David,
Is it possible that what you believe to be something coming from ARRL is
actually something coming from MARS? A good article outlining the
integration of MARS was in the eham article by Bill, N1IN about a year
and a half ago:
http://www.eham.net/articles/16856
Where it was stated
While we in this area was up to our back side with water
early this year Pactor and WinLink work just fine for us.
FEMA as well as SEMA Just loved that they could get updates via
their blackberry. You must first understand that in the rural areas
such as this there is very little cell coverage
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of John Becker, WŘJAB
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 5:22 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Global traffic and emergencies
While we in this area was up to our back side with water
early this year Pactor and WinLink work just fine
-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dave AA6YQ
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 5:30 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Global traffic and emergencies
Re I know that just made a lot of the anti pactor and anti wide sahck
... We do it for the love of the hobby
and public service
73 Dave WB2FTX
- Original Message -
From: David Little
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 5:47 PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Global traffic and emergencies
Another example of why
; George Thomas; Frank Van Cleef; Frank Fallon;
expeditionradio; Ewald, Steve, WV1X; Earl Moore; Earl Leach (WX4J);
David B. Popkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Knight; Dan Ostroy; Dale Sewell;
Benson Scott; Arnold; AG2R
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Global traffic and emergencies
David,
You have your
David,
I have been a ham for many years and follow most all public
service/emergency communications issues quite closely. I have never
heard of your claims below from any reputable source. If you read QST
and follow ARRL BOD decisions you would know that the ARRL has supported
any and all
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Global traffic and emergencies
David,
I have been a ham for many years and follow most all public
service/emergency communications issues quite closely. I have never
heard of your claims below from any reputable source. If you read QST
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of John Becker, WŘJAB
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 5:22 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Global traffic and emergencies
While we in this area was up to our back side
Hi Dave,
It is good to see someone at the Area Net level here on this group. The
last I heard, my Section and Region nets have no digital presence. I
have discussed incorporating digital modes some years ago with the STM,
but there seems to be almost all focus on phone and CW.
As a ham who
10 matches
Mail list logo
