API
compatible, but ABI usually breaks with every compiler/druntime/phobos
update. This means you can't mix object/library files compiled with
different compiler versions.
I go to some
On 1/2/2013 9:59 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 17:53:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/2/2013 4:12 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-02 00:46, Walter Bright wrote:
2. the OS X package hasn't been built yet (problems with the package
script).
What isn't working?
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 09:53 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
The various packages are all built on Ubuntu. The OS X one failed because it
couldn't find ruby, and ruby does not work on Ubuntu (at least my version of
Ubuntu - there is no ruby package for it).
There has been a Ruby package on
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 10:07 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
Yeah, really. sudo apt-get ruby fails on Ubuntu 10.10.
Any and all apt-related commands are likely to fail for that version of
Ubuntu, it is no longer supported. Definitely need to stick with LTS
version of Ubuntu or keep up to date,
Hallo *.
Ich habe auf XING die D Programmiersprache Gruppe einrichten lassen.
Wer Interesse hat sich hier auszutauschen, Gleichgesinnte zu finden
und/oder Kontakte zu pflegen, ist herzlichst eingeladen.
Hier der Link: http://www.xing.com/net/dlang
Frohes neues Jahr an alle D'ler
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 18:19:01 UTC, notna wrote:
Hallo *.
Ich habe auf XING die D Programmiersprache Gruppe einrichten
lassen. Wer Interesse hat sich hier auszutauschen,
Gleichgesinnte zu finden und/oder Kontakte zu pflegen, ist
herzlichst eingeladen.
Hier der Link:
Al 02/01/13 19:07, En/na Walter Bright ha escrit:
Really? http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/ruby
Yeah, really. sudo apt-get ruby fails on Ubuntu 10.10.
$ sudo apt-get install ruby
--
Jordi Sayol
On 02.01.2013 19:24, Chris wrote:
A D-ating site? :-)
:D Hopefully on the way to something like that... then mainly for
business dating ;)
On 1/2/2013 10:37 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
Al 02/01/13 19:07, En/na Walter Bright ha escrit:
Really? http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/ruby
Yeah, really. sudo apt-get ruby fails on Ubuntu 10.10.
$ sudo apt-get install ruby
That's what I did try, and yes, it fails too.
On 1/2/2013 10:17 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 10:07 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
Yeah, really. sudo apt-get ruby fails on Ubuntu 10.10.
Any and all apt-related commands are likely to fail for that version of
Ubuntu, it is no longer supported. Definitely need to stick
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 10:47 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/2/2013 10:37 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
Al 02/01/13 19:07, En/na Walter Bright ha escrit:
Really? http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/ruby
Yeah, really. sudo apt-get ruby fails on Ubuntu 10.10.
$ sudo apt-get install ruby
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 10:51 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
I've been avoiding upgrading Ubuntu, because the last time I did that the
installer trashed everything. Lost a day on that one.
Just because it happened once doesn't mean it will always happen.
Until I abandoned all use of Ubuntu, I
Al 02/01/13 19:47, En/na Walter Bright ha escrit:
On 1/2/2013 10:37 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
Al 02/01/13 19:07, En/na Walter Bright ha escrit:
Really? http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/ruby
Yeah, really. sudo apt-get ruby fails on Ubuntu 10.10.
$ sudo apt-get install ruby
That's what I
On 1/2/2013 11:09 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 10:51 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
I've been avoiding upgrading Ubuntu, because the last time I did that the
installer trashed everything. Lost a day on that one.
Just because it happened once doesn't mean it will always
On 1/2/2013 11:09 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
I don't know why.
mercury ~ sudo apt-get install ruby
[sudo] password for walter:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
On 1/2/2013 11:05 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
To be expected in the circumstances since 10.10 is no longer supported.
Looks like I'll have to hold my nose and push the upgrade button, but after this
release is settled down.
Does the latest Ubuntu work properly with SSD drives? I know 10.10
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 03:20:27 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:19:54 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
Why?
Because the two numbers 2.060 and 2.061 look very very
similar, so people that see them risk thinking they are just two
nearly identical
Al 02/01/13 20:28, En/na Walter Bright ha escrit:
On 1/2/2013 11:09 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
I don't know why.
mercury ~ sudo apt-get install ruby
[sudo] password for walter:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages
Al 02/01/13 19:51, En/na Walter Bright ha escrit:
On 1/2/2013 10:17 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 10:07 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
Yeah, really. sudo apt-get ruby fails on Ubuntu 10.10.
Any and all apt-related commands are likely to fail for that version of
Ubuntu, it
1/2/2013 11:24 PM, Walter Bright пишет:
On 1/2/2013 11:09 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 10:51 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
I've been avoiding upgrading Ubuntu, because the last time I did that
the
installer trashed everything. Lost a day on that one.
Just because it
On 2013-01-02 20:09, Russel Winder wrote:
I have the opposite experience, Apple hardware seems incapable of
upgrading operating systems. Their policy seems to be you want a new
operating system, then buy a new piece of hardware from the store.
I've been updating a couple of Macs from 10.6
On 2013-01-02 19:51, Walter Bright wrote:
I've been avoiding upgrading Ubuntu, because the last time I did that
the installer trashed everything. Lost a day on that one.
That's what backups are for :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 1/2/2013 12:01 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
P.S. I like calendar programs, but on Windows and Ubuntu, upgrading the
OS inevitably deletes the calendar database. None of those frackin'
calendar programs ever deign to tell me where they store their frackin'
database, so I can back it up. I
On 2013-01-02 18:53, Walter Bright wrote:
The various packages are all built on Ubuntu. The OS X one failed
because it couldn't find ruby, and ruby does not work on Ubuntu (at
least my version of Ubuntu - there is no ruby package for it).
Looks like my mistake is I should have run it on OS X.
On 2013-01-02 21:37, Walter Bright wrote:
Windows has gotten better in this regard, that is true.
But it's still bizarre that, with Thunderbird, you can export/import the
address book, but not the mail database.
A welcome improvement would be to have a button to export/import the
whole
On 01/02/2013 03:37 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
But it's still bizarre that, with Thunderbird, you can export/import the
address book, but not the mail database.
Why would you need to? If your mail store is IMAP, just let it rebuild.
A welcome improvement would be to have a button to
On 1/2/2013 12:47 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-02 21:37, Walter Bright wrote:
Windows has gotten better in this regard, that is true.
But it's still bizarre that, with Thunderbird, you can export/import the
address book, but not the mail database.
A welcome improvement would be to
On 1/2/2013 12:56 PM, Matthew Caron wrote:
On 01/02/2013 03:37 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
But it's still bizarre that, with Thunderbird, you can export/import the
address book, but not the mail database.
Why would you need to? If your mail store is IMAP, just let it rebuild.
I don't store
On 1/2/2013 12:36 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-02 19:51, Walter Bright wrote:
I've been avoiding upgrading Ubuntu, because the last time I did that
the installer trashed everything. Lost a day on that one.
That's what backups are for :)
Having backups doesn't work so good when the
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 13:18:02 Walter Bright wrote:
What is the rationale behind import/export of address books, and not doing
that for anything else?
I don't know. kmail has basically the same problem. It drives me nuts that you
can't export accounts. It makes setting up a new
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 11:24 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
It does when you don't remember what goes in the host file, what you had
installed, redoing all the ssh keys, etc. It also deleted all my virtual
boxes,
I never did figure out how to get them working again. I simply gave up on
On 1/2/2013 1:29 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 13:18:02 Walter Bright wrote:
What is the rationale behind import/export of address books, and not doing
that for anything else?
I don't know. kmail has basically the same problem. It drives me nuts that you
can't
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 20:38:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Windows has gotten better in this regard, that is true.
But it's still bizarre that, with Thunderbird, you can
export/import the address book, but not the mail database.
A welcome improvement would be to have a button to
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 14:14:54 UTC, David Eagen wrote:
I have noticed my project doesn't compile with 2.061 when it
did with 2.060. I am using a few different static libraries,
one of them is thrift.
I had to recompile the libraries I use with 2.061 which meant I
had to rebuild
On 1/2/2013 1:32 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
It also nuked all my mail and calender data, which is why I don't use Ubuntu for
mail or calender anymore, nor do I use it for music (same thing happened).
Over-reaction to the wrong issue. Evolution is entirely fine for mail
and calendar, I use it all
All I can say is I've never looked back since abandoning
Canonical linuxes. And Debian in general, really. Hooray for
Gentoo.
More on-topic: I do look forward to playing around with UDA's and
seeing what kind of strange voodoo I can cook up with them. Been
anticipating this release for
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 23:58:08 Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
All I can say is I've never looked back since abandoning
Canonical linuxes. And Debian in general, really. Hooray for
Gentoo.
Glutton for punishment are we? I used to use it and got sick of stuff breaking
on me during
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 23:34:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I'd be shocked if he liked dealing with updates on Gentoo). I
use Arch these
days, since it provides a lot of the benefits of Gentoo without
anywhere near
as many of the headaches.
+1 for Arch.
Have used almost everything
On 1/2/2013 2:45 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 07:01:02 UTC, Bernard Helyer wrote:
I am getting a whole _mess_ of warning: statement not reachable
on everything after a final switch.
I can confirm this. Freaking annoying (and not really convincing me that D is
stable) !
On 1/2/2013 2:58 PM, Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
Been anticipating this release
for eons, it seems.
Me too. I'm glad to get it out the door, as my head is boiling over with things
I want to get done for the next version.
dimsuz wrote:
+1 for Arch.
Have used almost everything Gentoo, Ubuntu, Debian, OpenSuse
and ended up with Arch Linux. I am happy with it for almost two
years now and wouldn't even consider switching to something
else :)
Same here. After making my way through the most popular Linux
distros,
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 19:42:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 03:20:27 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:19:54 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
But many months
have passed between those two versions, many bugs have being
On 03.01.2013 08:40, Walter Bright wrote:
The most miserable of all is Microsoft Outlook Express, which stores all
the info in hidden directories that are down a long chain of paths
filled with directory names that are GUID identifiers.
Then, the mail files themselves are in some secret binary
On 1/2/2013 8:15 PM, Marco Nembrini wrote:
On 03.01.2013 08:40, Walter Bright wrote:
The most miserable of all is Microsoft Outlook Express, which stores all
the info in hidden directories that are down a long chain of paths
filled with directory names that are GUID identifiers.
Then, the
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 23:34:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 23:58:08 Chris Nicholson-Sauls
wrote:
All I can say is I've never looked back since abandoning
Canonical linuxes. And Debian in general, really. Hooray for
Gentoo.
Glutton for punishment are
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 13:18 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
I don't store email on the server, I store it locally.
I think that this is at the heart of your mail problems. It means you
rely on one and only one computer for email. I would find this
unworkable: I find IMAP the only solution that
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 18:34 -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[…]
But if I had to recommend an easy-to-use distro, I'd recommend OpenSuSE, but
as with all such things, YMMV. For better or worse, Ubuntu is very popular.
I remain with Debian Unstable as it works for me, but you do sometimes
have to
60 matches
Mail list logo
