I don't think your messsage had to be "approved", it may have been simply that Yahoo some times delays the email Andy.
On 10/25/07, va3jno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com <digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>, > "n6vl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Why can't the digitalradio reflector have a similar degree of > > activity discussing modes, bands, and where to collect numbers. I > > think this is what Andy hoped for. After he, issued the numbers, I > > haven't sent a single message about how to go about collecting > > numbers. Does this mean digital ops don't have the same enthusiasm as > > CW ops? I don't think so. > > > > Well, I posted a message titled CQ DRCC this morning saying I was on > frequency .... until .... and looking for DRCC and FH numbers. > Unfortunately, by the time the message was approved, the time had > expired and I had gone to do work around the house. I guess I posted > the message about the time that Andy was headed to work so he didn't > see it in time to be of use. > I have also in the past self-spotted on the W6RK data mode spots page > and not had anyone come back to my CQs. > Is there little interest in actually having QSOs in digital modes > other than PSK, or am I simply not posting/spotting in the right > places? Where would such activity be best? > > 73, Jim VA3HJ > > > -- Andy K3UK www.obriensweb.com (QSL via N2RJ)
