On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 19:38:39 UTC, ParticlePeter wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 14:45:43 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 11:45:34 UTC, ParticlePeter
wrote:
[snip]
I have a enhancement for dub in my mind, which would also
solve your issue. Similiar to
Thank you all for the interesting suggestions.
On 9/1/20 2:55 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/1/20 2:20 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Using RangeError is nice as it allows code to use array index inside
`nothrow.`
This is the big sticking point -- code that is nothrow would no longer
be able to use AAs. It makes the idea, unfortunately,
Hi All,
Thank you for your replies. My tests have been via compiler
explorer.
https://godbolt.org/z/4f9nKj I have done this without -BetterC,
as the dynamic array fails. I guess that uses GC? Is there an
alternative that works with BetterC for dynamic arrays?
Thank you for the other WASM l
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 14:45:43 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 11:45:34 UTC, ParticlePeter
wrote:
[snip]
I have a enhancement for dub in my mind, which would also solve
your issue. Similiar to setup.py in python you would be able to
define an entry point in d
On 9/1/20 3:09 PM, Andrey Zherikov wrote:
Unfortunately this won't work if there is a function 'bar' in different
module that calls 'foo':
You should post a full example you expect to work or not work, then we
can discuss.
I think it should work (I've tried it), but there are several problem
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 18:55:20 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
This is the big sticking point -- code that is nothrow would no
longer be able to use AAs. It makes the idea, unfortunately, a
non-starter.
You could always catch it though.
But I kinda like things the way they are exac
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 18:19:55 UTC, Andrey Zherikov
wrote:
The thing I'm trying to implement is: I have a function
foo(string s)() and some "state"; this function should override
this "state" (using "s" param) for all code within this
function (note that code can execute other modules
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 18:57:30 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
string overrideState(string s)
{
// work your magic here, it's normal D code!
}
void foo(string s)()
{
mixin(overrideState(s));
}
Unfortunately this won't work if there is a function 'bar' in
different module that
On 9/1/20 2:19 PM, Andrey Zherikov wrote:
On Monday, 31 August 2020 at 20:44:16 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 31 August 2020 at 20:39:10 UTC, Andrey Zherikov wrote:
How can I do that?
You can use a normal string[] BUT it is only allowed to be modified
inside its own function.
Then y
On 9/1/20 2:20 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Using RangeError is nice as it allows code to use array index inside
`nothrow.`
This is the big sticking point -- code that is nothrow would no longer
be able to use AAs. It makes the idea, unfortunately, a non-starter.
What is wrong with using `in`?
This is going to be a hard one for me to argue but I'm going to
give it a try.
Today if you attempt to access a key from an associative array
(AA) that does not exist inside the array, a RangeError is
thrown. This is similar to when an array is accessed outside the
bounds.
```
string[string
On Monday, 31 August 2020 at 20:44:16 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 31 August 2020 at 20:39:10 UTC, Andrey Zherikov
wrote:
How can I do that?
You can use a normal string[] BUT it is only allowed to be
modified inside its own function.
Then you assign that function to an enum or whate
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 11:45:34 UTC, ParticlePeter wrote:
Hello,
I have a targetType sourceLibrary and demonstrate its usage
through a subPackage. For the library itself 'dub run' is
meaningless, but not for the subPackage.
Is there a way to tell dub through dub.sdl or dub.json to bui
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 02:08:54 UTC, JG wrote:
[...]
Here is some fun with operator overloading and pointers, but I
don't really like it because it seems unsafe:
import std;
auto _(T...)(return ref T refs) @safe {
static struct Assigner(Ptrs...) {
@disable this(this);
Hello,
I have a targetType sourceLibrary and demonstrate its usage
through a subPackage. For the library itself 'dub run' is
meaningless, but not for the subPackage.
Is there a way to tell dub through dub.sdl or dub.json to build
and run a specific subPackage by default, without having to call
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 02:08:54 UTC, JG wrote:
Is there anyway to remove the boilerplate code of dealing with
tuples:
I find myself having to write things like this fairly often
auto someRandomName = f(...); //where f returns a tuple with
two parts
auto firstPart = someRandomName[0
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 02:08:54 UTC, JG wrote:
Is there anyway to remove the boilerplate code of dealing with
tuples:
I find myself having to write things like this fairly often
auto someRandomName = f(...); //where f returns a tuple with
two parts
auto firstPart = someRandomName[0
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 02:48:08 UTC, Ben Jones wrote:
Thanks all.
I tried using alias this at first and then I get errors trying
to construct AliasType objects:
auto pi = Payload!int(5);
auto pe = ParseError("error");
alias PRType = ParseResult!(Payload!int, ParseError);
auto pr =
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 01:29:43 UTC, Marcone wrote:
I need package Dlang in a standalone portable executable.
I need packcages all dependencies, dlls, files, etc in one
executable file.
Please see here
https://p0nce.github.io/d-idioms/#Embed-a-dynamic-library-in-an-executable
Kind re
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 03:51:10 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 02:08:54 UTC, JG wrote:
Is there anyway to remove the boilerplate code of dealing with
tuples:
I find myself having to write things like this fairly often
auto someRandomName = f(...); //where f ret
21 matches
Mail list logo
