Toby Burnett wrote:
> Wow, I hadn't been looking at these messages for a few days as they were
> flooding my e-mail software faster than I could be bothered to read.
>>From what I read here Andy,
> that is really shocking, to actively place code into a software to disable
> it from being used by
Hi Phil,
I have followed this from the beginning and to be honest it sickens me.
People raise a legitimate question because of the author's own wording
and Jose became hostile over it. Now he is going to ban people from his
program and all future programs that he writes. Why are we putting u
To: digitalradio; rosdigitalmodemgr...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Statement on Withdrawal of Support for ROS (K3UK
Sked Pages)
I was disturbed when the ROS author suggested that he was considering
Legal action against N3TL for merely raising the question of legality
In the U
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 07:56 -0500, Andy obrien wrote:
> "Some people think to keep telling lies on Internet blogs is going to
> go free. People still trying to outlaw ROS although the FCC has given
> approval will not be able to make any QSO with ROS or any of the
> projects I have designed for th
I was disturbed when the ROS author suggested that he was considering
legal action against N3TL for merely raising the question of legality
in the USA. I am even more disturbed that the author of the software
has an apparent plan to include the callsign of certain hams in a
"non-grata" list , sugg
