On 2014-01-08 19:04, H. S. Teoh wrote:
The reason I wrote it this way is so that it parallels the foreach
construction better:
my_foreach (i; range) {
...
}
parallels:
foreach (i; range) {
...
}
I guessed that.
Keep in mind t
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 10:48:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Through Reddit I've found posts about hash-based associative
arrays:
http://bannalia.blogspot.it/2013/10/implementation-of-c-unordered.html
I think the worry that a hash function should throw an exception
is a bit over the top? W
I've tried insert, indexing, ~=, etc but the length always
returns 0.
e.g.,
std.container.Array!int arr;
arr ~= 3;
writeln(arr.length);
works fine, but when the array is a property of a class, it does
not work, e.g.,
class x
{
std.container.Array!int _arr;
@property std.container.Array!int
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 12:13:14 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
I've tried insert, indexing, ~=, etc but the length always
returns 0.
e.g.,
std.container.Array!int arr;
arr ~= 3;
writeln(arr.length);
works fine, but when the array is a property of a class, it
does not work, e.g.,
class x
{
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 12:15:31 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 12:13:14 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
I've tried insert, indexing, ~=, etc but the length always
returns 0.
e.g.,
std.container.Array!int arr;
arr ~= 3;
writeln(arr.length);
works fine, but when the array
string[] r = aa.byKey.map!(k => [k, aa[k]]s).join;
Do you remember the bug report number and/or pull request number
for that enhancement?
Bye,
bearophile
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 12:19:25 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
I guess I see what is going on. Since Array is a struct, a
local copy is made and that never ends up updating the original?
How can I use it then like an object so this is not a problem?
returning by ref may do what you want:
@pr
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 13:32:08 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 12:19:25 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
I guess I see what is going on. Since Array is a struct, a
local copy is made and that never ends up updating the
original?
How can I use it then like an object so this i
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 09:49:17AM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2014-01-08 19:04, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> >In fact, we can already almost get the desired syntax in the current
> >language:
> >
> > /* Current D already supports this: */
> > range.my_foreach!((i,j) {
> > /*
Am 09.01.2014 11:48, schrieb bearophile:
Through Reddit I've found posts about hash-based associative arrays:
http://bannalia.blogspot.it/2013/10/implementation-of-c-unordered.html
http://bannalia.blogspot.it/2014/01/a-better-hash-table.html
Those little images like this one are excellent at ex
Does anybody know if there is a library like thread building
blocks for D? I imagine that it hasn't been ported or anything
given it is a C++ library and licensed inconveniently.
If not, is there something in Phobos similar to it or that would
help in making it? I may try writing something lik
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 19:15:50 UTC, Ross Hays wrote:
Does anybody know if there is a library like thread building
blocks for D? I imagine that it hasn't been ported or anything
given it is a C++ library and licensed inconveniently.
If not, is there something in Phobos similar to it or
Le 08/01/2014 21:29, Benjamin Thaut a écrit :
Am 08.01.2014 21:25, schrieb Xavier Bigand:
Is there a way to get backtrace outside exceptions?
Found a plattform independend way:
import core.runtime;
import std.stdio;
void main(string[] args)
{
auto trace = defaultTraceHandler(null);
On 2014-01-09 18:57, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I'm afraid that this might become ambiguous, for example:
int* gun(...) {...}
func (x==0)
*gun(y);
Does the second statement mean `func!(() => *gun(y))(x==0)`, or does it
mean `func(x==0) * gun(y)`? While it's not hard to
Hi all,
Well, the original post was long time ago, but I have a similar
problem now. I am linking static D library into C++ executable
and getting linker errors
Phobos64.lib(sections_win64_4f1_4e2.obj) : error LNK2019 :
unresolved external symbol _deh_beg referenced in function
_D2rt14secti
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 14:51:33 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 13:32:08 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 12:19:25 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
I guess I see what is going on. Since Array is a struct, a
local copy is made and that never ends up updat
I think maybe using alias this would not solve the problem? One
would have to dispatch all the calls on the class to the array.
(simply wrap the struct but prevent the compiler from thinking it
is a strut so it doesn't use value semantics on it)
Lets suppose I have setup some code to use a singleton object.
Now lets suppose I want to duplicate that code(say to run
multiple times simultaneously).
The singleton pattern itself prevents multiple copies. One would
need multiple instances to be able to run multiple times BUT in
the context
On Wednesday, 8 January 2014 at 23:38:31 UTC, Goran Petrevski
wrote:
I'm new in the programming, systems programming especially, but
I want to learn D more as a systems programming language and by
that I mean avoiding libraries at all. My goal is to write a
simple operating system totaly in D (
On Wednesday, 8 January 2014 at 21:37:24 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 01/08/2014 11:39 AM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
> So, "saflik" is "pure" in turkish, cool! I like the sound of
it. 8-D
It is never easy, is it? :)
The reason it is "saflik" in the URL is because file names
better be in ASCII due to
The std.xml documentation states "This module is considered
out-dated and not up to Phobos' current standards."
Does this mean that there is some other module I should use for
xml parsing? Maybe one that is not in the standard distribution
yet because it is beta?
I'd like to convert a xml-ba
You might want to look into XOmB:
https://github.com/xomboverlord/xomb
Isn't it written in D1? Not sure about that...
Playing around with BitArray I encountered the seemingly strange
interface of
---
bool[] b = [0, 1, 0];
BitArray a;
a.init(b);
---
Is there any reason 'init' is used rather than using a
constructor?
bool[] b = [0, 1, 0];
BitArray a = BitArray(b);
Seems a bit cl
On Friday, 10 January 2014 at 02:08:21 UTC, Adam S wrote:
Can anyone explain the reason for this setup?
BitArray was mostly written back in the D1 days, before structs
were allowed to have constructors. It got partially updated, but
the majority of its code is still an old style.
I recently
On 2014-01-10 01:02, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
" wrote:
The std.xml documentation states "This module is considered out-dated
and not up to Phobos' current standards."
Does this mean that there is some other module I should use for xml
parsing? Maybe one that is not in the standard distribution yet
25 matches
Mail list logo
