There was some last night on 1807-1810
On Jan 6, 2008 6:26 PM, Gary - N3JPU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Been trolling the low end of 160M for a while, is there any PSK users on
> 160M?
>
> Gary Mitchelson
> N3JPU Montgomery Co. MD FM19
> http://www.mitchelson.org/
>
>
--
An
Been trolling the low end of 160M for a while, is there any PSK users on
160M?
Gary Mitchelson
N3JPU Montgomery Co. MD FM19
http://www.mitchelson.org/
hello all
will be qrv tonight around 1810kc for any digi mode qso's.
starting somewhat near sunset here in NC. grid FM15mm.
barefoot with hygain 18ht over near perfect silicon dioxide.
david/wd4kpd
;KV9U" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place
> Danny,
>
> If we don't stay with the bandplans, then we can be sited by the FCC for
> not following "good amateur practice." The ARRL
Key word being *unattended* ..
I can not speak for the stations on 160 but I do see the reports
on the web site.
First understanding how this animal works will really help you.
I wont go into it here.
At 06:27 PM 2/14/2007, you wrote:
>John,
>
>Is it your understanding that they are running unat
John,
Is it your understanding that they are running unattended beacons on 160
meters?
Under Part 97 rules here in the U.S., it does not seem that you would be
allowed to transmit an unattended beacon on that band. And if you did
transmit a beacon, the bandplan calls for 1.999 at the very top
Rick
I don't care either. I don't use PSK myself. the only reason I bring
it up it that the PropNet station broadcast a beacon so many times
an hour. I just don't want to see a load of whining and crying when
someone gets QRM by one oh the propnet station like they did
over the pactor station.
John,
Most of us simply can not possibly know or even care about any
particular use of any particular frequency as long as we are properly
operating within our subband and mode. The one exception might be the
area of automatic operation around the 14.100 beacons and maybe others
in the world w
Danny,
If we don't stay with the bandplans, then we can be sited by the FCC for
not following "good amateur practice." The ARRL Bandplan is the defacto
bandplan for the U.S. That is why I don't venture out of the digital
part of 160 meters when using digital text modes. Ideally, CW stations
sh
where and when is this meeting place on 160m...would like to join in.
david/wd4kpd
.com/group/DXandTalk
- Original Message -
From: "KV9U" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place
> I wonder if group members might want to use 1808 KHz as "the" frequency
> fo
would like to do some more on 160mseems you guys are down there,
but need to when and where.
david/wd4kpd
At 08:28 AM 2/14/2007, you wrote:
>guessing the freq is around 1807, but when ?
>
>david/wd4kpd
Keep in mind that the PropNet folks are using 1807.5...
I wonder if group members might want to use 1808 KHz as "the" frequency
for 160 meter digital modes. And that means the actual frequency. With
the ease of seeing the bandwidth on waterfall displays, I favor
centering on the frequency. This means that you need to put your dial
frequency at the a
guessing the freq is around 1807, but when ?
david/wd4kpd
was K3GAU, who, like
you, was closer to the storms in the south.
would like to try this with dominoEX or PAX2
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: KV9U
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 1
I watched the print tonight on 160 and it was not all that good even
though signals were 20 over 9 at times from some of the stations. One of
the stations mentioned that the copy was rough at times. What do you
think would have worked better?
Right now QRN has been building this evening with S5
at 0315 Z K9NP, VE5MU, and K3GAU on 500/16 olivia
ve5mu , John
He who tries to inflict political statements on amateur radio is a DAMN FOOL.
73,
Chuck, AA5J
At 02:26 PM 2/26/2006, you wrote:
>Its because the ARRL has gone nuts, like Bush.
>
>73 de WB4M
>Buddy
>
Regards,
ChuckM mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com/~clmayfield
http://
in the top half of it, and that doesnt mean from 1.840 up. That isnt
half.
- Original Message -
From: "David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 2:15 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] 160M DIGI OPS.do as we say, not what we do
&
Its because the ARRL has gone nuts, like Bush.
73 de WB4M
Buddy
- Original Message -
From: "David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 2:15 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] 160M DIGI OPS.do as we say, not what we do
> GE
GEE...I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLY ONE THAT NOTICED THIS LAST NIGHT !!!
A QUOTE FROM ANOTHER REFLECTOR.
"W1AW has decided to break the ARRL's own bandplan and
operate on 1807.5.
I have a big problem with this. DXers do not own 160. They
can bend a little bit. The ARRL also sets a terrible
exampl
22 matches
Mail list logo