Re: [digitalradio] Re: 141A

2007-05-11 Thread John Bradley
Saw your print , but unfortunately the operator goofed first time , I might add John VE5MU - Original Message - From: expeditionradio To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 7:40 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: 141A --- In digitalradio

[digitalradio] 10145.5 - Testing Multipsk -141

2007-05-11 Thread expeditionradio
I'm testing Multipsk -141 ARQ now on 10145.5 USB. Bonnie KQ6XA

Re: [digitalradio] Newbie

2007-05-11 Thread Tony
>New to the group >Mike, KD5ZXX Welcome Mike... Tony KT2Q - Original Message - From: "kd5zxx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 8:36 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Newbie > > >

Re: [digitalradio] Newbie

2007-05-11 Thread ny2u
In a message dated 5/11/2007 8:37:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: New to the group and ham radio in general. Looking forward to trying some of the digital modes. 73's Mike, KD5ZXX Howdy Mike, KD5ZXX: I'd like to Welcome you to the Digital Modes and this very fi

[digitalradio] Re: 141A

2007-05-11 Thread expeditionradio
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I tried making a connect recently but did not hear anything back so > assumed there was no propagation. I will try again later on tonight. Hi Rick, Try an HFL net call on 14109.5 USB or 7102.0 USB. That would be more likely to ge

[digitalradio] Newbie

2007-05-11 Thread kd5zxx
New to the group and ham radio in general. Looking forward to trying some of the digital modes. 73's Mike, KD5ZXX

[digitalradio] 100 baud FSK SELCALL CCIR 493-4 Australian Selcall

2007-05-11 Thread expeditionradio
Hi Patrick, The ending Zero [0] is used for group call addressing. Examples: 3000 is All Call for addresses 3001-3999 3300 is a Group Call for addresses 3301-3399 3310 is a Sub-Group call for addresses 3311-3319 Hams register selcall addresses with voluntary coordination in the HFLINK database. I

Re: [digitalradio] 141A

2007-05-11 Thread mrfarm
I tried making a connect recently but did not hear anything back so assumed there was no propagation. I will try again later on tonight. When I ran my tests with the "local" station on 160 meters, the mode did not perform well at all compared to other modes. If you look at Patrick, F6CTE's sens

Re: [digitalradio] 100 baud FSK SELCALL Re: RTTY Configurations

2007-05-11 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Bonnie, TKS for information. I did not find the CCIR 493-4 but I have found the Hflink Selcall list, Here is an example: SELCALL ADDRESS CALLSIGN NAME COMMENT 3300 GROUPCALL NORTH AMERICA CALLSIGN AREAS= 6/7. Moreover each equipment has its all Selcall. So a Ham can have one or se

[digitalradio] 100 baud FSK SELCALL Re: RTTY Configurations

2007-05-11 Thread expeditionradio
Hi Patrick, The marine Digital Selective Calling is GMDSS (ITU-R M.493-9 to M.493-11) DSC. Hams are using the "Australian" Selcall (CCIR 493-4), an older version of this standard, with addresses limited to 4 numeric characters. This standard is used by Codan, Barrett, QMAC, Vertex, Icom, etc. It

Re: [digitalradio] 100 baud FSK SELCALL Re: RTTY Configurations

2007-05-11 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Bonnie, Do you mean that it is the same system as GMDSS DSC used for digital selective calling system for use in the maritime mobile service? (ITU-R M.493-11 recommendation) 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: expeditionradio To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent:

[digitalradio] 141A

2007-05-11 Thread John Bradley
Rick (KV9U) ...saw you on my screen on 7040.5... if you have the latest version (4.3) of multipsk, you can enter a messgae on the xux screen ARQ FAE, and with my call in the addresse box, hit send and you should connect. I can retrieve the mail later. What's cool about this is gradually red

[digitalradio] 100 baud FSK SELCALL Re: RTTY Configurations

2007-05-11 Thread expeditionradio
> Does anyone run 100wpm ASCII RTY anymore? There is increasing use of 100 baud FSK SELCALL in ham radio. This is HF SELCALL CCIR 493-4 (Australian Selcall). HFLINK maintains a database listing of operators using it: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hflink/database It is similar to Marine DSC

[digitalradio] Need help with Logger 32

2007-05-11 Thread amateurw7vp
I have used Logger 32 for a long time. I recently upgraded it in order to use the digital modes directly and permit direct logging in my general log. I am using an MFJ 1279 which works well with MMTTY, Digipan and N1MM. However I can't seem to get the audio level up when using Logger 32 in t

Re: [digitalradio] 6m psk31

2007-05-11 Thread Joe Veldhuis
50.290. I've been calling on and off all week and have yet to make a QSO. -Joe, N8FQ On Fri, 11 May 2007 14:04:34 -0500 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guys & Gals, > > What would be the 6m psk31 frequency in the US? > > Thanks--- > Bob C. (WU9Q)

[digitalradio] 6m psk31

2007-05-11 Thread Chris
Guys & Gals, What would be the 6m psk31 frequency in the US? Thanks--- Bob C. (WU9Q)

[digitalradio] 110 baud ASCII vs. other modes

2007-05-11 Thread mrfarm
Philip Leonard WVØT wrote: > Does anyone run 100wpm ASCII RTY anymore. The story of ASCII operation on HF is interesting because it was one of those issues where there was a strong desire by some hams to have this capability back when we could only use 5 level code such as RTTY. If we could run

Re: [digitalradio] Apologies in Order? 20m PSK

2007-05-11 Thread ny2u
In a message dated 5/11/2007 1:02:53 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was operating PSK31 on 20m this morning and made 3 or 4 qso's. Apparently, I was badly splattering and if so, want to apologize to the other operators I may have qrm'd. That is not the way I was

[digitalradio] Apologies in Order? 20m PSK

2007-05-11 Thread Larry Cobb
I was operating PSK31 on 20m this morning and made 3 or 4 qso's. Apparently, I was badly splattering and if so, want to apologize to the other operators I may have qrm'd. That is not the way I was brought up :-[ I'm not sure what the problem is because I got good signal reports from 2 station

Re: [digitalradio] Re: RTTY Configurations

2007-05-11 Thread Philip Leonard WVØT
jhaynesatalumni wrote: > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> What are the common RTTY configurations? I ask because I am in the > middle of porting / rewriting the fldigi RTTY code but have never used > RTTY myself. I'm thinking about combinations of b

[digitalradio] Re: RTTY Configurations

2007-05-11 Thread jhaynesatalumni
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What are the common RTTY configurations? I ask because I am in the middle of porting / rewriting the fldigi RTTY code but have never used RTTY myself. I'm thinking about combinations of baud / shift / bits / . > > Si

[digitalradio] K3UK digital schedule for Mid-Atlantic QSO Party

2007-05-11 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I will be active from Chautauqua County New York in this weekend's Mid Atlantic QSO Party. In addition to hunting for QSO on CW and SSB phone, I will be active on the following digital modes at the following times. Saturday May 12, all times UTC. TimeApproximate frequency Mod

Re: [digitalradio] Re: RFSM2400 in ZL

2007-05-11 Thread Dave Ingram
expeditionradio wrote: > The HFLINK organisation corresponded with WIA bandplanners during the > planning of the new Australian bandplan in 2006. As a result, there > are several frequencies on 40m and 80m that were coordinated in the > new Australian bandplan (and IARU Region 3) for ALE -141 and 1

[digitalradio] Re: RFSM2400 in ZL

2007-05-11 Thread expeditionradio
Hi Les, The HFLINK organisation corresponded with WIA bandplanners during the planning of the new Australian bandplan in 2006. As a result, there are several frequencies on 40m and 80m that were coordinated in the new Australian bandplan (and IARU Region 3) for ALE -141 and 188-110 (RFSM2400) acti