Title: RE: [digitalradio] Another look at ALE
Andy,
Are you talking about Automatic Link Establsihment capability to connect to stations or the service messaging protocol of ALE just to send text with?
Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
From what I have read here and elsewhere on ALE,
the potential is there, but the software is not.
Look forward to new software
development
...ALE
protocols are only 125 baud (375 bps) and not very wide and not a constant
flow (such as MT63, FS-1052, PACTOR etc.) so I do feel t
Hi Rick,
Aside from the limitations imposed on U.S. hams by FCC Part 97 which
preclude the use of full ALE Sounding and LQA based calling (which
over time may change) ALE can be applied in many ways for Amateur
Radio communications and excels as such in a number of ways when you
have a proper
I think that many of us have played around a bit with ALE but not found
it very compelling as a mode. It may be useful for applications where
you have users who do not understand HF propagation and who just want to
make a connection automatically. This is perhaps more common for
military or gov
John Bradley wrote:
> I've tried tackling ALE a couple of times, and have given up in
> frustration.
>
> The lack of setup for Kenwood Radios other than the 850 has got me
> baffled, since I have not been able to have the software "see"
> my Kenwood 480.. no scan, nadda. Have tried a bunc
From:
Andrew
O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 7:46
PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Another look at
ALE
With the interest in some of PAX2's capabilities, I wonder
if folks here have forgotten about ALE? It seems to me that it
offer
With the interest in some of PAX2's capabilities, I wonder if folks
here have forgotten about ALE? It seems to me that it offers link
abilities, message exchanges , signal information, and much more. I
still think ALE is a missed "digital" mode. It is more
than "digital", but people here mig
