Quoting Paul L Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
"Why do gentlemen's agreements work on 160 meters but nowhere else?
Does anyone remember back a few years when we all had to look at
the cheat-sheet to see which segments of 160 we could use for
ANYTHING, then see how much power we could have in that se
They both "use" SSB transmissions, and it's quite true that SSTV is not
data -- SSTV is "image", and the U.S. phone bands are designated
"voice/image" and "data". It is still illegal in the U.S. to be on a
voice frequency and say "OK, Bob, Here's the data you need: [multi-
tone beeps for 20 secon
ssage-
From: Danny Douglas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 10:09 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Winlink take over?
"Right now it is OK to transmit digital voice on voice channels and yet you
can not transmit digital data AND voic
"Right now it is OK to transmit digital voice on voice channels and yet you
can not transmit digital data AND voice on voice channels. Even emergency
data"
We may transmit any mode on any frequency under emergency conditions. We
may NOT transmit on those unassigned modes/freqs if it is NOT an em
Skip,
With all due respect, (and you have considerable), it seems that some of the
arguments may be counter productive and may in some cases affect the
survival of amateur radio.
We are not a hobby in the eyes of the FCC. The hobby part is only due to a
fortuitous intersection of our interests w
