--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Suggestion: Don't wait for an OO. Look up his call at QRZ.com, get
his phone number, give him a call and talk to him about the
problem. The op probably does not know that he is over-driving his
audio.
I've
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The WinLink folks could easily use the SCAMP busy detector to augment
their PMBOs, eliminating their current propensity to transmit on
already-busy frequencies. This would require
1. adding a soundcard to each
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brad wrote:
KL7's, KP4's and KH6's can operate SSB from 7075 to 7100. .
Brad VK2QQ
That's news to me. Is that right?
10 seconds with Google will direct you to Part 97.307.f(11)
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, ZPO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of the brands I've used:
Panasonic Toughbook (I'm typing this on a CF-18)
Itronix (old 6250, ix250, ix260)
Getac (some old - some new)
Even though most of them aren't natively 12VDC, they often have 12V auto
adpaters
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Becker wrote:
At 02:03 PM 1/21/2007, you wrote in part:
There was no good reason to distort the tests by
inserting the specialized hardware, I believe that
Pactor I will run on a sound card, only Pactor II
and
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't think you should run these on the 480 as they are in the AF
chain and will always degrade the information you need to decode the
signal.
It's not what you hear, it's what your software can decode. Let the
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
I regularly use the rig's filters to enhance the signal quality at
my end. one thing I haven't got my head around yet are the noise
blankers and noise reduction devices, which seem to have an adverse
effect on the quality of
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Brown wrote:
I don't think you should run these on the 480 as they are in the AF
chain and will always degrade the information you need to decode the
signal.
It's not what you hear, it's what
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mulveyraa2 wrote:
Are you using the mechanical filters, the DSP filters, or both?
Particularly for digital modes, the mechanical filters will make a
world of difference, since they'll be reducing
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with running power in PSK mode, would mostly go away, if
one is careful about how much audio drive he is applying to the
signal. To ensure there are no side lobes on the waterfalls of other
ops, you much
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Mayfield - AA5J
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are probably right, Danny. However, I neither know nor care what
DXCC Entity I am in and I got the following back from the request:
Processing file 'AA5J.tq5'
2007-01-03 03:15:49 Started processing
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Mayfield - AA5J
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mulveyraa2 wrote: -- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com, Chuck Mayfield - AA5J
You're not reading the error message it gave you. It says that
Call sign, DXCC Entity
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Nacho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I´m thinking about to build Elecraft K2 kit with SSB option for
working in digital modes, but I have received some comments about this
rig is not enought apropiate for digital modes because it hasn´t
enought
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I am not a programmer, other than taking some rudimentary
courses,
reading some of Don Lancaster's books, and knowing that it is not
something I could ever do very well, something still doesn't seem
right
to me when
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Johnne Ables [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I mentioned in a previous post (For which I was adequately
chastised off-group) I am interested in utilizing the new digital
modes. I am interested in a new TenTec rig. Is the 20 watt Argonaut
516 adequate or
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
At 01:41 AM 6/22/2006, expeditionradio wrote:
I can sit here and decode and participate in an Olivia 500/16
QSO on 20meters that I cannot hear by ear and I cannot see any signal
on the waterfall.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your software has access to the entire transceiver pass band -- it
can hear what you would QRM if you transmitted. If there is no
signal within the transceiver pass band, then the range of
frequencies on which you
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The simple rebuttal to this post is its already been done. SCAMP
demonstrated a highly-effective busy frequency detector running on a
PC and soundcard more than a year ago.
OK, now you're verging into the
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
At 08:57 AM 6/22/2006, mulveyraa2 wrote:
The software would need to be able to determine whether any of
*dozens* of possible signals are present in the passband. In the case
of some of the more
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dean Gibson AE7Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Volume of traffic is the issue.
Why is that an issue? The last time I checked, the FCC doesn't
limit us to the number of QSO's we have, or the time we can spend on
the air.
Now, As a general comment...
20 matches
Mail list logo
