On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 21:35:54 UTC, Seb wrote:
This is a great article, Mike!
Thanks!
At the end I expected a reference to D's great template
constraints [1], maybe it's still worth adding sth. like this
to show how amazingly useful CTFE is?
It's a good idea! I don't think I'll and ch
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 17:54:05 UTC, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
Very nice post!
Thanks! If it gets half as many page views as yours did, I'll be
happy. Yours is the most-viewed post on the blog -- over 1000
views more than #2 (my GC post), and 5,000 more than #3 (A New
Import Idiom).
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:23:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The crowd-edited (?) blog post exploring some of D's
compile-time features is now live. Thanks again to everyone who
helped out with it.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.co
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 18:25:19 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
IMO the problem here is the usage of a VERSION file in the
first place, which exists only b/c it's somewhat tricky to
invoke git on Windows.
Yup, my instinct is that if a VERSION file needs to exist at all
it should be created during
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:23:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The crowd-edited (?) blog post exploring some of D's
compile-time features is now live. Thanks again to everyone who
helped out with it.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.co
On 6/5/2017 10:54 AM, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:23:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The crowd-edited (?) blog post exploring some of D's compile-time features is
now live. Thanks again to everyone who helped out with it.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-ti
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 19:57:36 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
The problem here is that anyone downstream wanting to build or
package from source has to work around this issue, that without
manual intervention, the version information of the compiler
will be incorrect.
If that's not
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 18:08:40 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 21:04:00 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
This point release fixes a few issues over 2.074.0, see the
changelog for more details.
I'm afraid that the release has another fault: the VERSION file
still
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:23:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The crowd-edited (?) blog post exploring some of D's
compile-time features is now live. Thanks again to everyone who
helped out with it.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.co
The crowd-edited (?) blog post exploring some of D's compile-time
features is now live. Thanks again to everyone who helped out
with it.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/6fefdg/compiletime_sort_in_d/
Hi fellow Boston D enthusiasts. We are going to have another meetup at
the Street in Chestnut Hill this Friday. Andrei and I will be there,
hope you can join us! Please RSVP on the eventbrite page:
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/monthly-boston-d-get-together-tickets-35120523431
-Steve
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 14:17:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1003.md
The "See the previous version" link at the end of the document is
currently broken and leads to a 404.
Thank you for your efforts and congratulations to Jared Hanson!
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:06:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/3/2017 12:28 AM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
Personally, making contracts less verbose and more powerful is
much higher on my list
We did discuss bouncing the DIP back with a request to revamp
it as a complete overhaul of t
13 matches
Mail list logo
