purpose if useful here.
73, doc kd4e
Respectfully, you might want to clue your EOC in on the SEDAN network and how
it works. Those folks have a lot of experience with tactical emcomm using
packet.
What impressed me the most is that they have known for a long time that
forwarded messages, e.g
hardware at one end or both?
Given the history of hype one is required to be
cynical.
IMHO, YMMV ... 73, doc kd4e
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http
It would make FCC-mandated self-policing possible.
Right now it is impossible.
QRM is not the only challenge, improper and/or
illegal use of Ham spectrum is also a legitimate
concern.
John Becker wrote:
This would be a unjust burden.
In no way would it reduce QRM.
Need a Digital mode
of each of the modes rather than trying to
force one or the other to do its best and to also
try to do what it is not designed for.
WDYT?
73, doc kd4e
I was initially supportive of the regulation by bandwidth because I
erroneously thought that it meant that you could have any wide bandwidth
Excellent comparison list! Thanks!
How would you compare modes capable of transferring
text files vs keyboard to keyboard, please?
Thanks! 73, doc kd4e
RTTY has no error correction capability and is 45.5 baud.
AMTOR is basically RTTY with an ARQ mode.
PSK-31 is 31 baud and more robust
same thing.
WDYT?
73, doc kd4e
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
Yahoo! Groups Links
but less challenging than asking the
FCC to flex the regs, even for the sake of Homeland
Security-relevant communications testing!
doc
I have long wanted to be able to do this, here in the U.S., just like is
done now with SSTV on several HF bands.
But what you propose is currently illegal on all
was in use but KD4E did not
hear that station.
If so W0JAB so informs KD4E and they QSY prior to
continuing any QSO.
This has been the Ham tradition so long as I know.
At least since the 60's and I'd guess long before
that!
73, doc kd4e
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet
mode user can be cited for willful QRM (and they have
been) then the precedent has been established and no
mode deserves an exemption.
I am not sure why the FCC (or the ARRL) would see
this in any other way. It is, much as I hate the
expression, a no-brainer.
IMHO ... ;-) doc
The SCAMP
is king.
These are simple and indisputable facts that no
emergency management professional may ignore unless
he wants to end up like the former FEMA Director.
IMHO, YMMV ... 73, doc kd4e
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector
if they are going to find widespread use and if they
are to meet EMCOMM requirements to be highly redundant.
What sense does it make to be MS-centric only to discover
that just when you need your app MS has crashed again or
been hacked for the 10,000th time?
IMHO, YMMV ... 73, doc kd4e
I would caution
. The hardware is so rare as
to be readily postulated as probably unavailable at
both ends and the complexity of the systems rise above
standard emergency requirements for mission-critical
applications.
A third-tier or fourth-tier nice-to-have perhaps.
IMHO, YMMV ... 73, doc kd4e
Last August San Diego
that no one is above the law, regs, nor common
courtesy.
;-) doc
Hmmm. I have sent them a note or two in the past over exactly that. I or
someone else was using a freq and they fired up. I let them no in
unequivocal terms, that is not suppose to happen. They are no different
than anyone else
for any reason is always
an infraction.
Too late and too much of a cold for more ... and
no real need. ;-)
doc
On the other hand, I do not feel at all obliged to vacate a frequency where
a scheduled transmission or net is going to meet, in say half an hour.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect
not balanced with the receive side).
IMHO, YMMV ... 73, doc kd4e
Lets try the guy 150 miles from you well within your
ring of silence (you can't copy each other if you had to)
listens to the frenquncy (unable to ask if the frequency
is in use on every mode known to man) hears nothing.
brings
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
