K5YFW
>
> -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>]On Behalf Of KV9U Sent:
> Wednesday, January 10, 2007 3:12 PM To: d
yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Pactor versus Olivia
Rich and group,
I have read from the SCS website that there is still throughput with P2
and especially P3 when down to maybe as low as -16 db below noise.
Others have claimed that Pactor 2 and 3 drastically drop off by the time
Rich and group,
I have read from the SCS website that there is still throughput with P2
and especially P3 when down to maybe as low as -16 db below noise.
Others have claimed that Pactor 2 and 3 drastically drop off by the time
you reach -5 db S/N such as KN6KB's RFfootprints powerpoint on comp
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
>
> I actually had my first Pactor QSO today, there was a ham calling CQ
> on 40M Pactor 1 FEC. After working him via Pactor, we tried to
> compare Olivia versus Pactor going down to 1 watt, both were 100%
> copy. We were about 100 miles apart.
>
What BW/tones were you u
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
>
> I actually had my first Pactor QSO today, there was a ham calling CQ
> on 40M Pactor 1 FEC. After working him via Pactor, we tried to
> compare Olivia versus Pactor going down to 1 watt, both were 100%
> copy. We were about 100 miles apart.
>
> -- Andy K3UK Skype Me :
I actually had my first Pactor QSO today, there was a ham calling CQ
on 40M Pactor 1 FEC. After working him via Pactor, we tried to
compare Olivia versus Pactor going down to 1 watt, both were 100%
copy. We were about 100 miles apart.
--
Andy K3UK
Skype Me : callto://andyobrien73
www.obrienswe