Timon Gehr:
Usually bugs are reported by the guy who finds them, but here
you go:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8400
Thank you, already fixed, it seems. Even if the fix is the
opposite of what I have thought (I was thinking about forbidding
global immutables too to be used a
Marco:
>>> auto distance = 100.km;
>>> auto speed = 120.km/hour;
>> Sounds fun. I mean, it makes me happy to see code written like this
instead of
>> Distance distance = new Kilometers(100);
>> Speed speed = Speed.fromDistanceByTime(new Kilometers(120), new
Hours(1));
Yeah, that was exactly one
Hello everyone,
I encountered a few more problems while creating my system-wide
makro program.
1)
I can't load my dll with LoadLibraryW, only LoadLibraryA. Why?
2)
The LoadLibraryA function "fails" with Error Code 127 - I still
get a Handle and can register my function as a
LowLevelKeyboard
New question:
I have this code:
[code]
import std.stdio;
struct Test {
public:
this(int i = 0) {
writeln("CTOR");
}
this(this) {
writeln("COPY CTOR");
}
~this() {
writeln("DTOR");
}
}
void main() {
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:07:51 +0100, DLimited
wrote:
Hello everyone,
I encountered a few more problems while creating my system-wide makro
program.
1)
I can't load my dll with LoadLibraryW, only LoadLibraryA. Why?
How are you passing the DLL filename to LoadLibraryA/W? Are you passing
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:50:19 +0100, Namespace
wrote:
New question:
I have this code:
[code]
import std.stdio;
struct Test {
public:
this(int i = 0) {
writeln("CTOR");
}
this(this) {
writeln("COPY CTOR");
}
~this() {
For correctness:
A copy call is still fine if I assign a local variable to _arr
(even if i think that ref parameters should'nt be copied), but i
think that it is not fine if I assign directly, as you see above.
Does:
_arr[0] = Test(0);
avoid the copy construction?
R
[code]
void main() {
Test[2] _arr = void;
_arr[0] = Test(0);
writeln("end main");
}
[/code]
puts
CTOR
DTOR
end main
DTOR
DTOR
If i wrote Test[] instead of Test[2] i get an exception.
There is no dynamic way f
On Friday, July 20, 2012 15:50:19 Namespace wrote:
> Why on earth?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6884996/questions-about-postblit-and-move-
semantics
If you want to guarantee that you don't get any copies while moving an object
around, it needs to be a reference type (which would includ
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 13:50:20 UTC, Namespace wrote:
New question:
I have this code:
[code]
import std.stdio;
struct Test {
public:
this(int i = 0) {
writeln("CTOR");
}
Be careful about "int i = O". Structs are not allowed to have
default constructors. Th
On Friday, July 20, 2012 08:08:47 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Friday, July 20, 2012 15:50:19 Namespace wrote:
> > Why on earth?
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6884996/questions-about-postblit-and-move
> - semantics
>
> If you want to guarantee that you don't get any copies while movi
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 12:28:52 UTC, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
Hmm, looking at it, I guess kilo is just
1000 as an enum in your code? That's a good idea.
Sorry, that should have been »kilo!gram«. It actually creates a
new unit with a conversion factor of 1000 relative to the base
unit (well,
If i @disable the postblit i get a strange behaviour:
[code]
struct Test {
public:
int _id;
this(int i) {
_id = i;
writeln("CTOR");
}
@disable
this(this);
~this() {
writeln("DTOR");
}
}
vo
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 16:02:18 UTC, Namespace wrote:
If i @disable the postblit i get a strange behaviour:
@disable
this(this);
I think @disable is broken right now, and does nothing (ei:
allows a default implementation of this(this) ).
If you replace by the C++ "declar
It seems structs are very broken right now...
I would use classes, but they are nullable and without
correct/good error handling instead of "access violation" i
prefer structs.
Funny, all variables are default initialized which would be even
done by the OS. But Null Exceptions aren't exists and
On 07/20/2012 09:02 AM, Namespace wrote:
> If i @disable the postblit i get a strange behaviour:
Something is not right. Compiled with dmd 2.059, the linker says:
undefined reference to `_D6deneme4Test10__postblitMFZv'
64 bit Linux...
Ali
Hello all,
Often when writing simulations with pseudo-random number generation you want to
be able to use a predictable seed for testing purposes, e.g. to confirm whether
an alteration to the code produces changes in output.
In a single-threaded piece of code this is easy -- one can just put
On Friday, July 20, 2012 19:52:17 Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On a related note, is it possible to override the default random number
> generator with another type?
As long as rndGen isn't called with its full path (std.random.rndGen), any
module which uses it could declare its own rndGen, a
Trying to convert the below code to D, for the life of me I
cannot do it :( I'm guess I need to use a template for this
but I just cannot get my head around it. Any help please?
#ifdef SFML_DEBUG
// If in debug mode, perform a test on every call
#define alCheck(Func) ((Func), priv::alC
Something else which is against classes: incorrect scope
behaviour:
[code]
import std.stdio;
class TestC {
public:
this() {
writeln("CTOR class");
}
~this() {
writeln("DTOR class");
}
}
struct TestS {
public:
this(int i) {
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 21:36:59 UTC, Damian wrote:
Trying to convert the below code to D, for the life of me I
cannot do it :( I'm guess I need to use a template for this
but I just cannot get my head around it. Any help please?
#ifdef SFML_DEBUG
// If in debug mode, perform a test on
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 21:41:45 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Why comes "DTOR class" _after_ "end main" and not before?
If i write "scope TestC c = ...;" it is correct, but i read that
"scope" will be deprecated. Can someone explain me that
behaviour?
The destructor will be invoked when the GC col
On 07/20/2012 01:53 PM, bearophile wrote:
Timon Gehr:
Usually bugs are reported by the guy who finds them, but here you go:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8400
Thank you, already fixed, it seems. Even if the fix is the opposite of
what I have thought (I was thinking about forbi
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 21:51:02 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 21:41:45 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Why comes "DTOR class" _after_ "end main" and not before?
If i write "scope TestC c = ...;" it is correct, but i read
that
"scope" will be deprecated. Can someone explain me
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 21:47:55 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 21:36:59 UTC, Damian wrote:
Trying to convert the below code to D, for the life of me I
cannot do it :( I'm guess I need to use a template for this
but I just cannot get my head around it. Any help please?
#ifd
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 21:41:45 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Something else which is against classes: incorrect scope
behaviour:
[code]
import std.stdio;
class TestC {
public:
this() {
writeln("CTOR class");
}
~this() {
writeln("DTOR class")
On 07/20/2012 02:54 PM, Namespace wrote:
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 21:51:02 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 21:41:45 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Why comes "DTOR class" _after_ "end main" and not before?
If i write "scope TestC c = ...;" it is correct, but i read that
"scope" w
That happens because the destructor is being called when Garbage
collector is cleaning the memory used by the class instance.
How can i call the DTOR or at least a Release method after end of
scope?
Optimally automatic without any explicit calls.
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 21:54:05 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 21:51:02 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 21:41:45 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Why comes "DTOR class" _after_ "end main" and not before?
If i write "scope TestC c = ...;" it is correct, but i re
On 20/07/12 19:59, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
As long as rndGen isn't called with its full path (std.random.rndGen), any
module which uses it could declare its own rndGen, and it would be used
instead of std.random's, in which case you could do whatever you want with its
type or seed.
I did consid
On 07/19/2012 06:09 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 07/19/2012 02:51 AM, Artur Skawina wrote:
Range!Node opSlice() { return Range!Node(first); }
Range!(const Node) opSlice() const { return Range!(const
Node)(first); }
it looks like you could almost merge these two into one using
On Friday, July 20, 2012 23:36:58 Damian wrote:
> Trying to convert the below code to D, for the life of me I
> cannot do it :( I'm guess I need to use a template for this
> but I just cannot get my head around it. Any help please?
>
> #ifdef SFML_DEBUG
>
> // If in debug mode, perform a test on
On Friday, July 20, 2012 17:15:53 Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> On 07/19/2012 06:09 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> > On 07/19/2012 02:51 AM, Artur Skawina wrote:
> >> Range!Node opSlice() { return Range!Node(first); }
> >> Range!(const Node) opSlice() const { return Range!(const
> >>
> >> Node)(first); }
Hello,
I have a question about the semantic of parameter
specialization(TemplateTypeParameterSpecialization)
In this following code, there are 2 forms of the same function
'add' :
T add(T, U : T) (T a, U b) //doesn't work
{
return a + b;
}
T add(T, U) (T a, U b) if(is(U : T)) //works
On Saturday, July 21, 2012 00:04:21 Namespace wrote:
> > That happens because the destructor is being called when Garbage
> > collector is cleaning the memory used by the class instance.
>
> How can i call the DTOR or at least a Release method after end of
> scope?
> Optimally automatic without an
On 07/20/2012 06:47 PM, Eyyub wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about the semantic of parameter
specialization(TemplateTypeParameterSpecialization)
In this following code, there are 2 forms of the same function 'add' :
T add(T, U : T) (T a, U b) //doesn't work
{
return a + b;
}
T add(T, U) (T a
> Sorry, that should have been »kilo!gram«. It actually creates a new unit
> with tbua conversion factor of 1000 relative to the base unit (well, it does a
> few more things to handle cases like kilo!(milli!meter)), with the point
> being that the quantities are actually stored in memory "verbatim"
37 matches
Mail list logo
