Re: [digitalradio] Question about HF-email

2005-06-15 Thread Bill Vodall WA7NWP
> What I have never understood is why we can not develop a system whereby HF > (or for that matter VHF/UHF) stations can gateway into the internet via some > basic system that does not itself require a complicated and fragile internet > system. It is probably not possible since the routing issues

Re: [digitalradio] Question about HF-email - It works!

2005-06-15 Thread Dr. Howard S. White
-- From: John Becker To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 12:29 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Question about HF-email Paul you have it right up to here.At this time there is no software that will doPactor or Amtor ARQ mode due to

RE: [digitalradio] Question about HF-email

2005-06-15 Thread Rick Williams
] Question about HF-email I was kinda interested in HF-email until I found out I must buy a "pactor" modem, either used or from SCS. As that one company is the only source of hardware, it seems more a monopoly than free market. Also - it's one more box to connect/power/configure/worry abo

Re: [digitalradio] Question about HF-email

2005-06-15 Thread John Becker
Paul you have it right up to here. At this time there is no software that will do Pactor or Amtor ARQ mode due to the tight timing required between to stations. I did do some playing with a linux program but it would only do 35 to 40 per cent of what the TNC would do. If you are going to play Amt

[digitalradio] Question about HF-email

2005-06-15 Thread Paul
I was kinda interested in HF-email until I found out I must buy a "pactor" modem, either used or from SCS. As that one company is the only source of hardware, it seems more a monopoly than free market. Also - it's one more box to connect/power/configure/worry about. The rig and computer (maybe ant