John,
It may
be that you have not been keeping up with the changing technology. Those of us
who did beta testing on the new SCAMP mode in Winlink 2000 were very impressed
with the ARQ ability and the throughput. The only problem has been that the
selection of protocols (RDFT) which is al
I have long been a champion of splitting the front and back ends and
using a network protocol to connect them. Then the GUI can be
best-of-breed and be done by people who specialize in that, without
regard for the backend. As it is now, every digimode program has its
own UI.
I created a prot
Good day to all,
I figured it's time I posted this. Since October of last year, I've
become the new custodian so to speak for the JNOS software. The URL
for this software is as follows :
http://www.langelaar.net/projects/jnos2
JNOS is a somewhat monolithic application for amateur radio digita
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am not a programmer, but what about the new direction so many
are taking
> with MONO?
Mono aims to allow 'generic' Microsoft (or other) .Net software to
run under Linux. This is akin to writing, say, a C compil
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:54 +0200, Nino Porcino (IZ8BLY) wrote:
Hi Nino,
as you say, most of the code will be OS specific... dont worry about
cleaning it up. The important stuff is the code that takes text and
builds the audio stream and the reverse process.
Let the individual developers worry ab
Your dreaming
There is a reason there are no AMTOR, PACTOR sound card
ARQ programs. They just CAN'T keep up with the TNC (hardware)
systems.
I have run lots of test and at best a linux system was just 47%
of a TNC running side by side.
At 07:40 PM 9/26/05, you wrote in part:
>
>In my view, wh
Pactor
(meaning Pactor I) was a pretty good system for its time. I have heard that P2
and P3 are even better for weaker signals. However, they do not appear to be
able to do that well under difficult conditions. Remember that the slowest the
pactor modes go is 100 baud and that is way too
Just been reading Ed Woodrich`s post 11432, Keyboard to Keyboard.
The most powerful word when selling and marketing any product placed
before the buying public is NEW. That`s why every packet of Wizzo,
Grot-nuts, or Zed-Lite, when they are first promoted, or re-launched,
have a big NEW on the f
Hello Nino,
>would also make it available for other programs
I think the most only important thing is to have very precise specifications
(and the paper you do is very clear but I have some questions).
The code is not indispensable except if details can only be found in the
program (as set of ch
