Goes
Unpunished"Formerly "Awfully Extremely Six Sado Masochist""Krazy Yankee
Six Loves America"Website: www.ky6la.com
- Original Message -
From:
Dave
Bernstein
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 10:12
PM
Subj
- Original Message -
From: Dave Bernstein
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 10:12 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to the Winlink team
Please explain why SCAMP would not totally displace Pactor as a
transport
Automatic stations that occupy unpredictable frequencies are not in
the spirit of Ham Radio when these stations blindly begin
transmitting with absolutely no regard to the existing occupants of
the frequencies. This is a hobby. It is not a mandate from on-high
to provide emergency
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 10:12 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to the Winlink team
Please explain why SCAMP would not totally displace Pactor
as a
transport protocol for Winlink.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
- Original Message -
From: "n3hkn" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 7:08 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to the Winlink
team
Automatic stations that
occupy unpredictable frequencies are not in the spirit of Ham R
ca"Website: www.ky6la.com
- Original Message -
From:
Dave
Bernstein
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 1:27
AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to the
Winlink team
For non-realtime message delivery, you would choose a
protoc
ay, April 12, 2005 11:32
AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to the
Winlink team
No, Howard, I'm wondering why a service that requires
only the equivalent of 6 SSB channels to move its traffic is optimizing
above all for throughput rather than taking into account the QRM it ca
Formerly Awfully Extremely Six Sado Masochist
Krazy Yankee Six Loves America
Website: www.ky6la.com
- Original Message -
From: Dave Bernstein
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:32 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to the Winlink team
Formerly Awfully Extremely Six Sado Masochist
Krazy Yankee Six Loves America
Website: www.ky6la.com
- Original Message -
From: Dave Bernstein
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:32 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to the Winlink team
Is the name of their SCS robot
pactor detector Maximillian or Arnold? Both were quit effective but did have
design flaws.
Cliff N7HIY
Dave
scribed
"Several times now, you have
mentioned the busy detector in the SCS modem, and each time, I've reminded
you that it only detects Pactor
Dave,
Thanks for the note. Just getting back here. You are mostly correct,
and there has been efforts to attempt to request improvement for the
SCS signal detection. Assuming band planning will follow the FCC's
recommendations, my personal thinking is that it will need to be
deployed for
on the WL2K system.
Rick, KV9U
-Original Message-
From: Steve Waterman, k4cjx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 8:58 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to the Winlink team
Rick,
Yes, the WL2KEmComm group is focused
: Monday, April 11, 2005 8:58 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to the Winlink team
Rick,
Yes, the WL2KEmComm group is focused on implementation issues, and is
not set up for should we discussions regarding deployments. As
modorator of the group, I have
server
on the WL2K system.
Rick, KV9U
-Original Message-
From: Steve Waterman, k4cjx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 8:58 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to the Winlink team
Rick,
Yes, the WL2KEmComm
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
AA6YQ comments below:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steve Waterman, k4cjx
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I would be surprised if the SCS modem has the horsepower to
implement multi-mode busy
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have a million questions and the source code is required but I
can do
the busy detection
algorithms in short order. I have been too swamped to do anything
about modem work but
if I can help make this better
Dave,
The problem is not that we mind any opposition to what we are doing.
It gives us an opportunity to tell our story. The problem is not the
protocol we use, be it Amtor, Clover, Pactor, SCAMP or what comes
next, and next after that, nor is it the fact that we stopped using
fully,
Howard, I have been paying attention to the
different messages on Winlink, some I agree with some I don't, but I did see you
mention SCAMP, is this downloadable software?
73
Kurt
WA8VBX
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
Yahoo! Groups Links
I had opted not to participate in this thread so far,
but it seems once again that the hidden station case
is not seen, and it is very common on HF, even DXers
know about it to their frustration
Anyone that does not hear any other station may
trigger a Winlink PMBO response. This may
.) that have not even been addressed yet.
Rick, KV9U
-Original Message-
From: Steve Waterman, k4cjx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 10:10 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to the Winlink team
Dave,
The problem
2005 9:28
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Advice
to the Winlink team
Steve I will pick a bone with you on this
statement. Because you are usinga proprietary modem that costs
over $1000.00 you are slowing the spread ofemergency communications in
ARES. Contrary to
. And there are other issues
(security,
etc.) that have not even been addressed yet.
Rick, KV9U
-Original Message-
From: Steve Waterman, k4cjx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 10:10 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Advice
Dave,
You did make two statements that I find in conflict:
Requiring busy detectors for attended operation makes no sense,
Steve. As Rick KV9U pointed out, any SSB, RTTY, CW, or PSK operator
who knowingly calls over existing QSOs would simply disable the
busy detector.
I did not suggest
om
- Original Message -
From:
Mike/k1eg
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 7:17
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to
the Winlink team
Dr. White I am glad to see that were getting away
from a proprietary modem and going
24 matches
Mail list logo
