I think Olivia at slower rates with 250Hz or 500Hz will be useful for
APRS-like message exchange, to use in place of email or cell phones for
setting up skeds, self-spotting, etc. The slow rate will ensure it is
not used wantonly, but the ability to puch through 7100 AM QRM will
help.
On Mon,
Quoting Paul L Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
"Why do gentlemen's agreements work on 160 meters but nowhere else?
Does anyone remember back a few years when we all had to look at
the cheat-sheet to see which segments of 160 we could use for
ANYTHING, then see how much power we could have in that se
I also have been a BBS SYSOP since 1983
First running on a 64k radio shack system
and later the MSYS...
Sorry if I got you all up-set man
At 04:46 PM 4/5/05, you wrote:
>I was first licensed in 1952, and have been an alternate sysop on a packet
>BBS, Thank you. Your rash assumptions may b
I was first licensed in 1952, and have been an alternate sysop on a packet
BBS, Thank you. Your rash assumptions may bite you in the*** someday.
There was one very great difference in the "Unattended Packet" stations and
the current digital conflicts.- They operated on very well defined
freque
I take it you ham been a ham for 10 years or less ?
Or just don't remember per internet and all those
packet system all running unattended.. Then came
pactor as to what is in now.
John, WØJAB
At 01:01 PM 4/5/05, you wrote:
>I think this opinion is false-to-fact. IMO, most Hams want direct,
>
I think this opinion is false-to-fact. IMO, most Hams want direct,
person-to-person communication, not anonymous relaying of other peoples text.
That is the foundation of Ham radio. ANY automated , personless passing on
of text is sterile and fit for the Internet, but not Ham radio, except for
I think that one of the reasons there's so much contention over
Winlink is that it DOES work as well as it does... IMO, the ability
to pass e-mail back to _the Internet_ is what people want, and while
PSK31, Olivia, and all the other 'chat mode' protocols and even
packet BBSes are a lot of fu
Message: 19
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:39:06 -0500
From: "Rick Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Winlink take over?
Skip,
With all due respect, (and you have considerable), it seems that some of the
arguments may be counter productive and may in some cases affect the
survival of amateu
They both "use" SSB transmissions, and it's quite true that SSTV is not
data -- SSTV is "image", and the U.S. phone bands are designated
"voice/image" and "data". It is still illegal in the U.S. to be on a
voice frequency and say "OK, Bob, Here's the data you need: [multi-
tone beeps for 20 secon
Hi Danny,
Under serious emergencies involving the safety of life or property you can
theoretically do certain things that you can not legally do under normal
circumstances. (If you have had the ARRL Emcomm class you know that there
can be some limitations so good judgement needs to be used.
One
10 matches
Mail list logo
