Sorry Andy, that doesn't work either! I've extended the cell halfway
across the screen, and it just refuses to work! I think I'll have to
manually alter the date on the first entry of each operating
session, and then do a fill down for the others.
John
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
Ed WB6YTE wrote:
I installed and attempted to setup PCALE yesterday but
encountered a few problems.
I did not find my radio (TS-2000) in the MIL-STD-188-141 menu.
Is this program limited to the radios listed?
There is only one com port selection for radio control. Can
separate
There was a live demo, backpack-to-backpack, of AOR DV on 40 meters at
the Pacificon HFpack forum today. It sounded superb, better than a
full-quieting FM repeater! Everyone was very impressed.
Bonnie KQ6XA
Paul Metzger KQ6EH wrote:
Here is one I had recorded myself directly into my computer
The answers to these questions about what is an image is simple in one
respect. The current FCC rules allow digital emissions throughout
the 160 through 10 meter bands. This is true because emissions that
have a 1 or a 2 as the second symbol of the emissions designator are
allowed everywhere.
These FCC rules are very poorly drawn. I can send every signal digital
file transfer in the phone band with a single bit per second of an image
as that makes it an image transfer. I do this by attaching an
icon/avatar to each transmission. I then get 3 kHz to do my file
transfers. To avoid
Darn, I missed Ken,
I was on 40m yesterday giving Mark (K6MJD) his very first AOR DV
contact. During that QSO, as we switched back to analog, there was a
station out in Las Vegas that asked us if we were using the AOR Digital
Voice modems. He added that he had been looking into them
Anyone here using a real time site to set up skeds? I have had mixed
results looking for a QSO on a particular mode by posting here.
There is of course http://dxworld.com/ddx.html but it isn't getting a
whole lot of use. A sked page is sorely needed so we can do these
modes some justice.
QRV
Hi,
I decided to spring the $13 IEEE wanted for the article. It seems a bit
much, but the 'Watterson Model' is referenced frequently and I should
probably understand it. I also probably should have gone down to the
local university library and copied the 12 pages there. For those that
are
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone here using a real time site to set up skeds? I have had mixed
results looking for a QSO on a particular mode by posting here.
There is of course http://dxworld.com/ddx.html but it isn't getting a
whole lot of use. A
This should read Data emissions in the Phone/Image bands.
73,
N5RFX
At 10:46 AM 10/15/2006, N5RFXwrote:
Allowing Data emissions in the RTTY/Phone bands.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector :
I asked MelK0PFX about WinDRM versus AOR since he is very experienced
with both. His answer was...
AOR is little more robust, but not much
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector :
I'm not much of a fan of trading pictures over the airways but since I
have become familiar with how to operate WinDRM I have also taken the
time to explore Hampal and DIGTRX. Hampal and DIGTRX look to me to be
exactly what software should look like for emergency communication of
messages. I
Bill,
Part 2 of the FCC rules section 2.1 has definitions. Look at the link below.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/get-cfr.cgi?TITLE=47PART=2SECTION=1YEAR=2000TYPE=TEXT
I was not quoting; thus the absence of quotation marks, but you can
see the definitions of Telegraphy and Facsimile
Mark,
I do appreciate your incremental success in at least getting image
(albeit in a very narrow 500 Hz BW) in the HF data area. There will be a
few cases where this might be nice to have such as small images,
diagrams, or maybe even something new that we have not thought of and
since now
I agree, and the FCC is accepting petitions.
73,
Mark N5RFX
But I really do believe that we need to be able to move data on the
phone frequencies.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector :
Andy,
I too have come to realize that WinDRM, or something similar, could play
a role in emergency and traffic handling data. Because this stuff tends
to be a bit complicated, the ideal situation would be to use phone to
coordinate the program and then send the data through. With the BSR
But Bonnie, no one is asking that 500 HZ be the maximum in use. They are
simply saying that it should be the maximum in certain portions of the band
plan. Other portions of the bands will still be available for 3 or more KC
bandwidths. It is just hopeful that we can scatter thus stuff out to
Harv,
Just because they are not immediately available, doesn't mean that they
won't become available when they increase the mass production. They
actually believe that the price can go down with more numbers.
We may have to pay a bit more, but then again, very few in the developed
world would
Hi Rick and others,
I noticed something peculiar about this recent FCC RO: they are
talking about Voice instead of Phone. Previously, the only
definition for subbands was phone. The only ham band having a
Voice rule that I know of is the 5MHz channels. The rest of the
bands are Phone. In
Danny Douglas N7DC wrote:
But Bonnie, no one is asking that 500 HZ be the maximum in use.
Hi Danny,
Actually, many organisations are asking for limitations of 500Hz or
200Hz in large chunks of the bands.
See the recent proposal for rulemaking by ARRL, which is currently
being considered
I know some have asked for chunks that way, but at the same time for chunks
with larger signal bandwidth. What I am concerned about is some 3 kc signal
getting on top of us when we are using cw or psk or some other narrower
signal, and wiping us out. Already happens with RTTY , contesia, etc.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
As for the supposed loss or disappearance of the automatic band at
3620kHz to 3635kHz, I do not believe this FCC error should be allowed
to stand for very long.
Perhaps the FCC's interim correction to the
Bonnie has a good point!
The ARRL HSMM Working Group recommended at least the same bandwidth for HF
digital research and advancement as the current ARRL bandplan recommended
for a old legacy mode such as AM. The recommendation was obviously
rejected.
John - K8OCL
From: expeditionradio
Traditional analog techniques for bandwidth use in our ham bands
have been based upon loose cooperation (some say non-cooperation)
through separating QSOs by frequency. This frequency-centric
model has driven the bandplans. But a new paradigm is now unfolding,
with the use of time-sharing
24 matches
Mail list logo
