FCC Denies Two Amateur Radio Petitions for Rulemaking
In two separate decisions released today, the Federal Communications Commission
denied two Petitions for Rulemaking (PRM) having to do with Amateur Radio.
These two PRMs, one filed by Mark Miller, N5RFX, of Arlington, Texas,
concerning
I am trying to use the host serial console functionality to control a
repeater controller from a X-1J4 TheNet digipeater. The issue I'm
running into is the fact that the digipeater appears to repeatedly be
sending a string to the repeater controller that the repeater
controller interprets as
Mark N5RFX wrote:
I am disappointed that the FCC did not elaborate on the
purpose of Section 97.307(f) which limits specified
RTTY or data emissions to a symbol rate not to
exceed 300 bauds...
Why is that there?
The FCC has spoken and the status quo prevails.
Hi Mark,
This FCC order
bruce wa4gch wrote:
So does this meen we can junk 99% of all ham stations
for your idea of what ham radio should be?
Ha ha, Bruce! Good one.
Seriously, though, this is more of a rejection of
backward-thinking attempts to stifle USA hams' future
while the rest of the world passes us by.
- Forwarded Message
From: Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2008 10:21:30 AM
Subject: [illinoisdigitalham] GO-32 9.6k APRS Sked May 17, ~8:30pm EDT
I'm putting together a little sked for APRS operations on GO-32.
I've been listening, and there doesn't
To those of us residing in places outside of the USA, meaning the rest
of the world, in plain English, what does all this rejection of the
petition mean ? May I hazard a guess and suggest that when the radio
conditions improve and communications around the world resume to a
reasonable
If it had become law in the US the rest of the world would
be operation on modes that us in the USA can no longer
operate. We would be kicked back to the stone age.
That's it in a few words.
At 03:25 PM 5/8/2008, you wrote:
To those of us residing in places outside of the USA, meaning the rest
Mark, Is there a program that I can use to decode GO-32 downlink my radion is a
IC-706MKII2 and using HRD to track the bird.
Thanks Russell NC5O
=
IN GOD WE TRUST !
=
Russell Blair NC5O
Skype-Russell Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
--- On Thu, 5/8/08,
http://evokefrank.googlepages.com/oddsound_1.824.0_1000UTC.wmv
f
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bruce wa4gch wrote:
So does this meen we can junk 99% of all ham stations
for your idea of what ham radio should be?
Ha ha, Bruce! Good one.
Seriously, though, this is more of a rejection of
And if this became law we in the USA would be sitting
back watching while the rest of the world operated the modes
that we now could not.
Bonnie makes a very good point when she say we would
be back in the stone age.
John, W0JAB
At 10:05 PM 5/8/2008, John WB4NNY wrote:
Bruce makes a serious
Hello Bonnie,
I was wondering if you could bring me ( others in the group) up-to-date
with your MIL 188-141A ALE experiments? specifically I would be be
interested in knowing how most messages are passed? are they AMD/DBM or
DTM? The only ALE signals I have heard recently (at least on 30m)
12 matches
Mail list logo
