--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just who are these Luddites you're so fond of attacking, Howard?
Finally, an chance to use the information from those seemingly
useless history classes I endured while frowning up in the UK.
Andy K3UK
From
Thanks for the historical perspective.. I am fortunate enough to have studied
English History many years ago where I learned the term... Luddites are those
who distrusts or fears the inevitable changes brought about by new
technology and in the end the Luddite Movement ceased to be active
Could we not use highly inflammatory comments such as calling other hams
Luddites? There are NO luddite hams that I have found. There can be
differing viewpoints on what types of operation have value to a given
individual.
Remember that the luddite term referred to people who were employed in
That's two messages in a row inveighing against modern-day Luddites
holding back bandwidth-based allocation without citation of anyone
actually taking this position.
Perhaps this is another example of If you hold a weak position,
attack an imaginary enemy.
The true obstacle to bandwidth-based
I use my KAM frequently; WinWarbler lets me run MMTTY and the KAM
simultaneously, providing diversity decoding of one signal, or the
ability to copy both a DX station and his/her pileup.
I also have a PK232 and an STSII-e; I use the latter for Pactor, and
(rarely and somewhat perversely) PSK31.
Dave,
The ability of the software that you requested has arrived. SCAMP will
DEFINITELY not TX if the channel is busy with anything!
Sometimes it almost seems too protective:) Since it is a wide BW mode, a
tiny and weak CW signal, which just happens to be about two KC above the
dial freq, has
I already have my BPL buster up and running right now.
It's called a 10-meter beacon! You will only need a
Tech plus license at a minimum and no coronation
requirements to put up a low power slow speed CW
signal with a basic dipole antenna, a very cheap AM CB
radio, and some way to key the PTT
I have several TNC's and oh no, several terminal units
as well. I also have a sound card setup in the mix of
digital equipment. You can't do ARQ modes with a sound
card except for HFTerm which required Linux and as it
locks the OS from running any other programs you might
as well run Terman93
When was the last time you used that sound card and had a
ARQ Amtor or a Pactor ARQ QSO ? You can't do that with a
sound card.
I have been playing with a linux program but even it's only about
42% of the 100% of the TNC..
BOTTOM LINE:
your sound card just can't cut it.
And when using my ST-6 TU
I have moved the cluster software to a faster, more reliable, PC on
my network. That was no small accomplishment since the Cluster
software was not friendly to a simple transfer. I need a few tests,
I am not sure it is working correctly because I can't connect
myself. While I am working
Andy,
Tried twice, just a blank screen here.
Does not ask for my call or any input.
Jerry K0HZI
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
a href=http://dxcluster.blogspot.com;img
src=http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif; height=67 width=200
How to Design BPL-Buster Communications
By careful analysis of interfering signals, a communications system
can be designed to optimally operate in the presence of BPL
interference. Yes... there are limitations, but with repetetive or
multi-carrier signals such as some of the BPL signals we
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy,
Tried twice, just a blank screen here.
Does not ask for my call or any input.
Jerry K0HZI
Thanks Jerry, give unti around 0200 UTC, I need to add a few more
files
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT
One of the interesting upgrades out, is for the HK-232 / PK-232 series of
TNC's. Not only does the HK / PK232 series of TNC have excellent passive hf
filters, now they are further improved with cascaded DSP filters.
The ability to take the load off of the CPU is a great reason to use a TNC.
Even when I used the TNCs , I didnt used AMTOR or PACTOR. So, havent lost
anything there. I seem to be able to copy many more signals now, than when
I was using them too, mainly becuase there are many more signals there. The
sound card programs have opened up the world of digital to most hams,
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, obrienaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--Not me...
- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyone else getting the below, everyltime you try to send to the
group?
He needs to be removed, if that is the case.
At 09:27 PM 2/20/05, you wrote:
OK, I have got myself connected, please give it a try.
I had to change the forwarded ports on my DSL router.
OK Andy it works
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
a href=http://dxcluster.blogspot.com;img
i COULDN'T LOGIN EARLIER. But is ok now.
- Original Message -
From: John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 01:14
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Need cluster testers again
get... can't open connection to 208.15.25.196
At
18 matches
Mail list logo