Assuming that spam filtering is automatically based on content
is very naive; accusing someone of trying to restrict what you read
based on that assumption is silly.
I run my own mail server that has one of the most restrictive mail
filters on the planet, and not one iota of the filters is
On 10/6/05, John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good points Harv.
But I fail to see why anyone would use such an address
as their primary email address.
Matter of personal choice ... I have other addresses I use for other purposes.
My ISP (sitting across the room from me) is set
Rick,
I've only had a few QSO's with Chip, but I think it
will find a niche. One major
obstacle is the polar ionosphere and
Chip seeems to do as well as MFSK and Olivia in
that respect.
Chip128 is especially good through Moe
Wheatley's canned simulation for high-latitude conditions,
Good points Harv.
But I fail to see why anyone would use such an address
as their primary email address.
My ISP (sitting across the room from me) is set up in such
a way that if I alter my return address in any way from what it is
the ISP will kick it right back to me without sending it out.
Th
You can use data up to 3.750 on 80 meters, at
least here in the states.
- Original Message -
From:
Leigh L Klotz,
Jr.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 5:40
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] olivia/chirp
beacon
How about
Hi Andy
Below, a copy of an Email I sent to Barry J. Shelley, N1VXY,
Chief Financial Officer and Business Manager, ARRL, Inc. on September 1
... just a day or
two after they announced their new "service". Seems my
apprehension was well grounded.
Harv
===
My note to B
Maybe you stirred up the nest, Rich. The W6RK site has spots now from
several stations dated 10/04/05. But not much activity for awhile
before today. Maybe we're doing more listening than posting..?
73's All
Steve KE8PA
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
We have found that some of the people that use email addresses supplied by
the ARRL, e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] , ( an email forwarding service) are not
getting some messages. Seems that the ARRL new anti-spam program is tagging
a lot of things a spam when in fact it's not. Those of you that use
Could
some one explain the advantage of CHIP 64 over other modes? Thus far I have
found, along with others that have worked with the mode, nothing to
differentiate it. It does not work as well as MFSK16 on difficult/noisy paths
such as nighttime 80 meters. Are there cases where it does pe
- Original Message -
From: Stan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 5:14 PM
Subject: [chip64] Hw about a Chip Weekend
I would like to proposed a Chip64 weekend. It
would give us a chance to try out the software and meet each other.I
would like to suggest Oc
How about the upper end of 80m? It is a wasteland jsust waiting to be
used. There is plenty of it even if you avoid 3675-3735 in case a Tech
wants to get on CW.
> somewhere around 1804/3582/7089 would
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to
a non legal thought
its not gonna be much of a mode test, if you are on a dead band...6/10
if you are in attendance, then why not just call cq a bunch. text: cq cq
cq (mode) test transmission. please qrx or send e-mail to
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
AR
don't think this will break any laws, and yo
Hello Nino,
I use your Stream V.1.1 program, which is nice.
Because the MFSK16 mode in general is not always easy to tune, I think it
would help stations receiving me if my Idle Tone at the beginning of each
transmission was a bit longer than the 1 second default. Perhaps two or
three seconds lo
13 matches
Mail list logo
