-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I would like to nominate myself for a seat to the Membership Committee
elections. I have been member of this committee from its beginning and
it would be a pleasure for me to be given the opportunity to serve
another term.
I am with the
I'm willing to serve once again on the Membership Committee in the event
the Membership collectively believes that to be useful.
- I was a member of the previous Committee, and acted as the Election
Officer for the Document Foundation Board election.
- I have had a long involvement with
I would like to nominate my self for a seat in Membership Committee.
Name: Leif Lyngby Lodahl
E-mail: leiflod...@gmail.com
Affiliation: I work for Magenta - but my engagement in The Document
Foundation is a private matter - although Magenta is an open source company.
I was one of the founding
Florian,
On 13 August 2012 02:21, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.orgwrote:
I was not aware that any list existed that did not use reply mangling so
that the reply (by default) went back to the list Will be interested to
see what occurs.
On 08/12/2012 12:26 PM, Florian
On 13 August 2012 09:58, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 08:14 +0100, Tony Pursell wrote:
I will find this a real pain. I use Gmail, which seems to only have
Reply
and Reply to All. There is no Reply to List. So to send this back to
the
list I have
Hi All,
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote (13-08-12 15:21)
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have
changed (so-called Reply to mangling has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In other
words, with any e-mail client, replies to
Hi,
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2012-08-13 15:21:
- what was the final push to do this change*right now*?
- what were the thoughts to do the change*this way*?
- what was the criteria of balancing the effects between change and no
change (not the ones*this* behaviour or*that*
On 2012-08-12 12:26 PM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
I know we had numerous discussions on this topic in the past, but the
outcome was that roughly 50% were for this change, and 50% refused it,
so I am really sitting between two chairs here, for which I beg for your
2012/8/13 Tony Pursell a...@princeswalk.fsnet.co.uk:
Florian,
On 13 August 2012 02:21, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.orgwrote:
I was not aware that any list existed that did not use reply mangling so
that the reply (by default) went back to the list Will be interested to
see
