Re: [digitalradio] Re: ARQ Soundcard Modes

2006-09-17 Thread Patrick Lindecker
: Sunday, September 17, 2006 7:11 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ARQ Soundcard Modes Note: there are not the only modes without documentation... 73 Patrick Are the other undocumented modes also commercial products? If a request is made to view the documentation

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ARQ Soundcard Modes

2006-09-16 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello, Is it just that the Pactor mode allows only a very short time for the ACK/NAK, or is there some synchronization from packet to packet that must be maintained? The second proposal is the good one. Is it possible that one could write a sound card program that could monitor Pactor II/III

[digitalradio] Re: ARQ Soundcard Modes

2006-09-16 Thread Dave Bernstein
A question for you, Patrick: in your opinion, is the public documentation for Pactor 2 and Pactor 3 sufficient to allow you to build your own implementations? 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Is it just

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ARQ Soundcard Modes

2006-09-16 Thread Patrick Lindecker
, September 16, 2006 10:29 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ARQ Soundcard Modes A question for you, Patrick: in your opinion, is the public documentation for Pactor 2 and Pactor 3 sufficient to allow you to build your own implementations? 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio

[digitalradio] Re: ARQ Soundcard Modes

2006-09-15 Thread jhaynesatalumni
I'm still trying to understand this matter of precision timing. Is it just that the Pactor mode allows only a very short time for the ACK/NAK, or is there some synchronization from packet to packet that must be maintained? Is it possible that one could write a sound card program that could