On 12/21/2012 10:30 AM, r_m_r wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Combining_Structs)
the link should be: http://wiki.dlang.org/Combining_structs
regards,
r_m_r
On 12/21/2012 07:18 AM, js.mdnq wrote:
struct S_A { int x; int y; void func(); void funcA(); }
struct S_B { int x; int z; void func(); void funcB(); }
then GenUnion(S_A, S_B) will produce a struct like
S_AB
{
int x;
int y;
int z; //did u miss this? ;)
void func();
void fu
On Thursday, 20 December 2012 at 04:17:48 UTC, r_m_r wrote:
On 12/18/2012 04:42 AM, js.mdnq wrote:
It looks like the approach 2 does what I'm looking for pretty
nicely
except that, If I'm not mistaken the user struct will error
out when
trying to access members from the master.
Another appro
On 12/18/2012 04:42 AM, js.mdnq wrote:
It looks like the approach 2 does what I'm looking for pretty nicely
except that, If I'm not mistaken the user struct will error out when
trying to access members from the master.
Another approach that works: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/966d9f3a
(could have been
On 12/18/2012 04:42 AM, js.mdnq wrote:
In any case, it seems your method does not work with methods? if I add
the `check()` to your approach-2 it fails with several strange errors.
Any ideas?
approach-2 can only combine struct fields (i.e., no method support - for
that you have to use approac
On Monday, 17 December 2012 at 22:24:58 UTC, r_m_r wrote:
On 12/17/2012 04:33 AM, js.mdnq wrote:
Well, it a slightly another way and close. Let me see if I can
come up
with something that expresses better what I'm after. It will
be a week
or two though till I get around to it probably.
OK. I
On 12/17/2012 04:33 AM, js.mdnq wrote:
Well, it a slightly another way and close. Let me see if I can come up
with something that expresses better what I'm after. It will be a week
or two though till I get around to it probably.
OK. I'll just leave this here for future reference:
http://dpaste.
On Sunday, 16 December 2012 at 20:29:19 UTC, r_m_r wrote:
On 12/16/2012 02:03 PM, js.mdnq wrote:
That looks like it might be pretty close. I was also thinking
that one
could just use mixin templates of trying to do it with structs
directly.
i dunno if this is what u want, but have a look:
ht
On Sunday, 16 December 2012 at 15:34:34 UTC, Philippe Sigaud
wrote:
One could also think of it as an algebra of structs.
It would be nice to be able to do stuff like
A + B, A - B(possibly useless), A*B(possibly useless), etc...
A + B would just combine the members, A - B could remove the
memb
On 12/16/2012 02:03 PM, js.mdnq wrote:
That looks like it might be pretty close. I was also thinking that one
could just use mixin templates of trying to do it with structs directly.
i dunno if this is what u want, but have a look:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/f5616d77
cheers,
r_m_r
> it would be real nice if I there was a compile time construct for this.
> like "me" or something that would return type info inside the current
scope.
>
> class A(T) { this() { writeln(me.typeinfo.name); }
>
> would print "A(T)".
>
> (of course me is probably a bad name but just an example :)
>
On Sunday, 16 December 2012 at 08:49:10 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
On Sunday, 16 December 2012 at 06:38:13 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 16:32:27 UTC, r_m_r wrote:
On 12/15/2012 08:57 PM, anonymous wrote:
Note that here s1alpha and s2alpha are distinct types.
what about thi
On Sunday, 16 December 2012 at 06:38:13 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 16:32:27 UTC, r_m_r wrote:
On 12/15/2012 08:57 PM, anonymous wrote:
Note that here s1alpha and s2alpha are distinct types.
what about this: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/95f7a74d
Consider
struct Foo {mix
On Sunday, 16 December 2012 at 01:32:44 UTC, r_m_r wrote:
On 12/16/2012 06:36 AM, r_m_r wrote:
this is the closest I can get: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/9d11d060
Cleaned up a bit: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/d9f001db
regards,
r_m_r
That looks like it might be pretty close. I was also thinking
that on
On 12/16/2012 12:08 PM, anonymous wrote:
Foo.s1alpha and Bar.s1alpha are the same type. In my version they are not.
OK. Fair Enough :-)
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 16:32:27 UTC, r_m_r wrote:
On 12/15/2012 08:57 PM, anonymous wrote:
Note that here s1alpha and s2alpha are distinct types.
what about this: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/95f7a74d
Consider
struct Foo {mixin (genStruct!("s1"));}
struct Bar {mixin (genStruct!("s1"));}
On 12/16/2012 06:36 AM, r_m_r wrote:
this is the closest I can get: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/9d11d060
Cleaned up a bit: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/d9f001db
regards,
r_m_r
On 12/16/2012 05:30 AM, js.mdnq wrote:
and mixin the UserStruct.S with the MasterStruct_A
this is the closest I can get: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/9d11d060
regards,
r_m_r
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 23:04:37 UTC, r_m_r wrote:
On 12/16/2012 04:00 AM, js.mdnq wrote:
Now, the next step is to be able to "insert" code into the
struct! ;)
how about this: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/8161d00a
regards,
r_m_r
No, it's backwards! ;)
Or, sort of what one wants to do is:
On 12/16/2012 04:00 AM, js.mdnq wrote:
Now, the next step is to be able to "insert" code into the struct! ;)
how about this: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/8161d00a
regards,
r_m_r
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 19:09:25 UTC, r_m_r wrote:
On 12/10/2012 01:24 AM, js.mdnq wrote:
which will fail or not be what I want, since I want to
generate the
structs s1 and s1.
how about this: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/c0325def
regards,
r_m_r
Cool, That looks like a step in the right
On 12/10/2012 01:24 AM, js.mdnq wrote:
which will fail or not be what I want, since I want to generate the
structs s1 and s1.
how about this: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/c0325def
regards,
r_m_r
On 12/15/2012 08:57 PM, anonymous wrote:
Note that here s1alpha and s2alpha are distinct types.
what about this: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/95f7a74d
regards,
r_m_r
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 15:15:21 UTC, r_m_r wrote:
On 12/10/2012 01:43 AM, anonymous wrote:
Maybe it helps if you see it in action:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/5d4cb742
Note that here s1alpha and s2alpha are distinct types.
Here's a slightly modified version:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/f2bd142
On 12/10/2012 01:43 AM, anonymous wrote:
Maybe it helps if you see it in action: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/5d4cb742
Here's a slightly modified version: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/f2bd1428
regards,
r_m_r
On 2012-12-09 11:42, js.mdnq wrote:
How can I create mixes of stringified code and code itself?
http://dlang.org/mixin.html
explains how to create structs using strings. But what if I do not want
to have to encode the whole struct as a string but only parts of it?
mixin template GenStruct(str
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 06:26:15 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 13.12.2012 04:32, schrieb js.mdnq:
I think the issue I have with all this is that when you put
code
inside a string you lose a lot of compile time features AFAICT.
your right - but...try to come up with an similar ("easy
Am 13.12.2012 04:32, schrieb js.mdnq:
I think the issue I have with all this is that when you put code
inside a string you lose a lot of compile time features AFAICT.
your right - but...try to come up with an similar ("easy" to implement)
powerfull solution that is not based on strings and you
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 22:01:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/10/2012 01:52 PM, js.mdnq wrote:
> I want to avoid having to wrap the code with "
> " as it disables highlighting and possibly other
features(intellisense,
> etc...))
The q{} syntax is supposed to help with that issue. Emacs
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 01:09:28 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
Take the example here:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/vrupqijwqmccdpabm...@forum.dlang.org
note how he provides the body of the method in the mixin. I
would like to something similar to what he has done but provide
the body of the m
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 22:01:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/10/2012 01:52 PM, js.mdnq wrote:
> I want to avoid having to wrap the code with "
> " as it disables highlighting and possibly other
features(intellisense,
> etc...))
The q{} syntax is supposed to help with that issue. Emacs
On 12/10/2012 01:52 PM, js.mdnq wrote:
> I want to avoid having to wrap the code with "
> " as it disables highlighting and possibly other features(intellisense,
> etc...))
The q{} syntax is supposed to help with that issue. Emacs manages syntax
highlighting correctly for the q{} strings:
imp
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 20:17:41 UTC, Philippe Sigaud
wrote:
If I'm not mistaken isn't the "code" I'm trying to generate
still in a
string?
Well, yes, but not when you mix it in. It's a string mixin in
this case,
not a template mixin.
My whole point is not to use strings to insert
> If I'm not mistaken isn't the "code" I'm trying to generate still in a
> string?
>
Well, yes, but not when you mix it in. It's a string mixin in this case,
not a template mixin.
>
> (you've unfortunately left out the most important part at `//build your
> code here`)
>
Because it's just simp
On Sunday, 9 December 2012 at 19:54:17 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
On Sunday, 9 December 2012 at 19:34:05 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Sunday, 9 December 2012 at 19:24:24 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
In this particular case you can do this:
mixin template GenStruct(string stringname)
{
struct S
{
}
If you need a small example for code generation, the following code will
generate code for translating any enum value into a string:
string EnumToStringGenerate(T,string templateVar = "T", string pre =
"")(string var){
string res = "final switch(" ~ var ~ "){";
foreach(m;__trai
On Sunday, 9 December 2012 at 19:34:05 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Sunday, 9 December 2012 at 19:24:24 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
In this particular case you can do this:
mixin template GenStruct(string stringname)
{
struct S
{
}
mixin("alias S " ~ stringname ~ "alpha;");
}
But w
On Sunday, 9 December 2012 at 19:24:24 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
In this particular case you can do this:
mixin template GenStruct(string stringname)
{
struct S
{
}
mixin("alias S " ~ stringname ~ "alpha;");
}
But what if I use more than one mixin? I'll have multiple
str
On Sunday, 9 December 2012 at 19:09:49 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Sunday, 9 December 2012 at 10:42:40 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
How can I create mixes of stringified code and code itself?
[...]
mixin template GenStruct(stringname)
{
struct stringname ~ "alpha"
{
}
}
mixin Ge
On Sunday, 9 December 2012 at 10:42:40 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
How can I create mixes of stringified code and code itself?
[...]
mixin template GenStruct(stringname)
{
struct stringname ~ "alpha"
{
}
}
mixin GenStruct!("Helpme");
would be equivalent to do the followi
On Sunday, 9 December 2012 at 11:25:25 UTC, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
You can use a templated string-returning function and mix it in:
string codeGenerator(compileTimeArguments, Other...)(Other
others)
{
string result = ...
(...) // build your code here
return result;
}
(...)
cla
On Sunday, 9 December 2012 at 10:42:40 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
How can I create mixes of stringified code and code itself?
http://dlang.org/mixin.html
explains how to create structs using strings. But what if I do
not want to have to encode the whole struct as a string but
only parts of it?
mi
42 matches
Mail list logo
