On Wednesday, 15 March 2017 at 19:34:32 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/15/2017 03:23 AM, Basile B. wrote:
> you can use a mixin template because
> they can introduce destructors that are called automatically
with the
> aggregate destrcutor
Wow! Is this specified anywhere or have you come across
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 07:49:19 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 March 2017 at 19:34:32 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/15/2017 03:23 AM, Basile B. wrote:
> you can use a mixin template because
> they can introduce destructors that are called automatically
with the
> aggregate destrc
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 13:01:36 Inquie via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 March 2017 at 03:50:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 03:43:20 Inquie via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> [...]
> >
> > Related: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bu
I downloaded dmd2 nightly and tried to compile the compiler using
the visual studio project. Using VS2014
I got several errors. There seems to be issue with locations of
things in the project.
1. I had to download default_ddoc_theme.ddoc from the net and put
it in /dmd2/src/dmd/vcbuild so t
I'm writing promise library, and perform testing like this..
app = new Application();
Promise p = app.exec(delegate void(){ // first delegate
write("Hello");
std.stdio.stdout.flush;
int xxx = 777;
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 14:53:27 UTC, Eko Wahyudin wrote:
How D access xxx variable? where context pointer refer to?
How D keep xxx variable persistent?
Why xxx is not swapped out when we leave first delegate?
The compiler sees that you are going to reference the variable,
and copies it
I was looking for ways to find the largest common substring
between two given substrings and have learnt
1. .length is of type ulong
2. writing string[int] will not give me a sorted array
3. ulong cannot be sorted by sorted
What's the trick to sort the associative array by their keys?
Code snip
What's going on here?
```
import std.digest.md, std.stdio;
void main() {
string ans = hex("qwertyuiop");
writeln(ans);
}
string hex(string arg) {
string ans = md5Of(arg).toHexString();
writeln(ans);
return ans;
}
```
This compiles, and when run writes out corrupt nonsense fro
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 16:13:33 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
string ans = md5Of(arg).toHexString();
That is a major D design flaw biting you the same way it has
bitten so many others.
See the red box in my documentation fork:
http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/std.digest.digest
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 16:02:13 UTC, helxi wrote:
I was looking for ways to find the largest common substring
between two given substrings and have learnt
1. .length is of type ulong
Only when compiling to 64 bits. On 32-bit target it's different.
2. writing string[int] will not give
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 16:02:13 UTC, helxi wrote:
1. .length is of type ulong
Either use auto or if needed size_t. As Thedeemon says this is an
alias of ulong on 64-bit and uint on 32.
https://dlang.org/spec/hash-map.html
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 16:21:08 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 16:13:33 UTC, Carl Sturtivant
wrote:
string ans = md5Of(arg).toHexString();
That is a major D design flaw biting you the same way it has
bitten so many others.
See the red box in my documentat
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:21:08PM +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 16:13:33 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
> > string ans = md5Of(arg).toHexString();
>
> That is a major D design flaw biting you the same way it has bitten so
> many others.
>
>
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 16:21:08 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
If I replace md5Of(arg).toHexString() with
toHexString(md5Of(arg))
That works for me though... maybe it is just a version mismatch
or something, since toHexString is in a different module than
md5of.
I have this problem on
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 16:47:14 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
Silently cast to immutable without
copying!??!! This is so wrong.
It is the implicit slicing that I really want removed from the
language, it serves no real benefit and brings a lot of
accidental complexity. Casting the stati
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 16:56:11 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
"toHexString.d(11): Error: function expected before (), not
module toHexString of type void"
Module???
huh idk.
use my search engine btw! http://dpldocs.info/toHexString
it is in `std.digest.digest` but that should be public
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 16:46:43 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
WAT?! Why does the language allow implicitly casting from
static array to string?! How is that even remotely correct?
Is there a bug filed for this?
Yeah, somewhere, bugzilla search sucks but I know it is in there
somewhere. We'
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:01:56 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 16:56:11 UTC, Carl Sturtivant
wrote:
"toHexString.d(11): Error: function expected before (), not
module toHexString of type void"
Module???
huh idk.
use my search engine btw! http://dpldocs.info/t
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:12:08 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
I did that, and it made no difference. :(
wait a minute i just realized:
toHexString.d(11) in the error message
You named the file toHexString which means the *module* will be
named toHexString by default...
So using the na
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 16:59:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Yet the documentation says there's a toHexString that returns
a string.
Yes, indeed, it returns a string if it is passed a dynamic
array.
Ah, that's the distinction, should have noticed.
Remember though, like I warned on my do
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:59:40PM +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 16:47:14 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
> > Silently cast to immutable without copying!??!!
> > This is so wrong.
>
> It is the implicit slicing that I really want removed from the
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:18:30 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:12:08 UTC, Carl Sturtivant
wrote:
I did that, and it made no difference. :(
wait a minute i just realized:
toHexString.d(11) in the error message
You named the file toHexString which means the *
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:20:45 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I'm not convinced casting static array to immutable is OK.
Check this out:
import std.stdio;
char[32] func() {
char[32] staticArr = "A123456789abcdefB123456789abcdef";
return staticArr; // OK,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:06:39PM +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> In isolation, implicit slicing can make sense but not with
> templates. In isolation, implicit immutable can make sense... but not
> with implicit slicing.
[...]
Is implicit slicing the culprit in t
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:20:45 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I'm not convinced casting static array to immutable is OK.
Check this out:
You aren't casting static array to immutable there, it is being
implicitly sliced AND cased to immutable.
What I mean is:
char[32] s;
immutable(char)[32]
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:40:51 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Seems like the real cause of bug 17261 is implicit slicing.
Yes, sorry, it took me 10 mins to type it up (I like to double
check the current behavior before posting) but I think we both
see it the same way now.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:40:51AM -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> Is implicit slicing the culprit in the issue I just filed? (Bug 17261)
>
> In retrospect, perhaps implicit casting to immutable is OK if we don't
> allow implicit slicing:
>
> char[32] func() { char
I'd like to try making a simple web app using vibrant.d, however
I don't think I'm using it correctly since I'm getting a linking
error when compiling.
Below is my SDL with added vibrant.d dependency:
name "cvmaker"
description "A simple vibe.d server application."
authors "drifter"
copyright
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:51:41 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:40:51 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Seems like the real cause of bug 17261 is implicit slicing.
Yes, sorry, it took me 10 mins to type it up (I like to double
check the current behavior before posting)
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:20:10 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
OK, but if I try to do this,
char[2] u;
string s = u;
Yeah, that's because `u` is not necessarily unique like a
function return value:
char[2] u;
char[] mutable = u[];
string s = u[];
char before = s[0];
mutable[0] = 'n';
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:47:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Actually, the bug still exists even if you explicitly slice it:
string x = func()[]; // still compiles, but shouldn't
I don't call that a bug, once it is explicitly done it means the
programmer realized something is up and
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 18:07:09 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:51:41 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:40:51 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Seems like the real cause of bug 17261 is implicit slicing.
Yes, sorry, it took me 10 mins
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:09:52PM +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:47:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Actually, the bug still exists even if you explicitly slice it:
> >
> > string x = func()[]; // still compiles, but shouldn't
>
> I don't
On Sunday, 19 July 2015 at 13:41:19 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 22:53:55 +, Minas Mina wrote:
bump
sorry, i was wrong about GC non-calling. yet we still need more
info: how long it works before crashing, how much threads it
runs, how many "git clone" commands were ok before c
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 18:10:43 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
But in that case, wouldn't that mean implicit slicing isn't to
blame here? (Not that I'm arguing for implicit slicing -- I
think it needs to go, too, having been bitten by it before --
but this particular case wouldn't constitute as
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 18:07:09 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
Why don't you use -dip1000???
Because it isn't the default. But even if it was, people would
ask "why is this giving me an error?" and the same explanation
would need to be given. Certainly, a compile error is better
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:41:40PM +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 18:10:43 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > But in that case, wouldn't that mean implicit slicing isn't to blame
> > here? (Not that I'm arguing for implicit slicing -- I think it needs
>
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 19:00:08 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Actually, https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12625 shows
that implicit slicing is still a problem:
Oh yikes, I figured it would still be copied onto the local stack
even though it is an rvalue.
But you know, the fact that so
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:17:41PM +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 19:00:08 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Actually, https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12625 shows that
> > implicit slicing is still a problem:
>
> Oh yikes, I figured it would
On 2017-03-14 14:32, Suliman wrote:
Does it work fine on Linux with x64 Postgres?
I've tested it on macOS and Linux 64bit. Works great.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 18:51:45 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Phobos could have been written to avoid this problem too,
there's a few solutions that work, but right now, using the
standard library in a way people expect to work will be
silently disastrous.
Yes, and as an outsider I find th
On Thursday, March 16, 2017 20:42:21 Carl Sturtivant via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Implicitly slicing rvalue arrays is too much like implicitly
> taking the address of an rvalue.
Well, that's just it. That's _exactly_ what's happening. It's just that it
ends up in a struct with a length member
Hi,
I have two structs and want to cast between them. The cast is
generalizable, so I want to keep it outside of the structs
themselves (I'll be adding more later). How can I do this? I've
tried the following so far:
struct Event {
EventID id;
ubyte[32 - EventID.sizeof] p
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 02:36:15PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> Honestly, I think that it was a big mistake to have implicit slicing
> of static arrays in the language at all.
That makes at least 3 of us -- Adam, you, me. I'm sure there are more.
> Unfortunatel
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 09:36:31PM +, David Zhang via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two structs and want to cast between them. The cast is
> generalizable, so I want to keep it outside of the structs themselves
> (I'll be adding more later). How can I do this?
AFAIK, the opXXX(
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:51:45PM +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 18:07:09 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
> > Why don't you use -dip1000???
>
> Because it isn't the default. But even if it was, people would ask
> "why is this giving me an
struct VARIANT {
union {
struct {
VARTYPE vt;
WORD wReserved1;
WORD wReserved2;
WORD wReserved3;
union {
int lVal;
LONGLONG llVal;
ubyte bVal;
short iVal;
This is my first 100+ line D program.
https://gitlab.com/pmiess/101gamesDlangComputerGames/blob/master/
aceyducy.d
Its a translation/refactor of aceyducy from 101 basic programs.
Could someone look over it and see if I've made any glaring mistakes.
Suggestions are welcome also.
Thanks,
Phil
Instead of
if (x == a || x == b || x = c || )
is there an easier way
stuff like
if (x in [a,b,c,..])
doesn't work.
On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 00:34:22 UTC, Hussien wrote:
Anyway to do this?
I don't think you can, the inner anonymous structs are just to
organize the members and group them inside the union.
On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 00:39:15 UTC, Hussien wrote:
if (x in [a,b,c,..])
import std.algorithm.comparison;
x.among(a, b, c);
http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/std.algorithm.comparison.among.1.html
foreach (y; aliasSeqOf!["a", "b", "c"])
{
static if (y == "a") { }
else
pragma(msg, y);
}
works but
foreach (y; aliasSeqOf!["a", "b", "c"])
{
static if (y == "a") continue
pragma(msg, y);
}
fails.
Seems like continue needs to be static aware.
This leads to subtle bugs where one thinks the co
On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 01:27:01 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 00:39:15 UTC, Hussien wrote:
if (x in [a,b,c,..])
import std.algorithm.comparison;
x.among(a, b, c);
http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/std.algorithm.comparison.among.1.html
thanks
On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 01:34:52 UTC, Hussien wrote:
Seems like continue needs to be static aware.
That's not a bug, pragma is triggered when the code is
*compiled*, not when it is run. The code is compiled, even if it
is skipped over by a continue.
On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 01:19:54 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 00:34:22 UTC, Hussien wrote:
Anyway to do this?
I don't think you can, the inner anonymous structs are just to
organize the members and group them inside the union.
;/ D should retain the structure in
On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 01:41:47 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 01:34:52 UTC, Hussien wrote:
Seems like continue needs to be static aware.
That's not a bug, pragma is triggered when the code is
*compiled*, not when it is run. The code is compiled, even if
it is ski
I remember this game from many many years ago. :)
On 03/16/2017 05:35 PM, Philip Miess wrote:
This is my first 100+ line D program.
https://gitlab.com/pmiess/101gamesDlangComputerGames/blob/master/
aceyducy.d
Its a translation/refactor of aceyducy from 101 basic programs.
Could someone look over
On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 00:35:32 UTC, Philip Miess wrote:
This is my first 100+ line D program.
https://gitlab.com/pmiess/101gamesDlangComputerGames/blob/master/
aceyducy.d
Its a translation/refactor of aceyducy from 101 basic programs.
Could someone look over it and see if I've made any glar
On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 01:52:20 UTC, Hussien wrote:
On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 01:19:54 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 17 March 2017 at 00:34:22 UTC, Hussien wrote:
Anyway to do this?
I don't think you can, the inner anonymous structs are just to
organize the members and group th
Dne 17.3.2017 v 02:34 Hussien via Digitalmars-d-learn napsal(a):
foreach (y; aliasSeqOf!["a", "b", "c"])
{
static if (y == "a") { }
else
pragma(msg, y);
}
works but
foreach (y; aliasSeqOf!["a", "b", "c"])
{
static if (y == "a") continue
pragma(msg, y);
}
fails.
Seems like continue needs to
60 matches
Mail list logo
