On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:32:50 -0400, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk
wrote:
PS http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/announce/ appears
to stop in 2012-12
http://forum.dlang.org/group/digitalmars.D.announce
Don't use that other thing any more.
-Steve
On 2013-02-17, 10:52, Russel Winder wrote:
Why is this thread on the announce mailing list instead of the
discussion list?
Because it's more an announcement, and less a discussion about D?
--
Simen
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 17:31 +0100, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2013-02-17, 10:52, Russel Winder wrote:
Why is this thread on the announce mailing list instead of the
discussion list?
Because it's more an announcement, and less a discussion about D?
The original posting was clearly an
on for the last half month or so. It's a
new programming language which aims to be efficient, have
similar syntax to Ruby, and where you never have to specify
types of variables and arguments.
https://github.com/manastech/crystal/wiki/Introduction
I'd also like to ask you:
1. Do you know whether a similar
On Sunday, 17 February 2013 at 06:28:09 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
One time I asked in this newsgroup if it was possible to have
an auto keyword for function/method arguments. And... why not
make all functions/methods be templates on the type of its
arguments?
I think nobody liked this
On Thursday, 28 February 2013 at 08:22:45 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Sunday, 17 February 2013 at 06:28:09 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
One time I asked in this newsgroup if it was possible to have
an auto keyword for function/method arguments. And... why
not make all functions/methods be
On Wednesday, 27 February 2013 at 03:48:53 UTC, Jordan Miner
wrote:
It does make me wish that LLVM supported exceptions on
Windows...
It does support DW2-style exceptions on 32 bit MinGW now and
there are preliminary patches for 64 bit SEH, even if 32 bit SEH
is still unsupported.
on for the last half month or so. It's a
new programming language which aims to be efficient, have
similar syntax to Ruby, and where you never have to specify
types of variables and arguments.
https://github.com/manastech/crystal/wiki/Introduction
I'd also like to ask you:
1. Do you know whether a similar
On 2/25/2013 6:50 AM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 2/19/13 6:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/16/2013 10:28 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
https://github.com/manastech/crystal/wiki/Introduction
Just a thought - the Introduction needs an introductory (!) paragraph at
the beginning explaining what
On 2/19/13 6:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/16/2013 10:28 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
https://github.com/manastech/crystal/wiki/Introduction
Just a thought - the Introduction needs an introductory (!) paragraph at
the beginning explaining what Crystal is, what its point is, and where
it fits
On Sunday, 17 February 2013 at 06:28:09 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
I'd also like to ask you:
1. Do you know whether a similar language exists?
Not sure how similar all the goals are (dynamic with static
benefits) but there is Magpie: http://magpie.stuffwithstuff.com/
On 2013-02-21 21:37, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Not sure how similar all the goals are (dynamic with static benefits)
but there is Magpie: http://magpie.stuffwithstuff.com/
Doesn't that run on the JVM?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 21 February 2013 at 21:59:06 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
Doesn't that run on the JVM?
I couldn't find what it generates to. It has an interpreter in
Java and C++ though.
Ok, that sounds really stupid. I thought it had a compiled
component, but I don't see that, just looks to be
Jesse Phillips:
Ok, that sounds really stupid. I thought it had a compiled
component, but I don't see that, just looks to be interpreted.
Magpie designer (Bob Nystrom) is a quite smart person :-) Here he
explains two main kinds of iterations:
On 2013-02-17 07:28, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
The goal of this programming language it so be as efficient as possible,
but probably it won't be as efficient as C in the general case. But...
who knows?
Do you know abou julia ?
http://julialang.org/
/
Yes :-)
Before we started developing Crystal we searched for similar languages,
found Julia and it really amazed us.
It's similar in some aspects, like the use of LLVM, multiple-dispatch
and the idea that implementing everything in the same language leads for
more optimizable and inlineable code
On 2/16/2013 10:28 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
https://github.com/manastech/crystal/wiki/Introduction
Just a thought - the Introduction needs an introductory (!) paragraph at the
beginning explaining what Crystal is, what its point is, and where it fits into
the universe of programming
On 2/17/13 5:46 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-02-17 21:22, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Since it's not yet implemented, it could be like that, or it can be that
it is evaluated when you execute the program (but not at compile time).
But if I just but code that the top level of a file, when at
On 2013-02-18 13:46, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
In the order it was analyzed. Same as in Ruby.
I see.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
as insane.
...
Thanks for your comments,
Ary
P.S.: bin/crystal -e 'a = 0; 10.times { |i| a += i }; puts a' -O3 -ll
Sorry for such cruel comment, I it is just my opinion.
--
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij
Ary Borenszweig:
I started thinking about this idea: a compiled language that
looked like a dynamic language. Is it possible?
Of course it's possible, I given my help in the development of
ShedSkin:
http://code.google.com/p/shedskin/
Its compilation times are significant and they keep
Why is this thread on the announce mailing list instead of the
discussion list?
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp:
On 2013-02-17 08:46, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Have you looked into Ruby Motion or Mirah as well?
Or MacRuby. It's free (as in free beer) and open source, not something
that Ruby Motion is.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Am 17.02.2013 12:57, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2013-02-17 08:46, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Have you looked into Ruby Motion or Mirah as well?
Or MacRuby. It's free (as in free beer) and open source, not something
that Ruby Motion is.
My problem with MacRuby and Ruby Motion is they are tied to
On 2013-02-17 14:21, Paulo Pinto wrote:
My problem with MacRuby and Ruby Motion is they are tied to Mac OS X.
Yeah, I agree. But developing for iOS is pretty tied to Mac OS X anyway.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2/17/13 6:29 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
I'd like to specify function attributes explicitly because I do want to
get a compilation error when I e.g. use non-safe stuff in safe function
instead of a just compiler silently changing the function (and all
functions which use it) to unsafe.=
On 2/17/13 9:14 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I find it very interesting. But actually I'm going to agree with Denis,
mostly. If I was going to use Crystal I would probably use a lot more
static typing than it's probably made for.
I quite often miss static typing in Ruby. Often there are functions
Have you looked into Ruby Motion or Mirah as well?
Ruby Motion is not open source, so we couldn't (or didn't want) to take
a look at that.
Mirah compiles for the JVM, and we want to compile to native code. We
try to escape from virtual machines...
Am 17.02.2013 17:41, schrieb Ary Borenszweig:
Have you looked into Ruby Motion or Mirah as well?
Ruby Motion is not open source, so we couldn't (or didn't want) to take
a look at that.
I know, the question was more in the value proposal kind of way.
Mirah compiles for the JVM, and we want
for example in the Comparable module:
https://github.com/manastech/crystal/blob/master/std/comparable.cr
So in that case self would evaluate, at compile time, to whatever
Comparable is mixed in to?
I thought it was supported but it's not. It would be very easy to
support it, but it would execute
On Sunday, 17 February 2013 at 12:14:40 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Except from what others already have mentioned someone created
a language with a Python like syntax written in D. But I think
that had explicit types.
http://delight.sourceforge.net/
for the
owner of the method. This is used for example in the Comparable module:
https://github.com/manastech/crystal/blob/master/std/comparable.cr
So in that case self would evaluate, at compile time, to whatever
Comparable is mixed in to?
Yes.
I thought it was supported but it's not. It would
On 2013-02-17 21:22, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Since it's not yet implemented, it could be like that, or it can be that
it is evaluated when you execute the program (but not at compile time).
But if I just but code that the top level of a file, when at runtime is
that executed?
--
/Jacob
On 2013-02-17 20:50, JN wrote:
http://delight.sourceforge.net/
There we go, thanks.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
to be efficient, have similar syntax to Ruby, and
where you never have to specify types of variables and arguments.
https://github.com/manastech/crystal/wiki/Introduction
I'd also like to ask you:
1. Do you know whether a similar language exists?
2. Do you think it's feasible? Right now we are getting
language which aims to be efficient, have similar syntax to Ruby, and
where you never have to specify types of variables and arguments.
https://github.com/manastech/crystal/wiki/Introduction
I'd also like to ask you:
1. Do you know whether a similar language exists?
2. Do you think it's feasible
36 matches
Mail list logo
