Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Digital Voice

2007-05-13 Thread John Becker
Guys let's not start yet another rant on bandwidth. All Bonnie was pointing out was that there is no limit on DV at this time. I really don't think anyone would run anything wider that a SSB signal anyway. John, W0JAB Your (trying to be) friendly moderator

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Digital Voice

2007-05-13 Thread Danny Douglas
ard card. moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED] moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 5:40 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Digital Voice > Most hams want to do the right thing when it com

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Digital Voice

2007-05-13 Thread mrfarm
Most hams want to do the right thing when it comes to operating on our very limited frequencies. That means keeping our signals as narrow as we possibly can to reduce interference to others. The FCC rules state that we should operate with good amateur practices and have also said that voice ban

[digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Digital Voice

2007-05-13 Thread expeditionradio
> Rick KV9U wrote: > This is one of the reasons that I do not expect DV to ever become > all that popular on HF. > ... since I doubt that there is any chance to have wider > bandwidth modes such as you have on VHF and up with over 6 kHz wide > signals. Hi Rick, In USA, there is currently

Re: [digitalradio] Re: [WinDRM] Re: Digital voice now

2007-03-23 Thread kv9u
I was able to listen for a little bit when several stations were running WinDRM tests in the past week, especially Jason, N1SU, and another station who I heard fairly well on DV, but K0PFX was only copyable when on analog SSB since he was too weak to decode. The sample you have sounds pretty to

[digitalradio] Re: windrm

2007-01-05 Thread Webo_Flies
Try ftp://f6gia.no-ip.org/melp_dll.zip That URL was added to the WinDRM (http://n1su.com/windrm/) download page recently. It worked for me on 1/5/07

[digitalradio] Re: windrm

2007-01-02 Thread Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "r_lwesterfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, I did this as well but I cannot get the rig to key. I am using Comm 3 > which is what MixW uses with ease and I have tried every conceivable PTT > checkbox combination under "SETUP". What am I missing???

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WINDRM setup

2006-12-12 Thread Dave Corio
Would have to rewire, as all jacks on the Audigy card are in use. Would have to unplug something to plug in an external mic, which I don't have, any way hi! The USB headset is what I used when talking to you on Skype. It has good tone and level for this. I believe I had the mixer setting

[digitalradio] Re: WINDRM setup

2006-12-11 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Why do you need to 'rewire' the back of the PC to use just one soundcard ? DO you have the "mixer settings" within Windrm set for the correct source? Andy K3UK --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Corio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, just finished testing and adjusting, and ad

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WINDRM setup

2006-12-11 Thread Dave Corio
Well, just finished testing and adjusting, and admit to being more confused than before. If I select just one of the soundcards, I can trigger the VOX on the 746. No matter how I set up two cards, though, it simply refuses to work. I went through the quick-start guide repeatedly, figuring I

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WINDRM setup

2006-12-11 Thread Jose A. Amador
It has not been easy for me using the same interface for other sound card modes. With two cards, I used my best card (an Audigy 2) to receive, and the AC-97 to transmit. It is a bit tricky to separate everything the way it shall be set up, but seemingly my setup worked. Only I could not separa

[digitalradio] Re: WINDRM setup

2006-12-11 Thread Dave
I'll give that a try when I get home tonight. It was working with only one sound card when you & I tried to hook up, but haven't been able to get "fire" using two. I'll also check out the "quick start up" that Mel mentioned in another post. Thanks es 73 Dave KB3MOW --- In digitalradio@yahoogroup

[digitalradio] Re: WINDRM setup: new file

2006-12-11 Thread Andrew O'Brien
FYI. A new "Quick Setup" document is now available. This is a simplified, step by step 3 page document to help the new user get on the air with WinDRM as quick as possible. Emphasis was given on the set up of both single and dual sound cards to help avoid confusion that some users may have

[digitalradio] Re: WinDRM with MicroHam Microkeyer?

2006-12-11 Thread Andrew O'Brien
-Yes, it works fine . I actually use the same preset in the device router that I use for Logger32. I have port 5 for rig control and port 7 for PTT. Since Windrm does not provide rig control beyond PTT, the use of port 5 is not needed. I just have WinDRM set for port 7 as PTT. Andy K3UK.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: [WinDRM] DV activity now -- 14236.0

2006-11-02 Thread Paul Metzger
I'm monitoring 14.236 for the past 15 minutes, hearing DV fade in and out here in Los Angeles. Try the new DV chat room, I was up until 4AM getting it to go. http://www.hamradio-dv.org/aor/digital-ssb/chat-room/chat-room.htm Let me know what you think. Paul Metzger KQ6EH -

[digitalradio] Re: [WinDRM] DV activity now -- 14236.0

2006-11-02 Thread Tony
All: Still on WinDRM / DRMDV 14236 as of 1830z Tony KT2Q - Original Message - From: "Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 1:16 PM Subject: [WinDRM] DV activity now -- 14236.0 > > All: > > Mel (K0PFX) Cesco (HB9TLK) and G0OGX on 142

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Hiss??? PROBLEM SOLVED!!!!!!

2006-10-11 Thread KV9U
Al Chandler, K6RFK used to be prominently displayed in some of AEA's advertisements at the peak of their success. He was one of the engineers who I believe was instrumental in the development of the PK-232 and perhaps some of the other interfaces in the CP series. I have had the CP-1 for many y

RE: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Hiss??? PROBLEM SOLVED!!!!!!

2006-10-11 Thread DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
CTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 10:12 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Hiss??? PROBLEM SOLVED!! I can't help you either. A bit hard to mount a computer vs AOR DV modem in a mobile set up like I have done. John, W0JAB At 08:41 AM 10/11/2006, y

RE: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Hiss??? PROBLEM SOLVED!!!!!!

2006-10-11 Thread DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 8:41 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Hiss??? PROBLEM SOLVED!! Paul, Have you found a significant difference between the quality and robustness of the AOR product vs. WinDRM? It s

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Hiss??? PROBLEM SOLVED!!!!!!

2006-10-11 Thread John Becker
I can't help you either. A bit hard to mount a computer vs AOR DV modem in a mobile set up like I have done. John, W0JAB At 08:41 AM 10/11/2006, you wrote: Paul, Have you found a significant difference between the quality and robustness of the AOR product vs. WinDRM? __._,_.___ Need a D

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Hiss??? PROBLEM SOLVED!!!!!!

2006-10-11 Thread Paul Metzger
On Oct 11, 2006, at 06:41, KV9U wrote: > Paul, > > Have you found a significant difference between the quality and > robustness of the AOR product vs. WinDRM? Sorry Rick, I have never used WinDRM. Mainly due to the fact that I do not use Windows as an OS platform. Also, it draws less power than

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Hiss??? PROBLEM SOLVED!!!!!!

2006-10-11 Thread KV9U
Paul, Have you found a significant difference between the quality and robustness of the AOR product vs. WinDRM? It seems to me that external hardware would become obsolete if worked about as well as the free sound card product. This is not unlike the situation that has occured with hardware mo

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Hiss??? PROBLEM SOLVED!!!!!!

2006-10-10 Thread Tony
er 10, 2006 11:32 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Hiss??? PROBLEM SOLVED!! > I've been calling CQ for the past couple hours on 40m. But then again, > I'm using the AOR DV units, not WinDRM. > > Sorry. > > Paul Metzger > > -- > >

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Hiss??? PROBLEM SOLVED!!!!!!

2006-10-10 Thread Paul Metzger
I've been calling CQ for the past couple hours on 40m. But then again, I'm using the AOR DV units, not WinDRM. Sorry. Paul Metzger -- On Oct 10, 2006, at 20:21, Tony wrote: > All: > > Problem solved!! > > I did a loopback test with WinDRM, running two rigs and two computers.

[digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Hiss??? PROBLEM SOLVED!!!!!!

2006-10-10 Thread Tony
All: Problem solved!! I did a loopback test with WinDRM, running two rigs and two computers. It turns out that it was the 3.5mm MONO jack that connects the sound card audio output to the rig. I switched to a stereo jack and the noise vanished! It took a few hours to find, but the hiss is now

RE: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM

2006-10-08 Thread Dave Corio
bject: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM I'm on 7291 USB now 1623-- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Corio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> I've QSY'd up to 7.291 USB due to heavy SSB QRM on 86.> > > -Original Message-> From

[digitalradio] Re: WinDRM

2006-10-08 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I'm on 7291 USB now 1623 -- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Corio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've QSY'd up to 7.291 USB due to heavy SSB QRM on 86. > > > -Original Message- > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Nick > Sent: Sunday

[digitalradio] Re: WinDRM freqs

2006-09-28 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I guess 7296 was the wrong place to listen, no wonder I heard no one! On 9/28/06, Andrew O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 6. What frequencies do others use WinDRM? > > > This varies from country to country but essentially these are the most > popular frequencies, USB, VFO dial frequency: > >

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM voice tonight anyone?

2006-09-28 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I just got home for the evening. so can test for the next 3-4 hours if anyone is interested. I am on 7296 but may occasionally check 14236. 40M sound fair tonight. Andy K3UK On 9/28/06, Ed Hekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andy, > > I didn't hear any signals last night either. After I wr

[digitalradio] Re: WinDRM voice tonight anyone?

2006-09-28 Thread Ed Hekman
Andy, I didn't hear any signals last night either. After I wrote that post I realized that EchoLink uses one of the sound cards required for WinDRM. It will take a few minutes to set up another USB sound card for EchoLink tonight. How is the evening propagation on 40M? If we don't connect t

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM voice tonight anyone?

2006-09-28 Thread KV9U
I also did not hear any digital signals up at 7.296 USB. I did transmit some test signals as it appears you can send a text message and also if you are able to copy and lock on a transmitting station, you can see their call sign and other parameters. 73, Rick, KV9U Andrew O'Brien wrote: >E

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM voice tonight anyone?

2006-09-28 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Ed. I will give you a shout on Echolink. I may also try it with my neighbour who is also a ham (we should have a good signal to noise ratio!) . I heard no signals last night , did you? Andy K3UK On 9/28/06, Ed Hekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.co

[digitalradio] Re: WinDRM voice tonight anyone?

2006-09-28 Thread Ed Hekman
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am interested in trying my first digital voice QSO, using WINDRM, anyone > want to also try it tonight ? I just discovered WinDRM tonight and would like to try it but I don't get home until after 7PM PDST. I

[digitalradio] Re: WinDRM voice tonight anyone?

2006-09-27 Thread Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Try 7296 USB. > > > At 06:05 PM 9/27/2006, you wrote: > >I am interested in trying my first digital voice QSO, using WINDRM, anyone > >want to also try it tonight ? > I'm there now. Need a Digital mode QSO? C