Robert Jacques Wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:40:51 -0400, Robert Jacques
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:45:44 -0400, Robert Jacques
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for yet another great release, but.. has anyone else gotten DFL
> >> to compile? (The latest svn of DFL worked fine in 2.
Walter Bright wrote:
Robert Clipsham wrote:
You can tell it's a good release when you have to do more than a
simple merge to get it working with ldc ;)
I try to simplify things in the back end by moving more to the front end.
Sounds like a good philosophy to me.
All it does is return a comp
Walter Bright wrote:
Robert Clipsham wrote:
Unlikely, sorry. LDC 2 is in a very early alpha state. Currently a
custom version of druntime compiles (a patch has been submitted), how
much of it functions correctly remains to be seen. Anything using the
GC doesn't work as some of the GC code segf
Robert Clipsham wrote:
Unlikely, sorry. LDC 2 is in a very early alpha state. Currently a
custom version of druntime compiles (a patch has been submitted), how
much of it functions correctly remains to be seen. Anything using the GC
doesn't work as some of the GC code segfaults, and about 90% o
Robert Clipsham wrote:
You can tell it's a good release when you have to do more than a simple
merge to get it working with ldc ;)
I try to simplify things in the back end by moving more to the front end.
I've pretty much finished merging dmd 2.032 into ldc, there's one issue
remaining though
Robert Clipsham wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
This will probably be the last OSX 10.5 release, the next should be 10.6.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.047.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.032.z
Jason House wrote:
Robert Clipsham Wrote:
You can tell it's a good release when you have to do more than a simple
merge to get it working with ldc ;)
I've pretty much finished merging dmd 2.032 into ldc, ...
Does this mean an official D2 LDC will be coming out shortly?
Unlikely, sorry. L
Robert Clipsham Wrote:
> You can tell it's a good release when you have to do more than a simple
> merge to get it working with ldc ;)
>
> I've pretty much finished merging dmd 2.032 into ldc, ...
Does this mean an official D2 LDC will be coming out shortly?
Walter Bright wrote:
This will probably be the last OSX 10.5 release, the next should be 10.6.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.047.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.032.zip
Many thanks to the n
Don wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Don wrote:
Oh. And the D1 spec doesn't disallow inline asm in CTFE.
But CTFE asm is Not Going To Happen.
I think that eventually we can get all of SafeD to work in CTFE, but
inline asm isn't part of SafeD!
SafeD doesn't appear to be properly defined in the
Walter Bright wrote:
Don wrote:
Oh. And the D1 spec doesn't disallow inline asm in CTFE.
But CTFE asm is Not Going To Happen.
I think that eventually we can get all of SafeD to work in CTFE, but
inline asm isn't part of SafeD!
SafeD doesn't appear to be properly defined in the spec. And ce
Its great to see so many bugs being sorted out.
However, I am having all kinds of trouble with "shared", which up until
now I have been able to fairly easily sidestep. Here is a cut-down
example of what I am trying to do, which is to have one thread acquiring
data and passing it on to another t
Anders Bergh wrote:
Why the last for OS X 10.5? You can compile software for 10.5 on 10.6
just like you would compile for 10.4 on 10.5. Are you planning on
using some Snow Leopard-only features?
Apple apparently changed how the linker works. The 10.5 linker does not
work as documented, and it
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:16, Walter Bright wrote:
> This will probably be the last OSX 10.5 release, the next should be 10.6.
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.047.zip
>
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmar
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:40:51 -0400, Robert Jacques
wrote:
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:45:44 -0400, Robert Jacques
wrote:
Thanks for yet another great release, but.. has anyone else gotten DFL
to compile? (The latest svn of DFL worked fine in 2.031)
I've been trying to get it up and running
Don:
> >> but there's absolutely no reason why 'new' expressions should be
> >> disallowed.<
> I mean things like:
> int [] a = new int[n];
> which is trivial -- about 5 lines of code.
I hope to see such trivial thing in future DMDs :-)
So it may simplify the code I've shown here:
http://www.di
Don wrote:
Oh. And the D1 spec doesn't disallow inline asm in CTFE.
But CTFE asm is Not Going To Happen.
I think that eventually we can get all of SafeD to work in CTFE, but
inline asm isn't part of SafeD!
bearophile wrote:
Don:
CTFE is almost completely isolated from the rest of the compiler: it can't break
anything that's not CTFE.<
It's like having a compiler plus a D1 interpreter. In theory this duplication
looks silly, in practice it seems handy.
Interestingly, by *requiring* the comp
Don:
>CTFE is almost completely isolated from the rest of the compiler: it can't
>break anything that's not CTFE.<
It's like having a compiler plus a D1 interpreter. In theory this duplication
looks silly, in practice it seems handy.
>It is likely, for example, that unions will need to be di
On 9/4/09 01:45, Robert Jacques wrote:
Thanks for yet another great release, but.. has anyone else gotten DFL
to compile? (The latest svn of DFL worked fine in 2.031)
I've been trying to get it up and running but I've been seeing really
weird errors. It appears in several cases that various impo
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:45:44 -0400, Robert Jacques
wrote:
Thanks for yet another great release, but.. has anyone else gotten DFL
to compile? (The latest svn of DFL worked fine in 2.031)
I've been trying to get it up and running but I've been seeing really
weird errors. It appears in seve
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Don, el 3 de septiembre a las 17:30 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 3 de septiembre a las 01:16 me escribiste:
This will probably be the last OSX 10.5 release, the next should be 10.6.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Nick B wrote:
Don wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 3 de septiembre a las 01:16 me escribiste:
Don't get me wrong, as I stated before, I'm really glad D1 get some new
features/improvements, I just think the changes sho
Thanks for yet another great release, but.. has anyone else gotten DFL to
compile? (The latest svn of DFL worked fine in 2.031)
I've been trying to get it up and running but I've been seeing really
weird errors. It appears in several cases that various import statements
are not being import
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Nick B wrote:
> Don wrote:
>>
>> Leandro Lucarella wrote:
>>>
>>> Walter Bright, el 3 de septiembre a las 01:16 me escribiste:
>>
>>> Don't get me wrong, as I stated before, I'm really glad D1 get some new
>>> features/improvements, I just think the changes should b
Don wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 3 de septiembre a las 01:16 me escribiste:
Don't get me wrong, as I stated before, I'm really glad D1 get some new
features/improvements, I just think the changes should be a little more
tested before hit D1 (and new aditions to D1 should
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter, could you please update changelog.dd from svn and then update
the html changelog?
done.
I counted 102 fixed bugs in this release.
Andrei
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter,
could you please update changelog.dd from svn and then update the html
changelog?
done.
Don wrote:
A few bugs are fixed but not listed in the changelog:
3077 crash exiting main() without result code
3100 ICE(cast.c) struct with members is shared
3253 DMD crashes on function pointer struct member initialization with
function literal
3281 ICE(cod1.c) append returned struct to array
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> This will probably be the last OSX 10.5 release, the next should be 10.6.
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.047.zip
>
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalm
Don, el 3 de septiembre a las 17:30 me escribiste:
> Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> >Walter Bright, el 3 de septiembre a las 01:16 me escribiste:
> >>This will probably be the last OSX 10.5 release, the next should be 10.6.
> >>
> >>http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> >>http://ftp.digit
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 3 de septiembre a las 01:16 me escribiste:
This will probably be the last OSX 10.5 release, the next should be 10.6.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.047.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.
Walter Bright, el 3 de septiembre a las 01:16 me escribiste:
> This will probably be the last OSX 10.5 release, the next should be 10.6.
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.047.zip
>
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> http://
Walter Bright wrote:
This will probably be the last OSX 10.5 release, the next should be 10.6.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.047.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.032.zip
Many thanks to the n
Indeed, using CTFE will probably feel different after this release of D1/D2.
Good work.
I'd like to improve this Wikipedia page some more:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compile_time_function_execution
So after all such bugfixes are there better ways to implement the following
code (better = simp
Walter Bright wrote:
This will probably be the last OSX 10.5 release, the next should be 10.6.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.047.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.032.zip
Many thanks to the n
Walter Bright wrote:
This will probably be the last OSX 10.5 release, the next should be 10.6.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.047.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.032.zip
Many thanks to the n
M-M-M-MONSTER KILL!
The serious bug splatting action continues.
Thank you Walter and contributors.
This will probably be the last OSX 10.5 release, the next should be 10.6.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.047.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.032.zip
Many thanks to the numerous people who con
39 matches
Mail list logo
