kd4e wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There does seem to be a near consensus of radio amateurs that Pactor 3
simply does not belong on the amateur bands.
If that is true then BPL has won.
What, please, do BPL and P3 have in common?
Both are of value to their users and thus the community
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon
Maguire
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 4:23 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: FCC Failure
Pactor III will violate Part 97 when the new rules go into affect and in fact
may violate Part 97 now due to other problems associated
Somehow, the Federal Register posting neglected to resolve the
conflict concerning automatic digital forwarding on 80 meters. There
is no change to section 97.221. Forwarding is allowed, but it isn't,
yet it is? Raising the lower end for voice to 3.635 would fix a few
problems.
I have to agree it dosn't seen like they even
lissened.
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somehow, the Federal Register posting neglected to
resolve the
conflict concerning automatic digital forwarding
on 80 meters. There
is no change to section 97.221. Forwarding is
Remember, that the FCC was responding to a number of competing
petitions. While the ARRL has a strong influence, it only has one
petition. Any individual can make proposals as well, and they did. Note
how the FCC used those arguments to support their changes to the rules.
In terms of automatic
There does seem to be a near consensus of radio amateurs that Pactor 3
simply does not belong on the amateur bands.
If that is true then BPL has won.
P3 is a good first step towards modern communications technologies.
A mouse going SQUEAK SQUEAK SQUEAK. He's making lots and lots of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There does seem to be a near consensus of radio amateurs that Pactor 3
simply does not belong on the amateur bands.
If that is true then BPL has won.
What, please, do BPL and P3 have in common?
(Other than frequent and well-founded complaints
about QRMing other
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:06 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: FCC Failure
There does seem to be a near consensus of radio amateurs that Pactor
Pactor III will violate Part 97 when the new rules go into affect and
in fact
*may violate Part 97 now due to other problems associated with the mode.
*Walt, please elaborate on the second part of this statement. Thank you.
73... Jon W1MNK
