On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 01:00:30 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 05:47:01 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
Thanks. Bummer. I really like gl3n, but glm/opengl is used
almost exclusively in all the modern opengl code (tutorials)
I've seen, so this might be a deal breaker. As
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 05:47:01 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
Thanks. Bummer. I really like gl3n, but glm/opengl is used
almost exclusively in all the modern opengl code (tutorials)
I've seen, so this might be a deal breaker. As the author of
Derelict do you have any ideas of how much work i
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 05:47:01 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 04:37:43 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 02:51:57 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
Is gl3n not a direct replacement for glm?
From the very top of the gl3n github page:
"OpenGL Maths
On Monday, 11 January 2016 at 10:04:29 UTC, Luis wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 06:35:34 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 02:51:57 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
Just translating some simple C++/glm/opengl tutorial code to
D/gl3n/opengl and I'm coming across more friction than I
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 06:35:34 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 02:51:57 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
Just translating some simple C++/glm/opengl tutorial code to
D/gl3n/opengl and I'm coming across more friction than I
expected. I've got a square centered at my window whic
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 10:38:07 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 10:35:34 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
It's pretty strange that there is no "translate" method...
Didn't see it in the online docs, but in the source there is
the "translate" method that you should use.
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 10:35:34 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
It's pretty strange that there is no "translate" method...
Didn't see it in the online docs, but in the source there is the
"translate" method that you should use.
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 02:51:57 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
I thought just swapping the order would fix things:
transform = transform.rotate(0.78539, vec3(0.0f, 0.0f, 1.0f));
transform = transform.translation(vec3(0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f));
but now the square is moved to the lower right corner bu
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 06:35:34 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 02:51:57 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
Just translating some simple C++/glm/opengl tutorial code to
D/gl3n/opengl and I'm coming across more friction than I
expected. I've got a square centered at my window whic
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 02:51:57 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
Just translating some simple C++/glm/opengl tutorial code to
D/gl3n/opengl and I'm coming across more friction than I
expected. I've got a square centered at my window which is
rotated by 45 degrees (counter clockwise) and then m
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 04:37:43 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 02:51:57 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
Is gl3n not a direct replacement for glm?
From the very top of the gl3n github page:
"OpenGL Maths for D (not glm for D)."
So, no, it is not. You might want to s
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 02:51:57 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
Is gl3n not a direct replacement for glm?
From the very top of the gl3n github page:
"OpenGL Maths for D (not glm for D)."
So, no, it is not. You might want to start with the glm
documentaion [1].
[1] http://dav1dde.github
Just translating some simple C++/glm/opengl tutorial code to
D/gl3n/opengl and I'm coming across more friction than I
expected. I've got a square centered at my window which is
rotated by 45 degrees (counter clockwise) and then moved to the
lower right quadrant.
// C++ glm opengl code
glm:
13 matches
Mail list logo
