There is a Yahoo group, though it's been quiet for almost a year now:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chip64
I believe this is Nino's web site, along with his contact information:
http://xoomer.alice.it/aporcino/Chip64/index.htm
Later,
Artie
KC2MFS
>I'm looking for more technical details
I know of at least three local technician class hams (including myself)
that are looking forward to learning CW *after* getting our general.
Requiring Morse to get the general stopped us from even trying in the
past. How can you learn without practice? Especially in today's hectic
world.
Furt
Hi,
I decided to spring the $13 IEEE wanted for the article. It seems a bit
much, but the 'Watterson Model' is referenced frequently and I should
probably understand it. I also probably should have gone down to the
local university library and copied the 12 pages there. For those that
are inte
>>The FCC regulation on technical descriptions, ยง 97.309(a)(4), reads:
>>
>>(4) An amateur station transmitting a RTTY or data emission using a
>>digital code specified in this paragraph may use any technique whose
>>technical characteristics have been documented publicly, such as
>>
Are you referring to this?
http://hamshack-hack.sourceforge.net/
Later,
Artie Lekstutis
KC2MFS
>Please excuse the Linux rookie questions. I wonder if there is an
>easy to manage CD bootable Linux program that one could download for a
>CD burn? Sometime ago a member here (Harv, I think) wa
Hi,
I've been an engineer for a long time, but I'm new to ham radio. Where
exactly is this limitation defined by the FCC in the US? What document
(and maybe section) defines the limitation of 300 baud regardless of the
bandwidth?
Also: are you saying that the FCC allows us to transmit multiple
That depends entirely on the modulation method. At 8 bits per symbol,
that could be as low as 375hz. Eight bits per symbol is very sensitive
to noise though, and probably isn't interesting to this group. PSK31
sends one bit per Hz bandwidth and is much more robust on HF, and is
probably a bette
There are voice encoding schemes that require much less. I've
experimented with this codec (for example), and found it quite good even
at 3k bits per second:
http://www.hawksoft.com/hawkvoice/
It's not lossless mind you, but quite intelegible and almost natural
sounding.
Artie Lekstutis
KC
