On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 14:28:01 UTC, Inquie wrote:
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 05:18:18 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 12 March 2017 at 21:38:44 UTC, Inquie wrote:
Is there any easy way to create a scope for termination of
the object?
I have a template method that takes a type an
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 17:47:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Binary comparison is easy. Just read the files by fixed-sized
chunks and compare them.
Follow up question... What is the best @safe way? Since
File.byChunk() is @system. Just out of curiosity, I would rather
use it and flag my code
On Tuesday, 14 March 2017 at 00:38:12 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
If you have enough declarations in one file that they call for
code folding, it may be better to move them to a separate
module. Public imports and aliases allow doing this without
breaking any code.
[...]
Generally speak
On Tuesday, 14 March 2017 at 01:08:50 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It does not, though if you really wanted to, you could probably
create template that did the same thing fairly easily.
I recently added something similar to dom.d, since I wanted to
pull a header if present, and was ok with a n
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 19:31:52 UTC, David Zhang wrote:
Basically, I want to define a common interface for a group of
platform-specific classes, except that they should ideally also
share constructor parameters. What I want to do is then alias
them to a common name, selecting the implem
On 14/03/2017 6:08 AM, Joakim wrote:
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 09:33:39 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 13/03/2017 7:48 PM, Joakim wrote:
[...]
Why exactly doesn't the Android port support dlopen, dlsym and dlclose?
It is provided by the NDK libc.
At least according to this[0].
[0] https:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 00:51:02 Jolly James via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Does anybody know, if D has a null-safe dereference operator like
> C# does (?.) or something similar?
It does not, though if you really wanted to, you could probably create
template that did the same thing fairly ea
Does anybody know, if D has a null-safe dereference operator like
C# does (?.) or something similar?
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 21:33:56 UTC, Inquie wrote:
One can say that it is a useless feature because D doesn't have
it... or one could say that D is useless because it doesn't
have it. A nice balance is simply to say "It is a useful
feature that has proven it's worth and it is time that D
On Monday, March 13, 2017 19:51:59 Inquie via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 18:26:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Monday, March 13, 2017 17:29:41 Inquie via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> Does D have any nice way to specify a block for cold folding?
> >> I
On 03/13/2017 11:58 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 22:05:24 UTC, Jack Applegame wrote:
Is this a bug?
No it's not
struct C
{
B!C;
}
is an error.
Howto compute C ? <--\
let's check the members; |
The member needs a template. |
Howto compute the template
On 03/14/2017 12:02 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 22:59:36 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
[...]
struct A(T) {
void m() {
char[T.sizeof] data;
}
}
/* ... rest as above ... */
I don't see how the destructor makes a difference. Soo, bug?
Try to use m.
Work
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 22:59:36 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 03/13/2017 03:26 PM, Jack Applegame wrote:
I'm pretty sure that this code should compile
(https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/cf1e1ee6ef4b):
struct A(T) {
~this() {
char[T.sizeof] data;
}
}
struct B(T) {
A!T foo;
}
struct C {
On 03/13/2017 03:26 PM, Jack Applegame wrote:
I'm pretty sure that this code should compile
(https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/cf1e1ee6ef4b):
struct A(T) {
~this() {
char[T.sizeof] data;
}
}
struct B(T) {
A!T foo;
}
struct C {
B!C bar;
}
void main() {
C c;
}
But it doesn't:
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 22:05:24 UTC, Jack Applegame wrote:
Is this a bug?
No it's not
struct C
{
B!C;
}
is an error.
Howto compute C ? <--\
let's check the members; |
The member needs a template. |
Howto compute the template ? |
let's compute the parameters. |
What
Is this a bug?
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 19:51:59 UTC, Inquie wrote:
This is wrong. It is a language feature.
#region lets you specify a block of code that you can expand or
collapse when using the outlining feature of the Visual Studio
Code Editor. In longer code files, it is convenient to be able
to co
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 21:17:31 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 17:29:41 UTC, Inquie wrote:
I have been using
static if(true)
{
... junk
}
Indeed #region is part of the C# specification, even if it has
no effect on the code. (The specification does not say anything
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 17:47:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Why it is not easy to do by hand?
Sorry typo, I had intended to type "I know it is easy"
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 17:29:41 UTC, Inquie wrote:
I have been using
static if(true)
{
... junk
}
Indeed #region is part of the C# specification, even if it has no
effect on the code. (The specification does not say anything
about folding/collapsing, just about "marking sections of
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 18:26:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2017 17:29:41 Inquie via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Does D have any nice way to specify a block for cold folding?
I have a very large set of structs and I'd like to be able to
code fold them all at once and t
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:47:09AM -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> P.S. I just realized that std.stdio.chunks() doesn't return a range.
> Bah. File an enhancement request. I might even submit a PR for it. ;-)
[...]
> P.P.S. It's not overly hard to write an alternative ver
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 17:52:09 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 02:15:21 UTC, David Zhang wrote:
What it says on the tin. Is there a way to create interfaces
with a constructor or must I use an abstract class.
What do you want to do in your constructor? I can't think of
On 13.03.2017 14:35, M-exe wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 21:32:05 UTC, sarn wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 19:24:29 UTC, bauss wrote:
Mark your variables with __gshared. I would say shred, but it has
some restrictions to it, where __gshared is the equivalent to global
variables in C.
On Monday, March 13, 2017 17:29:41 Inquie via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Does D have any nice way to specify a block for cold folding? I
> have a very large set of structs and I'd like to be able to code
> fold them all at once and together.
>
> I have been using
>
> static if(true)
> {
> ..
P.P.S. It's not overly hard to write an alternative version of
std.stdio.chunks that returns a real range. Something like this should
do:
// Warning: untested code
auto realChunks(File f, size_t blockSize)
{
static struct Result
{
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:50:49PM +, XavierAP via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> It's not easy to do by hand of course, but I was wondering if there
> was one simple function taking two file names and just returning a
> bool or something like that. I haven't found it in std.file.
Why it is not
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 02:15:21 UTC, David Zhang wrote:
What it says on the tin. Is there a way to create interfaces
with a constructor or must I use an abstract class.
What do you want to do in your constructor? I can't think of
anything that wouldn't change some state, either of the cl
Does D have any nice way to specify a block for cold folding? I
have a very large set of structs and I'd like to be able to code
fold them all at once and together.
I have been using
static if(true)
{
... junk
}
but the static if is uninformative since that is the only line
that is shown
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 14:47:20 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 08:07:39PM +, XavierAP via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...]
But I still like the version with pointers ;)
There's nothing wrong with using pointers in D. The fact that
D alleviates most cases of (explicit
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 06:41:46 UTC, M-exe wrote:
I found that D is great language, but for my own reasons I'm
trying to use it without TLS at all.
Can the TLS directory be avoided? (compiling on windows)
I don't know what you mean by the TLS directory, can you explain?
I mean, can it a
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 09:33:39 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 13/03/2017 7:48 PM, Joakim wrote:
[...]
Why exactly doesn't the Android port support dlopen, dlsym and
dlclose?
It is provided by the NDK libc.
At least according to this[0].
[0] https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/s
It's not easy to do by hand of course, but I was wondering if
there was one simple function taking two file names and just
returning a bool or something like that. I haven't found it in
std.file.
If such a function doesn't exist in Phobos but there's a good
implementation in some other librar
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 08:07:39PM +, XavierAP via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> I realized that the code that sparked the question made no sense and
> should be done in a different way... As is always the case when these
> questions come up.
> But I still like the version with pointers ;
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 00:23:36 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 03/13/2017 01:02 AM, Inquie wrote:
Ok, it doesn't work for appending though ;)
[...]
Tuple!(int, "A", double, "B")[] y;
y ~= tuple(3, 2.5);
Interestingly, this works:
Tuple!(int, "A", double, "B")[] y;
y.length += 1;
y
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 05:18:18 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 12 March 2017 at 21:38:44 UTC, Inquie wrote:
Is there any easy way to create a scope for termination of the
object?
I have a template method that takes a type and allocates and
deallocates based on that type.
class
I'm pretty sure that this code should compile
(https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/cf1e1ee6ef4b):
struct A(T) {
~this() {
char[T.sizeof] data;
}
}
struct B(T) {
A!T foo;
}
struct C {
B!C bar;
}
void main() {
C c;
}
But it doesn't:
/d300/f416.d(3): Error: struct f416.C no size
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 14:09:58 UTC, Inquie wrote:
Yeah, so, surely though we can extract the names from the
variable and then supply those like I mentioned?
Yeah, we prolly could, but a simpler thing might be to just use
typeof:
Tuple!(int, "A")[] x;
x ~= typeof(x[0])(3
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 00:51:27 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 00:02:12 UTC, Inquie wrote:
I just figured it didn't work in general, but seems to be an
issue with appending.
Oh, it is because of the implicit construction thing, see my
answer here to learn more:
ht
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 21:32:05 UTC, sarn wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 19:24:29 UTC, bauss wrote:
Mark your variables with __gshared. I would say shred, but it
has some restrictions to it, where __gshared is the equivalent
to global variables in C.
immutable variables are also not
On Sun, 2017-03-12 at 16:38 +0100, Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
>
[…]
>
> https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDMD/tree/dport
>
> gdmd -unittest --main
>
> The unittest flag for GDC is -funittest but there's no flag to
> generate
> a main function. gdmd generates a temporary f
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 10:11:35 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 06:48:01 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
The alpha release of DerelictSDL2 3.0 supports static linking.
When compiling manually, it requires
-version=DerelictSDL_static on the command line and all files
match
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 06:48:01 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 10:35:18 UTC, dummy wrote:
[...]
Regarding the link to that forum post, that bug has since been
found and fixed.
If you're planning on using Derelict, there is an issue where
all Derelict libraries are loa
In hibernate,update object is set all table columns to sql.
code for example:
```
//orm entity
class User {
int id;
string firstName;
string lastName;
}
Session sess = factory.openSession();
User user =sess.createQuery("FROM User WHERE
first_name=:firstName").setParam
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 06:48:01 UTC, Joakim wrote:
If you're planning on using Derelict, there is an issue where
all Derelict libraries are loaded as shared libraries, whereas
the Android port currently doesn't support loading shared
libraries. If DLangUI is using SDL2, maybe he has a he
On 13/03/2017 7:48 PM, Joakim wrote:
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 10:35:18 UTC, dummy wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 at 10:24:24 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 at 12:06:48 UTC, dummy wrote:
Just thought. I do want to know. :-)
As far as I know is,
* LDC2 woring on NDK(yah!)
46 matches
Mail list logo
