What software and/or hardware did you use? I've used both MMTTY and
MixW. It seems much easier to tune with MixW since you can see much
more of the band and any signals present.
Tim, N9PUZ
Currently I'm using a KAM connected to the PKT jack on my FT-1000MP Mk.V
and the
Here is confirmation that conditions are as bad as we thought.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/30sep_blankyear.htm
Darrel
Howdy Folks:
I've been reading some great news on guys/gals getting together and forming
some teams for the upcoming TARA PSK Rumble this coming weekend and that is
so awesome! I thought I had better post this information so you all know
there is some time limitations with your
I recall that when the FCC first authorized the use of ASCII code for
RTTY in addition to Baudot in 1980, the ham radio press made it appear
that this was a really big deal.
I've Googled information on ASCII RTTY, and find no indication that is
being used to any significant extent. ARRL states
It seems not so robust and more prone to errors. It requires the correct
decoding of 7 bits vs 5 bits on Baudot.
I read the same in old QST's.
Jose, CO2JA
John Becker escribió:
I recall that when the FCC first authorized the use of ASCII code for
RTTY in addition to Baudot in 1980, the
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why did ASCII fail to catch on? Just curious!
73,
John, K9MM
Hi John,
Probably because ASCII requires separate equipment. The standard TTY
would not do ASCII and the home computers of 1980 would were a little
too
John,
I first got on RTTY in 1981, and had a Robot 800 keyboard. tI would send
and recv ASCII.
It was fast, but it was more difficult to tune that Baudot, and it was quite
error-prone.
I always loved the Clover mode, but it did not catch on either.
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message
In about 1979 I had a DGM electronic keyboard and display setup. It
also sent and received ASCII besides decoding RTTY and CW. Software
programs were transmitted on the ham bands and I remember receiving
many of them letter perfect. There was even a British Broadcast
station that sent ASCII
--- On Wed, 10/1/08, hankvond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: hankvond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ASCII ?
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008, 8:30 PM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why did
W4PC
QRZ Member
CSS releases EmComm Ops!
EmComm Ops Radio Software Now Available
Creative Services Software Releases New Addition to
Its Radio Operations Center Software Suite for Packet Radio
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Muscle Shoals, AL, September 30,
Hi John,
I was just getting relicensed about the time that ASCII was approved for
ham radio as a major breakthrough for advanced technology. I asked one
of my long time digital friends to explain what this meant. He said that
after a very short time, it was quickly realized that 110 baud ASCII
Rick
I agree about your ASCII comment but as far as RTTY goes, just
about anyone can copy it with machine (as I still do) or by computer.
Did you ever notice that the ARRL bulletins still to this day put a
CR/LF at the end of a 70 letter line. Still a lot of machines out
there still working after
There are those of us who do not wish to be bombarded by Fred's muck
mire, especially in the body of an e-mail. Beyond that, you know as
do all of us that posting a copy of a thread from another forum is a
huge no-no due to copyright infringement.
--- On Wed, 10/1/08, Mark Thompson [EMAIL
-
Is my brain dead? I may be missing the point of this product, I read
the manual and it says PSK31 is a new mode and it references 20 year
old concepts . Seems like a step backwards to me.
Andy
I am drumming up a team for my local contest club.
Andy k3UK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy Folks:
I've been reading some great news on guys/gals getting together and
forming
some teams for the upcoming TARA PSK Rumble this coming weekend
and that
Hello Andy, K3UK:
We appreciate you getting a team going on your end. Let us know if we can be
of any service to you or your team
73 de Bill NY2U
In a message dated 10/1/2008 10:09:48 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am drumming up a team for my local contest
The Allegheny Valley Radio Association is a cyber radio club with an
emphasis on contesting. If you live within a 175 mile radius of
Gobbler's Knob, PA, you are eligible to join (it is free!) Check the
map of the 175 mile radius at http://www.obriensweb.com/avramap.jpg
The area covers most of PA,
I guess some people thought it was a Big Deal, but there were lots
of reasons why it didn't go anywhere.
I'd say the overriding one is that with 60 wpm Baudot RTTY the bit
length is 22 milliseconds. With 100 wpm ASCII 110 baud the bit
length is 9 milliseconds. That means 2.4 times the
--- On Wed, 10/1/08, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ASCII ?
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008, 9:56 PM
Rick
I agree about your ASCII comment but as far as RTTY goes,
just
Time warp?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 10:05 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: CSS releases EmComm Ops Radio Software
I won't repeat it here, but I did provide a comment after the press
release on this product on eham. This product is probably at least 10
years too late. We have free products that will greatly outperform
packet modes with much lower signal to noise using a sound card and a
simple low cost
North American RTTY Sprint, 10/12, Z - 0400Z
http://www.ncjweb.com/sprintrules.php
22 matches
Mail list logo
