There seems a dichotomy between explicitly compile each d file (aka
module) and then link versus compile all the files (aka modules) at
once especially since the objects for each file/module are created in
both cases.
I am assuming there are also some DMD/GDC/LDC2 differences as well.
Currently
On Sunday, December 22, 2013 08:21:34 Russel Winder wrote:
There seems a dichotomy between explicitly compile each d file (aka
module) and then link versus compile all the files (aka modules) at
once especially since the objects for each file/module are created in
both cases.
I am assuming
On 12/21/2013 07:57 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/21/2013 05:44 PM, Charles Hixson wrote:
On 12/21/2013 03:52 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/21/2013 03:13 PM, John Colvin wrote:
Ideally the compiler will optimise your version to be fast, but
you may
find you get better performance by doing
On 12/22/2013 01:04 AM, Charles Hixson wrote:
Nice, but the block is longer than 8 bytes, so I should use a for (i =
n; i n + 8; i++) rather than a foreach, and index off of i.
Makes sense. That reminded me of the Phobos function that does exactly
what you want. Have you considered
On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 01:03 -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[…]
1. Unless you compile each of the separate files in parallel, it's faster to
compile everything at once, because you avoid having to reprocess all of the
imported modules. Parallel compiling still has to do all of that work, but
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 03:57:38 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/21/2013 05:44 PM, Charles Hixson wrote:
On 12/21/2013 03:52 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/21/2013 03:13 PM, John Colvin wrote:
Ideally the compiler will optimise your version to be fast,
but you may
find you get better
On 12/21/2013 11:19 PM, qznc wrote:
On Saturday, 21 December 2013 at 14:52:08 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
I just created a new vibe.d project using dub, all fine. Well once I had
solved the libevent problem. Then, as the project is to be a GUI client,
I added a gtk-d dependency. I tried building
On 2013-12-22 11:44, Russel Winder wrote:
I can see this being so where many files are changed between builds, but
I am working in a situation where I want to build and run after each
change of a file. So with large numbers of files only compiling one and
linking seems faster than compiling
On 2013-12-22 10:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
1. Unless you compile each of the separate files in parallel, it's faster to
compile everything at once, because you avoid having to reprocess all of the
imported modules. Parallel compiling still has to do all of that work, but the
gains from
On Sunday, December 22, 2013 10:44:15 Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 01:03 -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[…]
1. Unless you compile each of the separate files in parallel, it's faster
to compile everything at once, because you avoid having to reprocess all
of the imported
Hello,
I'm beginning with programming on desktop. After choosing which
language is da best for me, I chose D. And now I want to create
GUI applications, so I tried installing GtkD and I failed. Can
anybody give me a short manual?
I'd like to code on linux (openSUSE 13.1), but if I'll get help
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 13:29:04 UTC, Amateur wrote:
Hello,
I'm beginning with programming on desktop. After choosing which
language is da best for me, I chose D. And now I want to
create
GUI applications, so I tried installing GtkD and I failed. Can
anybody give me a short manual?
Hi all,
Can someone walk me through in a friendly way how to check the assembly produced
by dmd? The application in this case is checking some new patches to Phobos.
It's something I'm not familiar with doing in general and particularly not with
dmd (which doesn't seem to have an
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 13:38:25 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 13:29:04 UTC, Amateur wrote:
Hello,
I'm beginning with programming on desktop. After choosing which
language is da best for me, I chose D. And now I want to
create
GUI applications, so I tried
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 14:17:50 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Hi all,
Can someone walk me through in a friendly way how to check the
assembly produced by dmd? The application in this case is
checking some new patches to Phobos. It's something I'm not
familiar with doing in
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 14:31:44 UTC, Kelet wrote:
DMD never discretely generates assembly
To clarify, DMD goes straight from its intermediate
representation (IR) of the code to the binary opcodes, which is
part of the reason why it compiles faster relative to GDC or LDC.
Regards,
On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 12:58 +0100, Mike Wey wrote:
On 12/21/2013 11:19 PM, qznc wrote:
[…]
For some reason GtkD uses some unreleased version of Gtk with some
OpenGL features.
This is because the released version of GtkGLext doesn't support Gtk+ 3.x.
OK so that is why it isn't in Debian.
On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 13:14 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
[…]
There is a big chance this will result in link errors. I don't remember
the exact problems but it's something like DMD doesn't emit template
symbols to all object files it should. You can search these newsgroups
for incremental
Am 22.12.2013 15:15, schrieb Amateur:
Yeah, I installed dub and ran commands dub init main and dub fetch
--local gtk-d. It worked properly, but how to continue? I tried compile
simple app which contains only import gtk.MainWindow; and compiler
yells that source for this cannot be found.
What
On 12/22/2013 11:15 PM, Amateur wrote:
What have I to do next?
I have installed Gtk+ libraries, dmd, dub and I ran too commands dub
init main and dub fetch --local gtk-d.
You need to add gtkd as a dependency to your project's package.json:
{
dependencies: {
On Saturday, 21 December 2013 at 15:08:48 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
Is there a way of mocking the TCPConnect call so as to create a
connection to a mock instead of the real device so as to be
able to
integration test and system test a vibe.d-based client?
By forking vibe.d repository. No
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 14:31:44 UTC, Kelet wrote:
There is obj2asm by Walter, but it is part of the paid
Digital Mars package (AFAIK).
Correction: obj2asm actually seems to come with DMD for Linux and
Mac, but not Windows, where it seemingly needs to be purchased in
the C and C++
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 08:21:47 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Is there some critical feature which means that compile all
source at
once is a better route?
It is much faster if you have enough memory to afford it (imports
are no re-parsed). Also there have been some nasty symbol
On 22/12/13 15:42, Kelet wrote:
Correction: obj2asm actually seems to come with DMD for Linux and
Mac, but not Windows, where it seemingly needs to be purchased in
the C and C++ Development System or Extended Utility Package[1]
Hmm, is there a separate download? I'm running latest git-HEAD
On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 13:29 +, Amateur wrote:
Hello,
I'm beginning with programming on desktop. After choosing which
language is da best for me, I chose D. And now I want to create
GUI applications, so I tried installing GtkD and I failed. Can
anybody give me a short manual?
I cloned
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 14:39:23 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
I tend to use ldc2 or gdc rather than dmd, I suspect there are
a whole
different set of issues?
Yes, at least gdc has own tweaks to symbol emitting schemes and
some additionals flags to influence it.
Incremental compilation
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 03:17:42PM +0100, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Hi all,
Can someone walk me through in a friendly way how to check the
assembly produced by dmd? The application in this case is checking
some new patches to Phobos. It's something I'm not familiar with
doing in
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 07:04:54AM -0800, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 03:17:42PM +0100, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Hi all,
Can someone walk me through in a friendly way how to check the
assembly produced by dmd? The application in this case is checking
some new
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 14:17:50 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Hi all,
Can someone walk me through in a friendly way how to check the
assembly produced by dmd? The application in this case is
checking some new patches to Phobos. It's something I'm not
familiar with doing in
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 04:06:05 UTC, Alexandr Druzhinin
wrote:
22.12.2013 07:47, Gary Willoughby пишет:
When porting C headers which include function declarations
with using
char* types. Is it best to use const char* or const(char)* as
the type
in the D declaration?
C vs D
const
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 15:49:43 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Thanks, that makes sense. But how would i port this parameter:
and these:
CONST84 char **tablePtr = ?
CONST84 char ***argvPtr = ?
On 22/12/13 16:15, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 07:04:54AM -0800, H. S. Teoh wrote:
This is what I do:
dmd -oprogram mod1.d mod2.d ...
Also, using the -g switch here may help, by including information that
lets objdump figure out which identifiers are being referenced by
Am 22.12.2013 17:02, schrieb Gary Willoughby:
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 15:49:43 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Thanks, that makes sense. But how would i port this parameter:
and these:
CONST84 char **tablePtr = ?
CONST84 char ***argvPtr = ?
In C/C++ the const always applies to whatever
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 16:45:15 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 22.12.2013 17:02, schrieb Gary Willoughby:
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 15:49:43 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Thanks, that makes sense. But how would i port this parameter:
and these:
CONST84 char **tablePtr = ?
On 12/22/2013 02:22 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/22/2013 01:04 AM, Charles Hixson wrote:
Nice, but the block is longer than 8 bytes, so I should use a for (i =
n; i n + 8; i++) rather than a foreach, and index off of i.
Makes sense. That reminded me of the Phobos function that does exactly
Hello everybody.
In C++ it is considered good practice to qualify names in
namespaces, as in:
std::vectorint v;
std::cout std::endl;
How can this be done in D, with its std module?
For example I tried the following and it doesn't work.
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
std.writeln(Hello
On 12/22/2013 03:36 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 12:58 +0100, Mike Wey wrote:
On 12/21/2013 11:19 PM, qznc wrote:
[…]
For some reason GtkD uses some unreleased version of Gtk with some
OpenGL features.
This is because the released version of GtkGLext doesn't support Gtk+
On 12/22/2013 03:41 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
On 12/22/2013 11:15 PM, Amateur wrote:
What have I to do next?
I have installed Gtk+ libraries, dmd, dub and I ran too commands dub
init main and dub fetch --local gtk-d.
You need to add gtkd as a dependency to your project's package.json:
{
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 18:28:43 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 22.12.2013 18:39, schrieb Gary Willoughby:
Ah right, so:
struct Tcl_Obj * CONST * objv
would be:
const(Tcl_Obj*)* objv or const(Tcl_Obj*)[] objv
Yes
Great thanks! I thought i had a pretty good handle on C but
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 19:23:50 UTC, Cpluspluser wrote:
Hello everybody.
In C++ it is considered good practice to qualify names in
namespaces, as in:
std::vectorint v;
std::cout std::endl;
How can this be done in D, with its std module?
For example I tried the following and it
On Sunday, December 22, 2013 19:23:49 Cpluspluser wrote:
Hello everybody.
In C++ it is considered good practice to qualify names in
namespaces, as in:
std::vectorint v;
std::cout std::endl;
How can this be done in D, with its std module?
For example I tried the following and it
Am 22.12.2013 20:34, schrieb Gary Willoughby:
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 18:28:43 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 22.12.2013 18:39, schrieb Gary Willoughby:
Ah right, so:
struct Tcl_Obj * CONST * objv
would be:
const(Tcl_Obj*)* objv or const(Tcl_Obj*)[] objv
Yes
Great thanks! I
Cpluspluser:
In C++ it is considered good practice to qualify names in
namespaces, as in:
std::vectorint v;
std::cout std::endl;
How can this be done in D, with its std module?
Beside the answers already given you by others (of using
std.stdio.writeln after a normal import), in D there
On 12/22/13 20:21, Mike Wey wrote:
On 12/22/2013 03:36 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
Python now uses the reflection approach to providing a Python binding to
the API: PyGTK has given way to PyGobject. Has the PyGobject approach
been rejected for GtkD staying with the PyGtk approach?
I don't
Friends,
I'm writing a little molecular simulator. Without boring you with
the details, here's the gist of it:
struct Atom{
double x, vx;
double interaction(Atom a2){
return (a2.x-this.x)^^2; //more complicated in reality
}
}
main(){
Atom[] atoms = (a bunch of atoms in
On 22/12/13 22:07, Charles McAnany wrote:
So here's the conundrum: How do I parallelize this efficiently?
Does your simulation rely at all on pseudo-random number generation _inside_ the
loop? That is, apart from for generation of the initial array of atoms?
If it's purely deterministic,
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 21:07:11 UTC, Charles McAnany
wrote:
Friends,
I'm writing a little molecular simulator. Without boring you
with the details, here's the gist of it:
struct Atom{
double x, vx;
double interaction(Atom a2){
return (a2.x-this.x)^^2; //more
On 22/12/13 22:42, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
You might also find it beneficial -- since in each of the inner loops you're
reading from one set of values and writing to another -- to split up your array
of atoms into two arrays: double[] x and double[] vx -- and to find another way
of doing
On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 21:07:11 UTC, Charles McAnany
wrote:
How do I parallelize this efficiently?
From what you describe, std.parallelism would probably be
appropriate for this. However, from your problem description,
you're going to have a _lot_ of trouble with false sharing. I
Thanks for all your help understanding the algorithm chaining problem...
Now I have another gotcha.
This code compiles and runs OK if I remove the keyword pure or if I
remove the .retro
As I understand it retro should affect the pureness of the the function.
If I put the keyword in, it fails
El 22/12/13 14:29, Amateur ha escrit:
Hello,
I'm beginning with programming on desktop. After choosing which
language is da best for me, I chose D. And now I want to create
GUI applications, so I tried installing GtkD and I failed. Can
anybody give me a short manual?
I'd like to code on
John Carter:
Thanks for all your help understanding the algorithm chaining
problem...
Now I have another gotcha.
This code compiles and runs OK if I remove the keyword pure
or if I remove the .retro
Some functions can't be pure. Some functions can be pure but in
Phobos are not yet pure,
On 12/22/2013 02:37 PM, John Carter wrote:
This code compiles and runs OK if I remove the keyword pure or if I
remove the .retro
Third option: It compiles and runs OK if you upgrade your compiler. ;)
Works with DMD64 D Compiler v2.065-devel-41ebb59.
Ali
Yup.
That's the answer.
Upgraded to 2.064 and good things happened.
Diff shows flocks of diffs in std.range
Thanks.
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 12/22/2013 02:37 PM, John Carter wrote:
This code compiles and runs OK if I remove the keyword
D:\workspace\...dmd -v
DMD32 D Compiler v2.064
Copyright (c) 1999-2013 by Digital Mars written by Walter Bright
...
D:\workspace\...type bug1.d
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
}
D:\workspace\...dmd bug1.d
D:\D\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\stdio.d(35): Error: module
std.c.stdio import
This one's kinda short..
Is it possible to change the variable that gdc finds cc1d?
Something like gdc -gcc=/whatever/gcc_backend?
22.12.2013 11:06, Alexandr Druzhinin пишет:
22.12.2013 07:47, Gary Willoughby пишет:
When porting C headers which include function declarations with using
char* types. Is it best to use const char* or const(char)* as the type
in the D declaration?
C vs D
const char* == const(char)*
const char
57 matches
Mail list logo
