On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:52:37 -0500
Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you say, everyone is a bit different as to where their waterfall
pointer lies on a digital signal. It is much better to just spot
the actual freq where the audio signal comes out on the waterfall.
I.E. 14.0731.
John GM4SLV wrote:
I agree that the actual QRG should be the one reported - but
AFAICT we'll still need to do our own maths to put the required
RF frequency into the right area of baseband on the waterfall.
BTW I find most Olivia sigs in Europe around 14106.5 or 14107.5
(centre)...with
If it had just been for willful interference, I would agree, but the
undertone of not following the bandplan was pretty alarming to me.
Anyone can claim interference if you have voice modes in a CW area since
you can not filter out a wide mode that has frequencies spread out and
that will
I have been running psk-31 on 20 meters for a week or so and been having a
lot of fun with the mode. I looked around the other bands,17,15,12 and 10 and
6 found nothing at all. Used the frequencies as indicated on the various
psk web sites. At the time I was looking,all of the bands were
Have a look at this site:
http://www.hotamateurprograms.com/downloads.htm
73 Ted G0TED
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the non-paid version of Multipsk you only have 5 minutes to
test
the enhanced CW mode. I admit that I did not try a very
