[digitalradio] Re: CQ DRCC...

2007-10-26 Thread jhaynesatalumni
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that I have mentioned some of this before, but unless you have a club of some kind where interested hams join and buy in to a concept, a numbering system may not be something that many will gravitate toward. I'll

Re: [digitalradio] Re: CQ DRCC...

2007-10-25 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I don't think your messsage had to be approved, it may have been simply that Yahoo some times delays the email Andy. On 10/25/07, va3jno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com, n6vl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why can't the digitalradio

[digitalradio] Re: CQ DRCC...

2007-10-25 Thread Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think your messsage had to be approved, it may have been simply that Yahoo some times delays the email Andy. I was wrong... Oct 25, 2007 7:58 pmva3jno Post status changed by molou99 w0jab

Re: [digitalradio] Re: CQ DRCC...

2007-10-25 Thread Rick
I think that I have mentioned some of this before, but unless you have a club of some kind where interested hams join and buy in to a concept, a numbering system may not be something that many will gravitate toward. In terms of digital operation, we digital operators are an extreme minority of