On 10/21/2013 07:27 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 22:23:16 UTC, John Joyus wrote:
1. When I click the OK button, the message dialog pops-up *after* the
main window is closed, though the window.close(); line is after the
call to the MessageBox..
that's because the Messa
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:29:54 UTC, develop32 wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:08:15 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Saturday, 19 October 2013 at 13:20:28 UTC, develop32 wrote:
Hi,
Are there any recent improvements in how D interfaces with
C++? I got the impression that some work has been d
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 20:14:09 UTC, ixid wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 19:37:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, October 21, 2013 21:16:00 qznc wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 16:22:29 UTC, Krzysztof Ciebiera
wrote:
> I understand slices now and I don't find it consi
On Tuesday, 22 October 2013 at 01:07:48 UTC, Erik van Velzen
wrote:
I do get a few compiler errors with DMD in these win32.* modules
about incorrect typecasts. I will make a new topic if these
persist or file a bug report with the author.
if you use x64 build then i must disappoint you, it only
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 04:38:05 UTC, evilrat wrote:
i'm currently trying to get up
DirectX(d3d10(x),d3d11(x),xaudio2,x3daudio,d3dmath) up and
running in free time, but i constantly encounter serious
problems on my way. now i have some weird problems with COM(no
COM - no DirectX).
so
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 22:23:16 UTC, John Joyus wrote:
1. When I click the OK button, the message dialog pops-up
*after* the main window is closed, though the window.close();
line is after the call to the MessageBox..
that's because the MessageBox class here is implemented as
another w
On Monday, October 21, 2013 22:14:08 ixid wrote:
> What would be the issue/s with disallowing appending to slices?
> So you'd have to explicitly duplicate before you could append.
All arrays are slices. There is no difference between the two. It's just that
if you start appending to one, it will
On 10/21/2013 03:29 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
oops, it was not supposed to have a scroll bar at all. Fixed, it was a
one line change, line 1823, remove the HSCROLL members.
New version is on github too.
That works!
I've had some trouble with WinXP and background colors on checkboxes and
radio
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 20:20:45 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Why on earth not?
By spec / definition. Alias is intended to only work on symbols
(that is the very definition of alias). Unfortunately, template
alias parameter has also extra special cases for now good reason
which adds confusi
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 19:14:25 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 18:42:27 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 12:58:55 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I suspect I'm being very dumb here, but I can't get my head
around this:
template B(alias A)
{
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 19:37:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, October 21, 2013 21:16:00 qznc wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 16:22:29 UTC, Krzysztof Ciebiera
wrote:
> I understand slices now and I don't find it consistent with
> "no
> shoot in the foot by default" statem
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 19:33:07 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
I've used quite some T(A...), so I was used to literals not
being
aliasable.
A bit strange that literals "is symbols" (or how I should phrase
it) when using T(alias A), but not T(A...).
Literals are never symbols. It is a special cas
On Monday, October 21, 2013 21:16:00 qznc wrote:
> On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 16:22:29 UTC, Krzysztof Ciebiera
>
> wrote:
> > I understand slices now and I don't find it consistent with "no
> > shoot in the foot by default" statement.
>
> I agree. The pitfalls are well understood, yet everybod
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 16:51:02 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 15:00:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 12:58:55 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I suspect I'm being very dumb here, but I can't get my head
around this:
template B(alias A)
{
ali
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 16:51:02 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 15:00:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 12:58:55 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I suspect I'm being very dumb here, but I can't get my head
around this:
template B(alias A)
{
ali
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 16:22:29 UTC, Krzysztof Ciebiera
wrote:
What I want to do is: I want to take a look at every single
solution and extend it if it is possible (eg. if solution
contains obbects a,b,c it can also contain d).
void main()
{
import std.stdio;
int[][] dat
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 19:01:11 UTC, John Joyus wrote:
When I run the executable, the edit control shows no usable
height. It reduced to 0.5 mm, and width goes beyond the window,
leaving a scroll bar.
oops, it was not supposed to have a scroll bar at all. Fixed, it
was a one line chang
Please check the specification I have linked ;) It is a weird
design but implementation currently conforms to it.
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 16:22:29 UTC, Krzysztof Ciebiera
wrote:
I understand slices now and I don't find it consistent with "no
shoot in the foot by default" statement.
I agree. The pitfalls are well understood, yet everybody seems to
love them. Ok, compared to C array they are an improv
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 18:42:27 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 12:58:55 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I suspect I'm being very dumb here, but I can't get my head
around this:
template B(alias A)
{
alias B = A;
}
template C(A ...)
{
alias C
The full example now compiles with those two new files, thanks.
When I run the executable, the edit control shows no usable height. It
reduced to 0.5 mm, and width goes beyond the window, leaving a scroll bar.
Trying to set its Height and Width in the example program had no effect.
Btw, I hav
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 12:58:55 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I suspect I'm being very dumb here, but I can't get my head
around this:
template B(alias A)
{
alias B = A;
}
template C(A ...)
{
alias C = A[0];
}
static assert(B!1 == 1); //fine
stat
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 12:58:55 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I suspect I'm being very dumb here, but I can't get my head
around this:
template B(alias A)
{
alias B = A;
}
template C(A ...)
{
alias C = A[0];
}
static assert(B!1 == 1); //fine
stat
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 16:51:02 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
I didn't know the B template would work... Is this correct
semantics according to the spec?
http://dlang.org/template.html#TemplateAliasParameter
"Literals can also be used as arguments to alias parameters."
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 15:00:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 12:58:55 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I suspect I'm being very dumb here, but I can't get my head
around this:
template B(alias A)
{
alias B = A;
}
template C(A ...)
{
alias C = A
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 14:59:54 UTC, Alexandr Druzhinin
wrote:
If you switch instruction order you create local copy and then
set x[0] in local copy so original is unchanged. But local copy
creating depends on several thing and happens not every
appending in general. Your way is not D-is
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 05:14:50 UTC, John Joyus wrote:
Btw, I had to comment out the lines that contain TextLabel and
the .content in the example code as it fails to compile with
following errors:
I just added that class yesterday and probably forgot to push to
github
grab new versio
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 12:58:55 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I suspect I'm being very dumb here, but I can't get my head
around this:
template B(alias A)
{
alias B = A;
}
template C(A ...)
{
alias C = A[0];
}
static assert(B!1 == 1); //fine
stat
21.10.2013 17:55, Krzysztof Ciebiera пишет:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 10:41:38 UTC, Alexandr Druzhinin wrote:
21.10.2013 17:31, Krzysztof Ciebiera пишет:
void main()
{
int a[][] = [[1,2,3]];
foreach(x; a)
{
x[0] = 0;
x ~= 4;
}
writeln(a);
}
...
&) or [0,2
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 07:31:30 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 10/20/2013 10:59 PM, Agustin wrote:
> That didn't work, but after reading how emplace works, i had
to make
> some changes.
>
> public T allocate(T : Object, A...)(auto ref A
arguments) {
> auto pMemory =
rawAllocate(
I suspect I'm being very dumb here, but I can't get my head
around this:
template B(alias A)
{
alias B = A;
}
template C(A ...)
{
alias C = A[0];
}
static assert(B!1 == 1); //fine
static assert(C!1 == 1); //Error: cannot alias an expression 1
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:48:11 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Using destroy will zero the entire memory block after
destroying the object. If you are freeing the memory right
after destroying this is going to cost you performance.
To avoid this declare:
extern (C) void rt_finalize2(void*
Am 21.10.2013 04:17, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 02:06:02 UTC, Agustin wrote:
I'm implementing some custom memory allocator, is possible to call an
object destructor directly?
destroy(object);
destroy is in the automatically imported object.dm so you don't have to
im
Agustin:
The code is: http://pastebin.com/510YK2Se
Using (LDC 0.12.0-beta 1 Ubuntu): http://pastebin.com/2gAWnYyr
Using (DMD Windows): Assertion failure: 'thisval && thisval->op
==
TOKclassreference' on line 4067 in file 'interpret.c' when
compiling this.
Thank you. I presume this bug is alr
Krzysztof Ciebiera:
Is the following compiler behavior consistent with language
specification?
Changing elements during foreach is something to avoid, perhaps
I'd like it to be statically forbidden. If you add to this the
reference-struct nature of arrays, you get in troubles.
Bye,
bearoph
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:08:15 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Saturday, 19 October 2013 at 13:20:28 UTC, develop32 wrote:
Hi,
Are there any recent improvements in how D interfaces with
C++? I got the impression that some work has been done on
that, in order to make DMD a self-hosting compiler.
On Saturday, 19 October 2013 at 13:20:28 UTC, develop32 wrote:
Hi,
Are there any recent improvements in how D interfaces with C++?
I got the impression that some work has been done on that, in
order to make DMD a self-hosting compiler.
I do not know of any recent improvements.
The current pl
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 10:31:51 UTC, Krzysztof Ciebiera
wrote:
Is the following compiler behavior consistent with language
specification?
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
int a[][] = [[1,2,3]];
foreach(x; a)
{
x[0] = 0;
x ~= 4;
}
writeln(a);
}
I under
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 10:41:38 UTC, Alexandr Druzhinin
wrote:
21.10.2013 17:31, Krzysztof Ciebiera пишет:
void main()
{
int a[][] = [[1,2,3]];
foreach(x; a)
{
x[0] = 0;
x ~= 4;
}
writeln(a);
}
...
&) or [0,2,3,4] (python, C++ ref). But [0,2,3]? It was
21.10.2013 17:31, Krzysztof Ciebiera пишет:
Is the following compiler behavior consistent with language specification?
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
int a[][] = [[1,2,3]];
foreach(x; a)
{
x[0] = 0;
x ~= 4;
}
writeln(a);
}
I understand why thw progra
Is the following compiler behavior consistent with language
specification?
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
int a[][] = [[1,2,3]];
foreach(x; a)
{
x[0] = 0;
x ~= 4;
}
writeln(a);
}
I understand why thw program could output [1,2,3] (like in C++
without &) or
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 08:12:49 UTC, Andrew wrote:
If you want to offer Direct3D in D as is (I prefer this option
instead of wrapper-libraries), you'll have to make it COM'ish
and C'ish :-)
I actually consider looking into this problem, I'm skilled C++
graphics programmer.
i think ab
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 07:56:49 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 07:46:41 UTC, Andrew wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 04:38:05 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Sunday, 20 October 2013 at 21:47:53 UTC, Erik van Velzen
wrote:
My goal was to learn D and Direct3D at the same tim
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 07:46:41 UTC, Andrew wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 04:38:05 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Sunday, 20 October 2013 at 21:47:53 UTC, Erik van Velzen
wrote:
My goal was to learn D and Direct3D at the same time.
I've tried to set up DMD to do this, but I keep running
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 04:38:05 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Sunday, 20 October 2013 at 21:47:53 UTC, Erik van Velzen
wrote:
My goal was to learn D and Direct3D at the same time.
I've tried to set up DMD to do this, but I keep running into
issues that the available DirectX11 and win32 headers
On 10/20/2013 10:59 PM, Agustin wrote:
> That didn't work, but after reading how emplace works, i had to make
> some changes.
>
> public T allocate(T : Object, A...)(auto ref A arguments) {
> auto pMemory = rawAllocate(__traits(classInstanceSize, T),
> T.alignof);
Does rawAllocate
46 matches
Mail list logo
