Howard my point was that one need not spend $1K
to get on pactor unless they are looking to get on
II or III.
I have no activity with WL2K other then I do copy
some of the traffic.
At this time I have the PK-232 on a FT-840 parked on
7075.
The PTC is on the FT-847.
2nd FT-847 is used for
Would anyone know if it's possible to use less than 16 bit sampling
and still be able to decode digital modes such as RTTY and PSK?
I don't mean the sample rate, such as 11025 used in MixW, I mean the
digital sampling of the actual audio.
the less bits you use, the more the quantization
While the Pactor 2 and 3 modes are preferred for use with Winlink 2000,
this is to reduce transmission time on the HF link. Since you are held
to a time limit of 30 minutes per 24 hour period, the use of the Pactor
1 mode may not be enough time for what you want to send. In fact, some
of
Hi John.
Thanks, Sir. I understand where you were coming from now. I'm
a bit sensitive about the WL2K EMCOMM project I guess. I have
seen one line of thought which held that if the system was a
little out of reach of the average ham, the system would not
be bogged down by
If Linux became more popular, it might be possible to see more PSKmail
connections that use ARQ PSK63, but I don't see that happening any time
soon. Even though very slow, it is dramatically narrower than the Pactor
modes and would cause much less interference to other hams.
73, Rick,
Looks like DominoEX has been added to gMSK according to a few posts
that I saw yesterday.
--
Andy K3UK
Fredonia, New York.
Skype Me : callto://andyobrien73
Also available via Echolink
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW
Had a nice QSO with AB6MB in Antioch, CA this evening. PSK31 right about 10,141.20.Don't hear much activity on 30.Of course we were bombarded by one of the automatic QRM machines, but worked through it.Not sure if it was Pactor I, II, or III. Could have been IV or V for all I care.
Lots of
